Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 22 Jun 2006 (Thursday) 10:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

This is nice but needs something...edit request...

 
AccidentalArt
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Houston areas
     
Jun 22, 2006 10:38 |  #1

This pic is unedited, just out of the cam as a jpg and reduced in size. It's quite a nice flower, whatever it is, but needs something. I dinked with it for a bit but never came satisfied.

Have at it and let me know what you come up with.

Thanks
AA


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AccidentalArt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Houston areas
     
Jun 22, 2006 14:32 |  #2

what? no one feels like being creative and helping a brotha out? :)

AA


7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
muscleflex
Goldmember
3,013 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: UK
     
Jun 22, 2006 14:55 |  #3

you might need to crop tighter! but also you need to provide a bigger file for people to work with. i think this one is too small and heavily compressed!


:cool:Canon 1D MK III:cool: | Canon EOS 20D | Canon 16-35 II [COLOR=red]L [COLOR=black]| Canon 100-400 [COLOR=red]L IS | [COLOR=#000000]Canon 50mm II 1.8 | Canon 580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Jun 22, 2006 15:03 |  #4

Looks out of focus - like it's taken with an unsharp lens or was hand-held. Or was "soft" intentional? Soft does go well with the pastels.

Otherwise, I find the center framing uninticing. A pretty wall decoration but nothing I would look at and say "wow".

It's a matter of taste so that's just my .02.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AccidentalArt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Houston areas
     
Jun 22, 2006 15:28 as a reply to  @ NBEast's post |  #5

I just found the whole flower weird. I know the center crop is not right but put it here for editing like "this is how it came out of the camera".

As far as size, it's as close to the 100K limit I could get.

Maybe it is out of focus, I just can't tell. The colors hurt my eyes. Shot this last week in Amsterdam, hand held. Not soft intentional.

Thanks anyhow.


7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Jun 22, 2006 16:24 as a reply to  @ AccidentalArt's post |  #6

AccidentalArt wrote:
I just found the whole flower weird. I know the center crop is not right but put it here for editing like "this is how it came out of the camera".

As far as size, it's as close to the 100K limit I could get.

Maybe it is out of focus, I just can't tell. The colors hurt my eyes. Shot this last week in Amsterdam, hand held. Not soft intentional.

Thanks anyhow.

It's very soft (OOF). If you have the image on your computer at home, just zoom in so the flower covers your entire screen, you'll see that nothing is sharp.

This is a result of using a non-macro lens that's not designed for accurate focus at close distance, possibly using a wide aperture (yours is f7.1, not too bad for 135mm and well within the sweet spot, but DOF is still a little shallow at this distance), hand holding the camera (likely, since 135mm will exaggerate camera shake) , slow shutter allowing the wind to blow it (1/200th isn't that fast for hand holding a 135mm this close up - it's marginal), or a combination of all this. OOF is not a usual look for Macro photography.

Also; the perfect symetry of a straight-on shot is not that interesting, again that's just my opinion. Sometimes perfect symetry is a good thing.

Don't mean to sound like a know-it-all since you may already know all this. Just offering up one amature's opinion that it is very soft and why. :)

RE: Size. You have a Smugmug account. Why not post links to EXIF and the original image. Inviting edits on an attached image just isn't too useful except for crops. This photo probably needs some color and contrast work to do it justice.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AccidentalArt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Houston areas
     
Jun 22, 2006 16:39 as a reply to  @ NBEast's post |  #7

Thanks NB. Actually I'm really new and knew none of that. Thanks for the pointers.

This board is pretty handy and someday I'll end up with good shots.

Thanks
AA


7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
98photo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,419 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: South Carolina, USA
     
Jun 22, 2006 16:48 |  #8

It may be soft butI still had fun playing! Pretty flower.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AccidentalArt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Houston areas
     
Jun 22, 2006 16:52 as a reply to  @ 98photo's post |  #9

thanks 98!


7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
98photo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,419 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: South Carolina, USA
     
Jun 22, 2006 16:55 |  #10

Just needed to make it stand out a little. I never desaturate the bottom layer all the way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jblksmith1
Member
134 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: New Jersey
     
Jun 22, 2006 23:30 |  #11

That looks great 98.


Canon 20d
Tamron AF70-300mm F/4-5.6LD Macro
Tamron AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD
Kodak DX4530
Tamrac Adventure 7
www.pbase.com/jblksmit​h1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

865 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
This is nice but needs something...edit request...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2853 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.