Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 May 2006 (Monday) 23:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

iso speed

 
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
May 22, 2006 23:57 |  #1

What ISO speed to you use most? 100 or 200. What do you usually have it set for landscapes .Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
englishw
Member
Avatar
103 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Salem, Oregon USA
     
May 23, 2006 00:30 |  #2

There are a lot of variables, ISO is only one. For landscapes: available light, depth of field, and a tripod present all play into effect. If I have a tripod and I am looking to attain a wide depth of field, I will stop down to f/22 or something and to get the least amount of noise possible, use ISO 100. Now, this is on my 30D. If you are shooting with an older model, specifically one that had high long exposure noise issues, you will have to balance long exposure noise and ISO noise. A higher ISO will produce noise, but so will long expusures. It may be necessary to sacrifice some depth of field and open up the apature a little to allow for a shorter exposure. If I have no tripod (on a hike or something) I may have to sacrifice noise or depth of field (or both if it is a dusk) to achieve a sharp image.

These are just examples. I don't have a "usual" setting for my ISO. As a general rule, you put it as low as possible, but it is a setting just like aperature and shutter speed that should be taken into consideration in each scenerio.


-BilL
www.OurAlbumOnline.com (external link)
All Canon
: EOS 30D w/ BG-E2 grip
| A2E | 50mm f/1.8 | 17-40mm f/4L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Speedlite 430ex | 2x II Extender EF | 500D Close-up Lens | RS-80N3 Remote Switch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kwsanders
Goldmember
Avatar
1,259 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Hayden, AL
     
May 23, 2006 00:34 |  #3

My rule of thumb... I use the smallest ISO with which I can still get a sharp photo when hand holding the camera. It depends on available light and shutter speed, of course.


Kerry Sanders | flickr (external link)
60D w/BG-E9 grip, 20D w/BG-E2 grip, 400mm f/5.6L, 70-200mm f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 1.4x II Extender, 580EX Flash
Manfrotto MK190XPRO3-BH with 496RC2 Ball Head
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tut
Member
45 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Texas, USA
     
May 23, 2006 00:58 |  #4

I use iso 100 unless the available light will not let me use either the aperature setting or shutter speed setting I prefer. I then start increasing the iso from 100 to 800 to give correct exposure of the picture. If I have to go beyond iso 800 for correct exposure, I stop there and start making compromises on the aperature and shutter speed settings.
But there are a lot of qualifiers - I'm not shooting sporting events or weddings, I'm not trying to be creative and produce a special effect, I'm not using a tripod, etc, etc - just walking around taking pictures of friends, parties, parades, buildings, landscapes and everyday things.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
May 23, 2006 01:03 |  #5

I change ISO all the time depending on lighting conditions.


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
May 23, 2006 01:06 |  #6

I always select the ISO after first determining what type of exposure is required to achieve the result I'm looking for. Generally I pick the aperture first (unless there is motion involved and then the shutter speed is first), followed by the ISO setting to achieve the shutter speed desired. If the ISO required is higher than 800, I usually rethink the aperture or shutter speed to keep the ISO below 800.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
May 23, 2006 02:50 |  #7

I tend to leave mine on 200 for most 'general' shooting, however, as everyone else has said, if the light falls and you need that small apperture or high shutter speed I change it.
For any landscape shots (particularly if on a tripod or using my IS lens) I like to change to 100 (If I remember!)
If i'm shooting horses eventing (which I do regularly) I always use 400 or sometimes higher depending upon the light. Having faster lenses helps as well, and as people here have said, it is really just another part of the exposure equation.


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Parr
should have taken his own advice
Avatar
6,593 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
     
May 23, 2006 02:53 as a reply to  @ kevin_c's post |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

If I'm shooting a concert, I'm normally at 800 or 1600.

I'm in Nova Scotia right now, shooting a lot of landscape stuff, and have been using an ISO of 100...


Steve

Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Sigma Lenses, Various "Stuff"...

OnStage Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HPZ
Member
73 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
May 23, 2006 03:19 |  #9

Does anyone here ever use ISO 3200?
If so - for what circumstances?
On the 20D this is a custom function setting - which needs to be turned on first, then dialed in. Is there a reason why it's a custom function setting, instead of just a dial in setting?


50D and 20D + BG-E2 grip
10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM + Hoya UV filter
24-105mm f/4.L IS USM
28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM + Jessops UV filter + EW-78BII hood
100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM + Hoya UV filter + ET-83C hood

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
May 23, 2006 04:22 |  #10

I use ISO 3200 frequently for night racing action. I'm actually pretty impressed with the shots. Sure there is some noise but not enough that the shot is total garbage.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
May 23, 2006 04:50 |  #11

Thanks for all replies .I use my Feisol tripod a lot shooting waterfalls so I always use 100
for that. 200 for general but with 17-85is I can stay at 100.I am trying to use tripod a lot more.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
May 23, 2006 05:55 as a reply to  @ HPZ's post |  #12

See my answers below :D

HPZ wrote:
Does anyone here ever use ISO 3200? YES
If so - for what circumstances? When needed (too little light :p)
On the 20D this is a custom function setting - which needs to be turned on first, then dialed in. Is there a reason why it's a custom function setting, instead of just a dial in setting? So that only people who know what they are doing use it...

You can always correct noise in the image up to a point ... try that with motion blur.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keiffer
Goldmember
Avatar
2,259 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Orlando Fl.
     
May 23, 2006 06:43 |  #13

I generally use ISO 200, and will switch sometimes at night to bring my shutter speed up. But all in all it's usually set to 200.



http://kcschoeppler.fo​topic.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
May 23, 2006 07:02 as a reply to  @ HPZ's post |  #14

HPZ wrote:
Does anyone here ever use ISO 3200?
If so - for what circumstances?
On the 20D this is a custom function setting - which needs to be turned on first, then dialed in. Is there a reason why it's a custom function setting, instead of just a dial in setting?

I have used ISO 3200 but only whilst 'playing' - If you expose properly then it's not too bad really, you can always remove noise with various filters or plugins in PS or Neat Image etc. to help.

I think it's a custom function because it is not an actual ISO setting as such, but simply a doubling of 1600 electronically, a bit like a digital zoom on a p&s camera - I'm sure I read that somewhere, but can't recall where. Canon obviously don't think it's that good but if you really want it you can turn the option to use it on.
Of course I stand to be corrected on this last comment...


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
May 23, 2006 07:37 |  #15

I have used ISO 3200 many times when in a pinch. Very usable with Neat Image or Noise Ninja afterwards. Its better to get a good grainy image than a blurry clean image.


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,458 views & 0 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it.
iso speed
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1866 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.