Thanks for your comments David.
DavidW wrote:
I'd skip the warming circular polariser, and go for a standard circular polariser. If you auto white balance, the warming effect will be cancelled out,
Why is that? If I use a colored glass in front of my lens and use auto WB, the image will come out colored. Right? So, if I use a 81C I should be getting some warming effect. Please correct me if I am wrong
DavidW wrote:
and if you shoot RAW, you can adjust the white balance to taste in the RAW converter once you're at your computer. If you shoot JPEG, you can still warm the photo in post-processing, but it's harder to make this sort of adjustment with a JPEG.
I intend to shoot RAW, but I am so bad at post-processing, I would like to do most of the stuff on camera 
DavidW wrote:
You can probably get away with using a 77mm polariser on a 67mm lens with a 67mm-77mm step up ring, which will cost you less than $20. You won't be able to fit the stock hood on your 67mm lens if you go for this option, as it won't fit around the ring and filter - though you could use a 77mm screw-on hood. If the 67mm lens is the Tokina, you may get vignetting from the combination, though whether you want a polariser on an ultra-wide is open to debate anyway (the effect can be very uneven).
The 67mm is Canon 70-200 f/4 L. You are right. I forgot all about that. I have used step-up rings between 52 and 58mm. I can always afford one of those
. Will it produce vignetting?
DavidW wrote:
Good quality 77mm polarisers are, unfortunately, not cheap. Of your lenses, the only one I'm not familiar with is the Tokina; I guess that may be the 77mm lens. I have a B+W 77mm Kasemann circular polariser MRC - around US$165. Multicoated filters really are the best option.
The 77mm is Tokina (12-24). I saw the prices. Pretty steep. Actually I was looking at Heliopan and they were in the range of $300. Maybe I would look for cheaper options. What is the advantage of using multi-coated and will that increase the thickness of the filter?
DavidW wrote:
Bracket your shots - not least as it leaves open the possibility of HDR. That will mean using your tripod, which needs to be steady. If you don't own a remote release, it's worth getting one, so as not to knock the tripod when pressing the shutter button. If you don't have a remote, you can always use the timer.
A good tripod will leave open the option of shooting panoramas. You really do want some kind of separate panning facility on your head if you're going to shoot panoramas, though.
I will remember this. I will try to bracket so that at least one shot is usable. But with my limited capabilities on PS work, HDR is just another term for me 