Waldorf_Salad Mostly Lurking 18 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Morrison CO More info | May 30, 2006 12:56 | #1 I was at a local festival this weekend, and took a very strange shot. My daughter was riding on the pictured "train" down the street, and I whipped out my 350D for a shot. I had previously been shooting indoors, and had my 50mm f/1.8 on the camera, in AV mode at f/1.8. Obvoiusly, this photo was massively overexposed (the 350D's shutter speed wasn't high enough). My question is, why did the black asphalt street overexpose, but other, lighter colors, not? Polarizer? 350D + grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
re1ex Member 111 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: NYC More info | May 30, 2006 13:24 | #2 Waldorf_Salad wrote: Ithe 350D's shutter speed wasn't high enough). Thats your answer, the image doesn't contain any EXIF data so I can't confirm what shutterspeed you were using. But if its 4000 thats the max i think. 5d, 17-40, 50 1.8, 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
re1ex wrote: Thats your answer, the image doesn't contain any EXIF data so I can't confirm what shutterspeed you were using. But if its 4000 thats the max i think. What probably happend was the shutter speed number was flashing meaning, it wasn't able to expose properly with the given aperature. Thanks for the feedback. What I'm really wondering, though, is why would the black or dark grey (to my eye) asphalt street overexpose, while the lighter (to my eye) items like the pink shirt on the lady in the background remain not blown out? 350D + grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pieq314 Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | May 30, 2006 14:10 | #4 As far as I can tell, all the surfaces with direct sunlight are over exposed. Only shadowed surfaces are not. Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper 6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | May 30, 2006 19:06 | #5 Waldorf_Salad wrote: My question is, why did the black asphalt street overexpose, but other, lighter colors, not? Polarizer? Just to clarafy, are you saying that you DID have a polarizer on? .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yep, I had a polarizer on. 350D + grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper 6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | Waldorf_Salad wrote: Yep, I had a polarizer on. It is possible that the polarizer was rotated so that it selectively allowed the reflected light rather than attenuating it. This coupled with a metering for the shade would fit the results on the shot. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Jun 05, 2006 21:18 | #8 Permanent banYou probably didn't notice the 4000 blinking in the viewfinder when you pressed the shutter button down halfway. That means the selected appeture is too wide for the given ISO and shutter speed capability of the camera. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pieq314 Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Radtech1 wrote: It is possible that the polarizer was rotated so that it selectively allowed the reflected light rather than attenuating it. This coupled with a metering for the shade would fit the results on the shot. Not saying that that is what happened, just that it fits. Rad This could not be the reason. The sunlight is from the left, so that the reflected sunlight is unpolarized, so that the polarizer will not do anything (other than being a neutral density filter). Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JaertX Goldmember 2,018 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Amarillo, Texas More info | Jun 05, 2006 22:01 | #10 hmmm...hot day? tar is shiny. black or not, shiny means hotspots. Jason - I use Canon and stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dragulaz Senior Member 408 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Cincinnati, Ohio More info | pieq314 wrote: As far as I can tell, all the surfaces with direct sunlight are over exposed. Only shadowed surfaces are not. I agree, looks to me like everything getting hit with direct sunlight is blown out. The only light colors you see properly exposed are shaded. Bret
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zacker Cream of the Crop 6,006 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Oxford, CT. More info | Jun 06, 2006 11:08 | #12 whered you set the focus? im wondering if the meter was looking at something like the train or a colord shirt.. also, what metering mode was it in? this happens to me using the spot meter on my 30D sometimes, ill meter a nice bright flower and the background comes out either black or really light. http://www.theanimalhaven.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thornfield Senior Member 747 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2004 Location: Christchurch New Zealand More info | Jun 06, 2006 16:42 | #13 Here's my take on it. Relationships are like photography, it has to click.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevbailey Goldmember More info | Jun 06, 2006 17:39 | #14 at 1.8, outside on a bright day, even with a Polarized filter, you're gonna be slammin the sensor with a lot of light. You are probably within a stop or two because you did get the image somewhat. I think you can save some of the detail through PP. http://www.CherishMyPhotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 06, 2006 18:20 | #15 seems your ISO was too high, and you metered off the dark black of the train. Matt Bennell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1677 guests, 94 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||