Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Jun 2006 (Wednesday) 10:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Scanning

 
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 14, 2006 10:53 |  #1

I finally got my new negative and slide scanner, the Nikon 9000ED. This will do up to 120 sized negatives. Sweet machine but damned expensive.

So I tested a 120 negative and scanned it in as a 16bit image. It came out to a whopping 525MB for single image. In photoshop if I do Image Size it shows that it is 4000dpi and the image size is the same as the negative 6cmX7cm. Photoshop has never been one of my stronger suits. How do I make this so it is a manageable file and still look decent. I sort of want to get this sorted out so that I have it right from the start as I want to start to scan a bunch of my physical files so that I can reduce the number of filing cabinets that I have full of slides and negatives.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Julé-Anne
Member
59 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Halifax, NS Canada
     
Jun 14, 2006 11:40 |  #2

Hi,
I scan, archive film and create a digital database for the National Parks as my day job so I should be able to answer a lot of your questions. I just have a few first to be clear on what you are asking. First how are you scanning it in to begin with? What size and resolution...high or low? 300dpi? When I scanned 120 negs I did them at a scan size of about 24 inches by 24 inches at 300 dpi. Of course you may not need them that big. It's best to scan it large and at a high res so that in photoshop you can reduce the size if need be and not lose any quality or have interpolation occur. As for the image size in PhotoShop you have all three boxes checked at the bottom which is incorrect. I think I usually have it on Constrain Proportions so that it will scale properly according to the resolution and original size. I think that the original scan is where to start. What scanning program do you use? Hope this helps a bit. If you want to give me more details I can help you more for sure!
Julé
they call me scanner girl here!


www.julemaletveale.com (external link)
Canon 10D
3 new lenses coming soon!
550 EX speedlite canon flash
want strobes...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon, ­ The ­ Elder
teaching fish to ride a bicycle
Avatar
2,490 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Warren, Michigan
     
Jun 14, 2006 16:06 as a reply to  @ Julé-Anne's post |  #3

SSIM - The people that make Eclipse fluid and PecPads, also make an excellent negative cleaning fluid. I pretty much agree with Jule-Annes comments. I would knock down your final file resolution though. If you are printing Dye Sublimation as finals - you do not require anything near 4000dpi.


A 40D, a 30D, some nice glass and a great Shooting Partner.
"...As in music, so in life."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 14, 2006 17:03 |  #4

Sheldon, what size, in pixels, did you want your scanned image to be? If know that, then you can determine what you PPI for the scan should be.

For example, lets say you wanted the longest side of the image to be 3000 pixels so that if you printed the image at 300 dpi, you can print a decent 10x8 picture.

So, take 3000 and divide it by 2.67 which is the length of the longest side of your 120 negative frame. That gives you approximately 1124 ppi which you can round up to 1200.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdommin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,206 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2002
Location: New Hampshire
     
Jun 15, 2006 06:31 |  #5

You need to decide what the purpose of your scan is. If you want the very best quality from the 9000ED, you're doing the right thing already - but I would only do this for really important negatives that you plan to make exhibition prints from someday. For other negatives, try scanning at 2000dpi or even 1000dpi (keep the magnification at 100%). That will reduce your file size. Also, if your negatives are exposed properly and won't need much post processing, you can try scanning at 8 bit. That will cut your file size in half.


Scott
http://www.pbase.com/s​dommin/favorites (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

915 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Scanning
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2184 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.