what is the benefit to shooting RAW+JPEG, verses straight RAW?
r2d2 Member 167 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | May 25, 2006 12:17 | #1 what is the benefit to shooting RAW+JPEG, verses straight RAW?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GNMink Senior Member 381 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Huntsville, AL USA More info | May 25, 2006 12:20 | #2 The only advantage I know of, it gives you a preview for software and a I use the JPEG to compare with my post process pics Canon G7 & SD800 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
so, is the general recomendation RAW+sm JPEG? How about the compression (fine vs. normal)?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | May 25, 2006 12:30 | #4 I always shoot RAW + Large JPG. That way, I can use the .JPG files for a quick (no post-processing) preview of the shoot. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper 6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | I shoot RAW+JPG Fine. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide 20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | May 25, 2006 12:37 | #6 I shoot RAW only. I don't see the benefit for me personally in doing otherwise. There is no real handling difference using RAW or JPG, and RAW is just so much more information packed and easy to draw good results from. But whatever works for each individual is the right way to go. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | May 25, 2006 12:42 | #7 I shoot RAW+large JPEG and haven't regreted that. I also review in software and download everything I take from CF card to CD or Hard drive or both. Can't stand losing the captures. When I go on vacation, I will take a portable hard drive, but 4 1gb cards seem to do the trick for me with only 84 captures per card at a time. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottE Goldmember 3,179 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2004 Location: Kelowna, Canada More info | May 25, 2006 13:15 | #8 I just shoot RAW most of the time. If I want a quick view of my photos I just run a slide show using either RawShooter or Breezbrowser. The only time I bother with RAW + JPEG is if I have to supply immediate copies to someone who does not have RAW software. For example a week ago I was visiting out of town friends who wanted a copy of my photos before I returned home. I let them copy the JPEG files from my Hyperdrive or Flashtrax. They can look at the images on their home computer or TV and I can work on the RAW files and send them corrected versions if they want to make prints.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sumozebra Senior Member 575 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Hong Kong More info | May 25, 2006 16:36 | #9 Well, i always do RAW + JPG. After the shoot, i immediatly burn the JPGS into a cd and give to the client, and then i tell them that the post processed photos will be delivered with in a week. that gives me time to post process the ones that we've selected with raw/TIF. Sumozebra Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cjsa Senior Member 646 posts Joined May 2005 Location: miami More info | May 25, 2006 18:31 | #10 I shoot Raw+jpg because one day I (hopefully) will get my act together and really learn photoshop (then I will have the raw shots) and for now I can just print the jpg's. -Carol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sumozebra Senior Member 575 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Hong Kong More info | May 25, 2006 19:21 | #11 actually, another major benefit of having RAW, is that you don't have to worry as much about the white balance when you shoot, since after u shoot, you "if u saved as RAW" you can alter the white balance through software, where as in JPG you're pretty much screwed if you do a bad shoot Sumozebra Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOS_JD Goldmember 2,925 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland More info | May 25, 2006 20:09 | #12 If you get exposure and white balance right at the time of shooting you can process your JPEGs and save a LOT of time. I shoot RAW+L JPEG. And as I don't always get spot on exposures RAW saves my bacon! All My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | May 26, 2006 08:19 | #13 I used to shoot RAW+jpeg, but now strictly RAW. My 20D allows me to preview RAW images and my PSE3 allows me to also preview and edit RAW images, so there was no need for me to have both. Saved me lots of storage this way. Then when I'm processing the RAW images, I "save as" in .jpeg for Web and as .tiff for enlarged printing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidW Goldmember 3,165 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Bedfordshire, UK More info | May 26, 2006 09:51 | #14 I usually shoot RAW plus small JPEG. The JPEGs are used if I want to slip the CompactFlash card into my iPAQ hx4700 for a quick preview. I don't need any more resolution than the small size - indeed, the iPAQ will choke on larger JPEGs because I haven't enough spare memory for the files. The JPEGs don't waste that much memory card space, either.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1270 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||