Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 27 May 2006 (Saturday) 14:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

White Wild Flowers

 
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
May 27, 2006 14:23 |  #1

I dont know what kind of flowers these are, but found them in the woods near our cottage. This is my first flower picture and I would appreciate exposure tips on how to correctly capture white flowers without washing them out.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nwyman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,703 posts
Gallery: 297 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Maryland Eastern Shore
     
May 27, 2006 14:36 |  #2

they look like some form of narcissus?

Try setting your exposure compensation down a third to keep the detail in the whites.

nancy


EOS 6D, SX50HS, Tamron 150-600
C&C welcome and invited

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T.D.
Moderator
Avatar
33,738 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 239
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
     
May 27, 2006 14:46 |  #3

I agree on the narcissus call (think Daffodil). They're probably not wild, but rather someone dropped them there or a bird (or more likely, a squirrel).

White flowers are a real challenge!!!



Take a picture, it lasts longer (external link)
(My Gallery) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
May 27, 2006 14:55 |  #4

Thanks for the advice and the identification. They were taken about 30 yards from an abandoned wooden shack, so as you say they probably aren't wild at all!


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dimitri_V
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,221 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
     
May 27, 2006 15:09 as a reply to  @ nwyman's post |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

nwyman wrote:
they look like some form of narcissus?

Try setting your exposure compensation down a third to keep the detail in the whites.

nancy

I`ll agree with that,there is no detail in the whites.


My site (external link)http://www.earthsbeaut​ytours.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beckybun
Senior Member
Avatar
993 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: California
     
May 27, 2006 15:11 |  #6

Nice composition. You did lose a little detail in the flowers that are in focus.


http://www.beckybun.co​m (external link)
Canon 30D, 10D
Canon G6
Canon 70-200 4.0L
Canon 100 2.8 Macro
Canon 50 1.8 Mk I
Canon 20-35 3.5-4.5
Canon 420EX
UW Alumni

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
May 27, 2006 15:16 as a reply to  @ Dimitri_V's post |  #7

dv2004 wrote:
I`ll agree with that,there is no detail in the whites.

I agree too ;) yet the whites are not overexposed according to the software. I tried to recover some detail with PP but to no avail. Next time I'll correct the exposure in the camera and hopefully things will improve.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,289 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
     
May 27, 2006 15:32 |  #8

Here's another quick attempt at redeeming some of the detail in the white pedals.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Scott

Website & Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dimitri_V
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,221 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
     
May 27, 2006 17:30 as a reply to  @ sugarzebra's post |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

sugarzebra wrote:
I agree too ;) yet the whites are not overexposed according to the software. I tried to recover some detail with PP but to no avail. Next time I'll correct the exposure in the camera and hopefully things will improve.

I think that the best thing to do is to shoot raw,this way you can underexposse the image and have superb looking whites on a darker bg,it will look great.


My site (external link)http://www.earthsbeaut​ytours.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

791 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
White Wild Flowers
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2838 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.