Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 May 2006 (Thursday) 12:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

RAW+JPEG vs. RAW?

 
r2d2
Member
167 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 25, 2006 12:17 |  #1

what is the benefit to shooting RAW+JPEG, verses straight RAW?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GNMink
Senior Member
Avatar
381 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
     
May 25, 2006 12:20 |  #2

The only advantage I know of, it gives you a preview for software and a I use the JPEG to compare with my post process pics


Canon G7 & SD800 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
r2d2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
167 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 25, 2006 12:26 as a reply to  @ GNMink's post |  #3

so, is the general recomendation RAW+sm JPEG? How about the compression (fine vs. normal)?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 25, 2006 12:30 |  #4

I always shoot RAW + Large JPG. That way, I can use the .JPG files for a quick (no post-processing) preview of the shoot.

Many times there are folks - mostly my wife - who want the .JPG as-is, and that works great when it's the best quality .JPG that the camera can make. I have the RAW file as a permanent "negative" and it's the source for any fancy editing if I care to do post-processing on a particular image (or several).

All it takes is a little more in the memory card department. Since I carry a bunch of cards anyhow (and everybody should), it's never a problem.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
May 25, 2006 12:32 as a reply to  @ r2d2's post |  #5

I shoot RAW+JPG Fine.

90% of the time, I post process the jpg. The advantage of having the RAW available has saved me the other 10% of the time.

The addition of JPG to the RAW seems to add about 20% to the size of each shot. Since compactflash cards are now free in each box of Crackerjack, there is no reason to not add the JPG.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
May 25, 2006 12:37 |  #6

I shoot RAW only. I don't see the benefit for me personally in doing otherwise. There is no real handling difference using RAW or JPG, and RAW is just so much more information packed and easy to draw good results from. But whatever works for each individual is the right way to go.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
May 25, 2006 12:42 |  #7

I shoot RAW+large JPEG and haven't regreted that. I also review in software and download everything I take from CF card to CD or Hard drive or both. Can't stand losing the captures. When I go on vacation, I will take a portable hard drive, but 4 1gb cards seem to do the trick for me with only 84 captures per card at a time.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
May 25, 2006 13:15 |  #8

I just shoot RAW most of the time. If I want a quick view of my photos I just run a slide show using either RawShooter or Breezbrowser. The only time I bother with RAW + JPEG is if I have to supply immediate copies to someone who does not have RAW software. For example a week ago I was visiting out of town friends who wanted a copy of my photos before I returned home. I let them copy the JPEG files from my Hyperdrive or Flashtrax. They can look at the images on their home computer or TV and I can work on the RAW files and send them corrected versions if they want to make prints.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sumozebra
Senior Member
575 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Hong Kong
     
May 25, 2006 16:36 |  #9

Well, i always do RAW + JPG. After the shoot, i immediatly burn the JPGS into a cd and give to the client, and then i tell them that the post processed photos will be delivered with in a week. that gives me time to post process the ones that we've selected with raw/TIF.

basically the JPG is simply for the immediate burn/copy


Sumozebra Photography
Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon EOS 300D IR | G9 | Lumix LX3 |

Printers: Canon IPF6100, Canon Pixma Pro9000, HP Indigo 3050

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cjsa
Senior Member
646 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: miami
     
May 25, 2006 18:31 |  #10

I shoot Raw+jpg because one day I (hopefully) will get my act together and really learn photoshop (then I will have the raw shots) and for now I can just print the jpg's.


-Carol
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/carol.albanese (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sumozebra
Senior Member
575 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Hong Kong
     
May 25, 2006 19:21 |  #11

actually, another major benefit of having RAW, is that you don't have to worry as much about the white balance when you shoot, since after u shoot, you "if u saved as RAW" you can alter the white balance through software, where as in JPG you're pretty much screwed if you do a bad shoot


Sumozebra Photography
Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon EOS 300D IR | G9 | Lumix LX3 |

Printers: Canon IPF6100, Canon Pixma Pro9000, HP Indigo 3050

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
May 25, 2006 20:09 |  #12

If you get exposure and white balance right at the time of shooting you can process your JPEGs and save a LOT of time. I shoot RAW+L JPEG. And as I don't always get spot on exposures RAW saves my bacon!


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48475
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
May 26, 2006 08:19 |  #13

I used to shoot RAW+jpeg, but now strictly RAW. My 20D allows me to preview RAW images and my PSE3 allows me to also preview and edit RAW images, so there was no need for me to have both. Saved me lots of storage this way. Then when I'm processing the RAW images, I "save as" in .jpeg for Web and as .tiff for enlarged printing.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
May 26, 2006 09:51 |  #14

I usually shoot RAW plus small JPEG. The JPEGs are used if I want to slip the CompactFlash card into my iPAQ hx4700 for a quick preview. I don't need any more resolution than the small size - indeed, the iPAQ will choke on larger JPEGs because I haven't enough spare memory for the files. The JPEGs don't waste that much memory card space, either.

If I really wanted the same JPEGs as I could make in camera, I could build them from the RAW files using Raw Image Task in ZoomBrowser EX. However, my workflow is completely RAW orientated, and I discard the camera JPEGs.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,976 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
RAW+JPEG vs. RAW?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1270 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.