Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Jun 2006 (Saturday) 22:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What effects do you use most often on pics

 
SonyaL
Senior Member
609 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jun 17, 2006 22:45 |  #1

Talking about special effects.

After you are thru editing your pics what special effects is it that use most often.

For me its color to B & W conversion I use PSP to do this and the channel mixer settings. Then I add softness by using the soft portrait.
I dont just apply the soft portrait filter first I select each eye and the mouth then selections invert then add the filter that way the eyes and mouth are still very sharp.
Second would be sepia toning using virtual photographer.

Sonya




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkuenning
Goldmember
Avatar
1,505 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Claremont (near LA), California
     
Jun 18, 2006 01:44 |  #2

Back when an Olympus was my digital camera, the standard effect (on nearly every photo) was color adjustment to get rid of the excess blue. Grrr.

Since I got a G3, I hardly use effects at all. I crop for Web pages, and sometimes fiddle a bit with contrast or color balance. I also remove red-eye, and occasionally use a clone tool to get rid of a distraction. If I have a great shot that deserves it, I might desaturate and boost contrast to get a B&W version.

Sepia isn't my thing. :)


Geoff
All I want is a 10-2000 f/0.5L with no distortion that weighs 100 grams, fits in my pocket, and costs $300. Is that too much to ask?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrywoodenpic
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Saddleworth England
     
Jun 18, 2006 09:13 |  #3

I tend not to use the built in Effects at all.
Though I do adjust the custom Effects in camera.
I reduce contrast and sharpness settings to the minimum,
as these can be better managed in photoshop.
though I do leave the Saturation on the middle setting.

You can always increase sharpness and contrast in more subtle ways later, but it is harder to reduce them.


Terry_______________
Over 60 years in photography
wasted money cameras never on film.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonyaL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jun 18, 2006 21:54 |  #4

I am working on another page for my website and I wanted to show different effects.
So I am showing B & W, Sepia,Color with softness added and I need one more.
I was going to do painting but everyone saying they dont like that I really need one more for this particular page any ideas?

Sonya




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nancypics
Member
Avatar
206 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Delta, BC Canada
     
Jun 18, 2006 21:56 |  #5

I know it's cheesy, but I'm a sucker for brush stroke filters....


EOS 5D
f2.8 100mm Macro
(still saving for some L series lenses...)
Film: Contax/Zeiss
www.nancylovering.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonyaL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jun 18, 2006 22:25 |  #6

Would you mean like this pic?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyHobbies
Goldmember
Avatar
2,734 posts
Likes: 137
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA!
     
Jun 18, 2006 22:45 as a reply to  @ SonyaL's post |  #7

If you were refering to techniques instead of a single effect, I would say...
selective sharpening like HPF or Dream Glow (red channel blurred blend for portraits.).


~ Jeff

Canon EOS-1DX & 1Ds MkIII, 20D(IR), G12, G9, G5, ... Gear List
JMM Photography ~ Discovering Art in Everyday Lifeexternal link | Model Mayhem #675060external link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nancypics
Member
Avatar
206 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Delta, BC Canada
     
Jun 19, 2006 00:30 as a reply to  @ SonyaL's post |  #8

SonyaL wrote:
Would you mean like this pic?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Yeah! Exactly. My favourites are crosshatch and drybrush. I actually don't use them that often, but I find they can save a technically poor photo (i.e. noise, missed focus, etc.). Kind of fun...


EOS 5D
f2.8 100mm Macro
(still saving for some L series lenses...)
Film: Contax/Zeiss
www.nancylovering.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrewaaa5
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: scandinavia
     
Jun 19, 2006 02:30 |  #9

varies from picture to picture. not normally a single effect, but a lot of individual manipulations depending on image type : ) I have been using the lens blur filter quite a lot recently, and a set of 'cross processing' photoshop plug-ins, and an excellent plug-in for 'lith print' effect. The crop tool and 'free transform' are probably my most used if they count as 'effects'.


andrew crighton
website -- > www.butterpeanut.com (external link)
flickr -- > flickr/photos/andrewaa​a5 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonyaL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jun 19, 2006 07:40 |  #10

I know in the past some pics make for a really good sketch where as others look horrible I tried this one in a sketch and it did not work very well.
The model in this pic is our 3 yr old grandaughters shes my best model. LOL.


Sonya




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Jun 19, 2006 08:03 |  #11

Unsharp mask?

Now don't start laughing as this is not supposed to be a 'special effect', but when I finally tried that out on my G2 images about a year after first hearing about it, it was some kind of revelation to me.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonyaL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jun 19, 2006 19:12 |  #12

I have not tried unsharp mask what does it do?

Sonya




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rpolitsr
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,983 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Quito - Ecuador
     
Jun 19, 2006 19:48 |  #13

It does exactly the opposed to what it’s name suggest: It SHARPENS your images. In my opinion it is the best filter yet to sharpen your photos whit a minimum of adverse side effects.
The name comes from a well known process in a real darkroom were the photographer used an unsharpened copy of the negative in the process of sharpening the print.

As I did nothing but basic darkroom work, I leave the explanation of the film technique to a better trained photographer (Terry?)


rafael
Canon EOS Rebel XT, EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 II, EF 50mm f1.8 II, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, speedlite 430EX, basic filters set.
My photo galleries (external link)
Marketplace: PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED IN POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Jun 20, 2006 02:01 |  #14

Sonya,

the unsharp mask will make your images sharper.

Take a look at this thread: By popular request: Workflow tutorial

It's a great thread by forum user Schmoelzel (who I consider to be a nothing less than a genius when it comes to people images) about post processing on portraits, and USM is one step in that process.

Just look at the image he starts with and at the final result, I think you'll be as amazed as I was.

Before:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


After:
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



Best regards,
Andy

some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrywoodenpic
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Saddleworth England
     
Jun 20, 2006 04:44 as a reply to  @ rpolitsr's post |  #15

rpolitsr wrote:
It does exactly the opposed to what it’s name suggest: It SHARPENS your images. In my opinion it is the best filter yet to sharpen your photos whit a minimum of adverse side effects.
The name comes from a well known process in a real darkroom were the photographer used an unsharpened copy of the negative in the process of sharpening the print.

As I did nothing but basic darkroom work, I leave the explanation of the film technique to a better trained photographer (Terry?)

The origional Purpose of unsharp mask was to neutralise the fuzzy edges caused by poor focus.
On a picture of a black object on a white ground. those edges taper from black through grey to white.
To neutralize them, the negative was contact printed with a piece of clear film between the negative and the copy film, to give space for light to diffuse and make soft edges on the copy film. this was exposed and processed to give a mask that maintained those soft edges, but now of course it would be a posative.
When the origional neg and the copy posative were taped together in register and printed the new edges neutralized the negatives edges and made the print seem sharper.

Unlike unsharp mask in photoshop it only had an effect on edges, fine detail was not changed,( if there was any)
It was mainly done in process houses when the final output was to be used in printing books or advertisements, as it was a slow and expensive process.

Photoshop cs2 now has a super unsharp mask called smart sharpen, which is even better. than unsharp mask.


Terry_______________
Over 60 years in photography
wasted money cameras never on film.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,975 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
What effects do you use most often on pics
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1400 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.