BearLeeAlive All butt cheeks and string. 30,200 posts Likes: 70 Joined May 2005 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Jun 21, 2006 21:59 | #1 I am looking a getting one of these monopods. Has anyone tried out both? I would like the lighter one for portability and I am sure it would work great for my 100-400. I would likely be getting a heavier lens in time, though that time could be a year or two out and I could worry about it at that time. The other concern might be the height. I am 6'0" (183cm) and the 1401 is 5'4" (163cm) but I would imagine that the ballhead and camera height up to the viewfinder would make up the difference (that and my eyes are part wat down my head too). Would the stiffness of the 1471 be a better choice, at 1.5 lbs without head it is twice as heavy as the 1401 and can hold 4 kg more weight (though like I said is not a great advantage right now), though the extra .7 lbs is not likely to be much of an issue. I'm thinkin' of getting the Bogen 486RC2 ballhead as it seems to get great praise around here, though still open to suggestions. I definitely want a ball head as I use a monopod for macro sometimes and get it into some real weird positions. Thoughts? -JIM-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Jun 21, 2006 22:21 | #2 Although I have not used the 1471, I have the 1401. It is very rugged and I really like it. I have a Manfrotto 486RC2 on it. I am 5' 9 3/4" and I never have it extended fully. I take it everywhere with me, which is the joy of having something light like this. If it gets taken, it gets used. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nation Senior Member 906 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: Sydney, Oz More info | Jun 22, 2006 00:02 | #3 I used to have the 1401 and now have 1471. 7D and lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearLeeAlive THREAD STARTER All butt cheeks and string. 30,200 posts Likes: 70 Joined May 2005 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Jun 22, 2006 04:18 | #4 The bulkiness would be an issue I had never thought of and the fact that the 1401 would then be more likely taken alone would be a good points kinda confirms my first thought, to go with the 1401. -JIM-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeTwelvePack Member 213 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Texas More info | Jun 22, 2006 09:16 | #5 I have the 1471 and it is my first Monopod. I don't feel that it is bulky or heavy, but I also don't have anything to compare it to. 20D / 24-70 2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeTwelvePack Member 213 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Texas More info | Jun 22, 2006 09:18 | #6 Forgot to mention ball heads. 20D / 24-70 2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 22, 2006 09:19 | #7 I have the 1471 and I'm 6'. Having a bad day? Feeling down? Bantar Gebang Attitude Enhancement Images
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1613 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||