Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 16 Jun 2006 (Friday) 14:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

National Geographic Backpack Review

 
Davd901
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Niceville, Fl
     
Aug 15, 2009 23:55 as a reply to  @ post 8466200 |  #211

How much?


T4i | EF 28 1.8 | EF-S 15-85 | EF-S 55-250 | Tamron 70-200F/2.8 | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
implayaz9
Senior Member
Avatar
357 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: orlando/LA
     
Aug 16, 2009 01:03 |  #212

85 shipped


20D | 28-135 IS | Sigma 10-20 | 50mm | 17-40 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adamthejohnson
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 26, 2009 21:25 |  #213

lmitch6 wrote in post #2563642 (external link)
Michael,

The large version is huge, can hold more camera gear, but less 'other' gear, i.e. the stuff you'd want with you on a day-hike.

Ok wait.

Youre saying theres LESS "other stuff" room up top on the large bag than on the medium bag?

Me, I'm hoping to use this bag as a kind of end-all vagabonder bag, ultimately. If theres less "other" storage then thats a major negative. But the waist harness is a big, BIG advantage.

Heres some great shots i found on the interwebs,

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


It seems like, on the large pack, theres some extra storage even in the photo compartment.

Is the large pack REALLY almost 10 pounds. That seems ludicrous.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
implayaz9
Senior Member
Avatar
357 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: orlando/LA
     
Aug 27, 2009 22:44 |  #214

still have it


20D | 28-135 IS | Sigma 10-20 | 50mm | 17-40 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kevinbythebeach
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Orange County, Cali
     
Aug 28, 2009 01:27 as a reply to  @ post 1640187 |  #215

I bought the smaller version of it off of craigslist for 45 bucks used from a girl..came with a few lipstick stains inside and some un used condoms...hehe

I use it sometimes,,,but i find the straps are too padded and dont give enough in my armpit area,,,,other than that i love all the pockets...

but sometimes the large nat geo logo attracts alot of attention and I get asked alot if i shoot for them...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Sep 14, 2009 20:42 as a reply to  @ Kevinbythebeach's post |  #216

The only thing that's keeping me from picking up this bag right away is the fact that it says Nat Geo on it. I just don't want to come off as being a poser. haha

Other than that, based on what I've seen and read, it seems like the perfect bag to get.


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Davd901
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Niceville, Fl
     
Sep 15, 2009 09:50 |  #217

pxchoi wrote in post #8645056 (external link)
The only thing that's keeping me from picking up this bag right away is the fact that it says Nat Geo on it. I just don't want to come off as being a poser. haha

Other than that, based on what I've seen and read, it seems like the perfect bag to get.

Have a piece of khaki colored loop velcro stiched over the Nat Geo. You can then put what you want on or just leave the velcro.


T4i | EF 28 1.8 | EF-S 15-85 | EF-S 55-250 | Tamron 70-200F/2.8 | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kuba
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Oct 31, 2009 16:03 |  #218

pxchoi wrote in post #8645056 (external link)
The only thing that's keeping me from picking up this bag right away is the fact that it says Nat Geo on it. I just don't want to come off as being a poser. haha

Other than that, based on what I've seen and read, it seems like the perfect bag to get.

I don't look at it as being a poser, it's a great bag, durable and it's inconspicuous.
Normally I hate being a free walking advertisement for any company and avoid labels, but in this case, N.G. does great things for environment and the preservation of it and animals, so I don't mind in this case. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scopemaster
Member
125 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Dec 05, 2009 21:07 |  #219

just want to let You know , after actually seeing the pictures & seeing what You had to say , Im buying one !!!
Thanks for all the input !!!
Ray Watts
Canada




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scopemaster
Member
125 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Dec 05, 2009 21:42 |  #220

Sold Me Im buying one
Ray
Canada




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mashed
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: India
     
Dec 11, 2009 10:47 as a reply to  @ Scopemaster's post |  #221

Great Info everyone. I have the National Geographic medium shoulder bag and love it. But i'am also thinking about buying this backpack, for days/trips when i want to carry my tripod along with me.

That brings me to my question. Would it be possible for me to carry my tripod (a Benro Travel Angel) inside the bag?. By default it shouldn't be possible (the minimum height of the tripod is 36cm) But i'am interested in knowing if i can somehow push the divider between the upper and photo compartments aside and insert the tripod into the gap. Can anyone give me some info on this ??

Thanks.


Kettik (external link) : The Travel Blog Collective

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JEmerson
Member
205 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jan 16, 2010 17:43 as a reply to  @ Mashed's post |  #222

Can anyone comment on using this bag (large backpack) for hiking and camping.

Can I get a camera, two lenses including hoods (70-200 2.8 , 24-70 f2.8 ), tripod, one ND, one CPL, first aid, food for two days, sleeping bag and possibly two man tent in there plus a place to store/hold water for the one day untill we reach camp sites where water is usually available?

I assume it's waterproof or has waterproof cover.

Thnaks to anyone who's able to advise it will be greatly appreciated.

Josh


Site (external link)
[Work in progress- feedback appreciated!]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
purelithium
Blithering Idiot
Avatar
1,108 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 16, 2010 17:51 |  #223

Josh, Probably not. The upper compartment of the Large backpack is too small to be effectively used for any major storage. If you unzip the separator, and reorganize the camera compartment, maybe you could get some of the stuff in there. Definitely not the Sleeping bag and the tent. You may be able to strap that to the sides though. I would recommend buying a hiking rucksack and then modifying it to be able to hold your camera gear. it will be more comfortable and you'll be able to carry the proper gear.

Good Luck!


R.M. Gelan Hopkins
5D|Voigtlander 20 3.5|EF 50mm 1.8 Mk I|430EX
third element photography (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JEmerson
Member
205 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jan 16, 2010 17:53 |  #224

Yeah, that's what I had expected. Last time I couldn't find any dedicated camera/hiking bags large enough. I'm might try to find one in ashop to try out with the strapping stuff to the sides.


Site (external link)
[Work in progress- feedback appreciated!]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pickupman92
Senior Member
Avatar
698 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Orange City, FL
     
Apr 20, 2010 15:19 |  #225

looks like http://www.powermax.co​m …%2BProduct%2BSe​arch&src=g (external link) is the cheapest for the large bag. I have a 17" widescreen laptop so I guess I'll have to use the bigger bag. Should have the money in a few months.... hopefully ti'll be cheaper by then.


-Quentin
400D | 50mm 1.8 mkI |17-85 USM IS | Opteka Fish-Eye |Canon 200EG Backpack | SLIK U212 Tripod | Point & Shoot - SD400 | DicaPac Underwater Case for SD400
Southern Exposure Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

111,897 views & 0 likes for this thread, 99 members have posted to it.
National Geographic Backpack Review
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1749 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.