Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 12 Jun 2006 (Monday) 05:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Light !! (or lack of it )

 
ned1
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.
     
Jun 12, 2006 05:47 |  #1

Hi all,
As a newbie and trying to take photos with a real camera (350D) without it being in full auto of motorcycles racing and (very) slowly improving, my latest problem is light (or the lack of it)
I was out at a race track this weekend, temp in the 30c's and lots of sun,
but my photo's look dark, and looking at other photo's on this site I have got something very wrong, please help
Ned
see below.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


350D, 17-85 IS 4-5.6, 70-300 IS 4-5.6, 70-200L F4, 100 macro EF USM, Kenko 1.4x, BG-E3 Battery grip, Speedlite 420EX, + bits & pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 12, 2006 05:53 |  #2

Your issue is metering, I think. That bike is quite reflective, and looks close to white. With light colored objects you need to increase your exposure compensation to anywhere between 1 and 2, for dark objects you decrease it by a similar amount. One good solution is to take some test shots, work out what shutter speed, ISO, and aperture work, dialing it in as manual, and sticking with that. Just watch the histogram to make sure the light hasn't changed too much, just tweak the exposure a bit if you need to.

That shot is ISO 200, if you need more shutter speed don't forget you can go up to ISO 1600. Even ISO 1600 shots look great printed at 6x4 or even larger, it's only when you pixel peep that it's an issue. I've had ISO 1600 shots printed 20 inches accross and they look fine.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ned1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.
     
Jun 12, 2006 06:28 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #3

Thanks for that,
But why is the one below dark, it seems I have a basic setting way off :(
What would be a good place to start with the settings ?
I had it on aperture priority with it as low as possible (f4.5) and let the speed
take care of itself.
As I am new to this, I need basic help with the settings with a starting point and go from there :confused:

Ned

www.hrdcomet.net (external link)


350D, 17-85 IS 4-5.6, 70-300 IS 4-5.6, 70-200L F4, 100 macro EF USM, Kenko 1.4x, BG-E3 Battery grip, Speedlite 420EX, + bits & pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ned1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.
     
Jun 12, 2006 06:30 as a reply to  @ ned1's post |  #4

:o and this is the photo :o


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


350D, 17-85 IS 4-5.6, 70-300 IS 4-5.6, 70-200L F4, 100 macro EF USM, Kenko 1.4x, BG-E3 Battery grip, Speedlite 420EX, + bits & pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jun 12, 2006 06:47 |  #5

It's obvious that you need to gain control of the metering in the camera. Using the automated "pattern" mode will work at times, but apparently not here.

I suspect the problem with the second shot is the reflection of the sun off the windshield (sorry - windscreen :p ). That is an extremely bright part of the subject and probably make the camera reduce the exposure setting accordingly. The result, of course, is that you lose shadow detail and the overall photo is a little underexposed.

I prefer to shoot in M mode most of the time. This allows me to carefully meter for the available light and then the camera will ignore the variables such as cars coming past with different brightness paint jobs, etc.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardtheSane
Goldmember
Avatar
3,011 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
     
Jun 12, 2006 06:51 |  #6

Hiya

What metering mode and camera mode were you using?

Also for motorsports getting the highest possible shutter speed is not paramount, in fact the lower speeds (around 1/320th) are better as they convey a sense of motion.

When I shoot trackside I find myself dropping into M mode because the exposure varies so much from car to car. So I meter off the grass or a neutral grey part of the track and set the exposure from there - or if I remembered it I use a lightmeter :)


If in doubt, I shut up...

Gear: 40D, 12-24mm AT-X Pro, 17-85mm, Sigma 150mm Macro Sigma 100-300 F4, 550EX, other stuff that probably helps me on my way.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 12, 2006 06:58 |  #7

The road is quite light colored, plus like skip said the reflection is probably a factor too. Play with your exposure compensation and shoot different colored things, watch your histogram, that's the best way to learn :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ned1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.
     
Jun 12, 2006 07:51 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #8

hi, This is great, all you trying to help ;) (a lost cause)
Because the sun was strong and the fact that the photos seem to be better
later in the day, could it have been where the sun was and the fact that I have no hood on my lens !!.
this photo was taken at the same time as the top photo as the bike rounded the corner (sun would have been at a different angel)

Thanks again
Ned
ps how do I meter off a neutral grey part and lock it in to use on the 350d:o


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


350D, 17-85 IS 4-5.6, 70-300 IS 4-5.6, 70-200L F4, 100 macro EF USM, Kenko 1.4x, BG-E3 Battery grip, Speedlite 420EX, + bits & pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
primoz
POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005
Avatar
2,532 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop
     
Jun 12, 2006 07:56 as a reply to  @ ned1's post |  #9

That's reason why I always shoot sport on manual. It's too difficult to make every possible compensation on the fly when automatics decide to go its way. This what is happening to you is pretty much normal thing. You have huge space around biker or car, which is much brighter then drivers face is. Automatics measure exposure so that most of photo is lit right. Of course most of photo is not interesting for you, since you didn't take photo to look how nice grass there is, but to have nice photo of racing car or bike. Only real solution for this is, to set exposure, lock it with manual settings and forget about too light background. As I wrote... driver is important thing not grass or road in background.


PhotoSI (external link) | Latest sport photos (external link)http://www.photo.si (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 12, 2006 09:22 |  #10

KennyG - Best use of location and AF points for motorsport
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=135409
Kenny on shutter speed:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?p=1497313
Why do you guys use manual? AV makes more sense.
http://www.photography​-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=130176
Sports Shooting Tutorials and Advice
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=135417


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ned1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.
     
Jun 12, 2006 16:04 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #11

Thanks to everyone how has tried to help,
I now have a idea of what I need to do to try and improve my # of keeps,
Yes I do take some good (I think) photos but the moment it seems to be luck more than anything else,
If anyone has any information that may help I would be grateful.

Thanks
Ned;)


350D, 17-85 IS 4-5.6, 70-300 IS 4-5.6, 70-200L F4, 100 macro EF USM, Kenko 1.4x, BG-E3 Battery grip, Speedlite 420EX, + bits & pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dgcorner
Goldmember
4,722 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: New Zealand
     
Jun 12, 2006 16:12 |  #12

Hiya Ned. You might want to invest in a book to get your exposure metering and subsequent adjustments spot on. I used Bahman Farzad's: The Confused Photographer's Guide to Exposure and the Zone System. I learn visually and this book has had heaps of illustrations to explain certain concepts. It is quite easy to understand. I got mine through Amazon.


John;)

Believe... Work hard... and it will happen!

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ned1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, U.K.
     
Jun 15, 2006 06:52 as a reply to  @ dgcorner's post |  #13

Hi all,
I have ordered two books on Exposure and also looking on this web site for
information on anything to help me understand how to get the best out of my 350D mainly with motorsport.
once again thanks to all
Ned
www.hrdcomet.net (external link)


350D, 17-85 IS 4-5.6, 70-300 IS 4-5.6, 70-200L F4, 100 macro EF USM, Kenko 1.4x, BG-E3 Battery grip, Speedlite 420EX, + bits & pieces

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,429 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Light !! (or lack of it )
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2189 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.