Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 19 Jun 2006 (Monday) 05:36
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which compact flash card?"
Lexar Professional 133x - $110
4
5.6%
Sandisk Extreme III - $103
25
35.2%
Sandisk Ultra II - $82.50
42
59.2%

71 voters, 71 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which compact flash card? Lexar 133x, Ultra II, or Extreme III

 
drews578
Member
236 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jun 19, 2006 05:36 |  #1

Which compact flash should I choose?

Lexar Professional 2GB 133x - $110
Sandisk Extreme III - $103
Sandisk Ultra II 2GB - $82.50

Currently being used by a 10D but an undgrade to a 20D or 5D future equivilent is inevitable.

Thanks,
Drew


Cool stuff I don't want stolen. OS 10.7.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Jun 19, 2006 06:55 as a reply to  @ post 1632250 |  #2

Ultra III won't write noticeably faster in-camera but transferring to the computer it will be faster. I use 2G Ultra IIs and am very happy with them.


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Jun 19, 2006 07:21 |  #3

Another vote for the Sandisk Ultra II as sensibly-priced high performance card.
I use 1x2GB and 2x1GB UltraII cards on my 20D, and I have so far not had to wait for my camera (always shooting RAW+small JPG, but normally in rapid single-shot mode). The card is fast enough to empty the buffer nearly immediately.

The others offer an additional 5-10% performance gain, according to http://www.robgalbrait​h.com …ti_page.asp?cid​=6007-8198 (external link)

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foto202
Senior Member
Avatar
751 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Va Beach
     
Jun 19, 2006 07:24 |  #4

I have ultra II's 2 1 gig and 1 2 gig. Plenty for me.


Ed

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jun 19, 2006 12:07 |  #5

Ultra II. Shop around a bit on the Extremes, you may find them for a bit less and they come with a 2-card case and image recovery software. A bunch of us are gun-shy about Lexars after they had a run of cards that weren't compatible with the EOS DSLRs.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jun 19, 2006 12:12 |  #6

I have 3 Ultra II from Costco for $49.00 each. My son bought me one for my birthday. Now I have 5 1 GB CF cards. I'm such a happy woman. Go out and get a Costco card. It's worth it.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Jun 19, 2006 13:36 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Ultra II's have served me well. I just bought two more of them.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R_Metzel
fish stick man!
Avatar
1,455 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
     
Jun 19, 2006 13:42 |  #8

Ultra II's are just dandy. I shelled out the extra cash for the extreme III and really didnt notice a difference.


-Rob-
www.blacktiefoto.com (external link)
gear


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Kemp
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jun 19, 2006 14:46 |  #9

Same here Ultra 2 are fine, I don't think even my 1D2 will go any faster with an extreme 3. It might download faster to the PC but how often are you in that much of a hurry to download? The low temperature thing might be handy if you are about to visit the arctic or something, otherwise the Ultra 2 is the best value.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
michael_
Goldmember
Avatar
3,450 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: sydney...
     
Jun 19, 2006 19:56 |  #10

the way i look at it an extra $20 for Extreme IIIs isnt to bad.


ichael ... (external link)
vettas media (external link) (me) | myGear (all my equipment) | sportshooter (external link) (my sportsshooter member page)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grumps ­ Photo
Suffering Keyboard in Mouth desease
Avatar
2,012 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Jun 19, 2006 20:43 |  #11

ANYTHING BUT LEXAR

Nothing but bad experience with this product line. Thumb drives, cards, and they're service dept. Crap.


Grumps
(aka Jim or JAZZ D.P.G.)
1DsMKIII, 1DMKIII, T6s, D60, L's, DO, USM, other lens, flashes, studio gear (but no studio!) Olympus TG3
grumpsphoto.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 19, 2006 20:57 |  #12

I do mostly wedding work with my 5D and own three of the Sandisk Ultra II 2 GB cards. I agree with the comments about not going over 2 GB..... spreading the eggs out around a couple of "baskets." The Sandisk controller is well made and has good reliability. Drew, what sort of shooting will you primarily be doing?

After reading on Rob Galbraith's site I decided that the so called extra speed of the Extreme III would not really benefit my shooting situation. What I have works very well, and the cards were all purchased on sale for around $79 - 84.

- Stu


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
Avatar
4,175 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jun 19, 2006 21:16 as a reply to  @ sapearl's post |  #13

I voted for the Extreme III, but the Ultra II is not a bad option. A couple of things:

  • There has been a lot of chatter lately about conterfeit Ultra II cards on eBay and elsewhere. True Ultra IIs are a good product but beware of the scam. You can see the chatter here on POTN or google it.
  • Despite the bad run of Lexar cards, I would stay away from Lexar on a Canon. Lexar has incorporated 'Write Acceleration' technology into their faster cards, and they charge more per MB because of that. However, the camera firmware must support the technology to take advantage of it, and Canon doesn't support it. So you are paying for something you can't use.
Have Fun,

Rick

My Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Richard_Miami
the windbag plateau
Avatar
1,367 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Paradise
     
Jun 20, 2006 09:32 |  #14

I use a 2gb Extreme III in the camera virtually all the time. For the few times I fill it, I keep two 1gb Ultras with me. The Ultras are Costco bargains I picked up while shopping at the store. Couldn't resist. Right now, I am watching and waiting as the prices on these seem to be dropping daily. As I have a few long trips planned without the laptop, I would love to pick up a 4 gb or 8 gb when the prices drop. But I will definitely stick with SanDisk. Their consistency and reliability have earned by business.


I am the crispy noodle in the vegetarian salad of life

Gear

RSPhotoGallery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tweatherred
Senior Member
Avatar
476 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Augusta, GA
     
Jun 20, 2006 09:48 |  #15

I voted for the Extreme III, as the additional speed may be usable by future cameras, even if there is no noticeable in-camera difference right now. As was mentioned above, some card readers can take advantage of the additional speed, so it is somewhat useful now.

Having said that, I actually own and use Lexar 2GB cards. I bought them right before the problems came out, otherwise I would have gone with another brand, probably Sandisk. I had used Lexars with good reults in my earlier camera (Nikon Coolpix 5700) and so stuck with them. I have never had any problems with my Lexar cards and got good service when I sent them back for a firmware upgrade, but in your example, they are the costliest in addition to having a history of problems, so I didn't reccommend them.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,396 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Which compact flash card? Lexar 133x, Ultra II, or Extreme III
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
1243 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.