Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 30 May 2006 (Tuesday) 12:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Weird Effect -- Why did this happen?

 
Waldorf_Salad
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Morrison CO
     
May 30, 2006 12:56 |  #1

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y59/SunneofKornne/IMG_0934.jpg

I was at a local festival this weekend, and took a very strange shot. My daughter was riding on the pictured "train" down the street, and I whipped out my 350D for a shot. I had previously been shooting indoors, and had my 50mm f/1.8 on the camera, in AV mode at f/1.8. Obvoiusly, this photo was massively overexposed (the 350D's shutter speed wasn't high enough).

My question is, why did the black asphalt street overexpose, but other, lighter colors, not? Polarizer?

350D + grip
Kit Lens
Thrifty Fifty
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro
Canon extension Tubes
Speedlights 550EX and MR-14EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
re1ex
Member
Avatar
111 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: NYC
     
May 30, 2006 13:24 |  #2

Waldorf_Salad wrote:
Ithe 350D's shutter speed wasn't high enough).

Thats your answer, the image doesn't contain any EXIF data so I can't confirm what shutterspeed you were using. But if its 4000 thats the max i think.

What probably happend was the shutter speed number was flashing meaning, it wasn't able to expose properly with the given aperature.


5d, 17-40, 50 1.8, 85 1.8
My pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Waldorf_Salad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Morrison CO
     
May 30, 2006 13:58 as a reply to  @ re1ex's post |  #3

re1ex wrote:
Thats your answer, the image doesn't contain any EXIF data so I can't confirm what shutterspeed you were using. But if its 4000 thats the max i think.

What probably happend was the shutter speed number was flashing meaning, it wasn't able to expose properly with the given aperature.

Thanks for the feedback. What I'm really wondering, though, is why would the black or dark grey (to my eye) asphalt street overexpose, while the lighter (to my eye) items like the pink shirt on the lady in the background remain not blown out?


350D + grip
Kit Lens
Thrifty Fifty
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro
Canon extension Tubes
Speedlights 550EX and MR-14EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pieq314
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
May 30, 2006 14:10 |  #4

As far as I can tell, all the surfaces with direct sunlight are over exposed. Only shadowed surfaces are not.


Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
May 30, 2006 19:06 |  #5

Waldorf_Salad wrote:
My question is, why did the black asphalt street overexpose, but other, lighter colors, not? Polarizer?

Just to clarafy, are you saying that you DID have a polarizer on?

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Waldorf_Salad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Morrison CO
     
Jun 05, 2006 08:52 as a reply to  @ Radtech1's post |  #6

Yep, I had a polarizer on.


350D + grip
Kit Lens
Thrifty Fifty
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro
Canon extension Tubes
Speedlights 550EX and MR-14EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jun 05, 2006 11:58 as a reply to  @ Waldorf_Salad's post |  #7

Waldorf_Salad wrote:
Yep, I had a polarizer on.

It is possible that the polarizer was rotated so that it selectively allowed the reflected light rather than attenuating it. This coupled with a metering for the shade would fit the results on the shot.

Not saying that that is what happened, just that it fits.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 05, 2006 21:18 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

You probably didn't notice the 4000 blinking in the viewfinder when you pressed the shutter button down halfway. That means the selected appeture is too wide for the given ISO and shutter speed capability of the camera.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pieq314
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Jun 05, 2006 21:59 as a reply to  @ Radtech1's post |  #9

Radtech1 wrote:
It is possible that the polarizer was rotated so that it selectively allowed the reflected light rather than attenuating it. This coupled with a metering for the shade would fit the results on the shot.

Not saying that that is what happened, just that it fits.

Rad

This could not be the reason. The sunlight is from the left, so that the reflected sunlight is unpolarized, so that the polarizer will not do anything (other than being a neutral density filter).

The reason for this effect is straight forward: The bright surfaces (with direct sunlight) are all over exposed, and the shadowed surfaces are more or less normally exposed.


Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaertX
Goldmember
Avatar
2,018 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Amarillo, Texas
     
Jun 05, 2006 22:01 |  #10

hmmm...hot day? tar is shiny. black or not, shiny means hotspots.


Jason - I use Canon and stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dragulaz
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Jun 06, 2006 11:04 as a reply to  @ pieq314's post |  #11

pieq314 wrote:
As far as I can tell, all the surfaces with direct sunlight are over exposed. Only shadowed surfaces are not.

I agree, looks to me like everything getting hit with direct sunlight is blown out. The only light colors you see properly exposed are shaded.


Bret
---------------
Canon EOS 5D, various lenses, Elinchrom studio lighting, and other "goodies"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zacker
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,006 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, CT.
     
Jun 06, 2006 11:08 |  #12

whered you set the focus? im wondering if the meter was looking at something like the train or a colord shirt.. also, what metering mode was it in? this happens to me using the spot meter on my 30D sometimes, ill meter a nice bright flower and the background comes out either black or really light.
-zacker-


http://www.theanimalha​ven.com (external link)
My Facebook, Friend me If you want!http://www.facebook.co​m/brokenfencephotograp​hy (external link)

http://www.facebook.co​m/theanimalhaven?ref=t​s (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thornfield
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
     
Jun 06, 2006 16:42 |  #13

Here's my take on it.
Things that have been mentioned already.
1)All the shadow areas are correctly exposed so the camera exposed for the shadow side of things.
2) You were shooting at f1.8 in AV mode from shooting indoors.

The unknown factors are:
What ISO did you have the camera set on?
What metering mode was it set on?

If you were at 1.8 and you had a high ISO then yes you would over expose as the shutter wouldn't get high enough.


Relationships are like photography, it has to click. :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevbailey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,008 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 771
Joined May 2006
Location: Inland Empire-Southern Cal
     
Jun 06, 2006 17:39 |  #14

at 1.8, outside on a bright day, even with a Polarized filter, you're gonna be slammin the sensor with a lot of light. You are probably within a stop or two because you did get the image somewhat. I think you can save some of the detail through PP.


http://www.CherishMyPh​otos.com (external link)Riverside Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattyB
Goldmember
Avatar
1,673 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 37
Joined May 2005
Location: Queenstown, NZ
     
Jun 06, 2006 18:20 |  #15

seems your ISO was too high, and you metered off the dark black of the train.

you'll learn ways around it when you venture into manual mode.


Matt Bennell
Camera: Canon EOS 80D DSLR Black
Extras: 18-55mm, 10-18mm, Tripod, ND8
Field: These days you'll likely be seeing plenty of Nature and Landscape posts :lol:
New Site In Progress -> bennell.co.nz (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,054 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Weird Effect -- Why did this happen?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
1677 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.