Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Oct 2003 (Thursday) 15:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Flash - TTL & E-TTL

 
ShaneR
Member
36 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Oct 09, 2003 15:02 |  #1

I'm looking for a secondary, small, cheap flash for when the 10D built in is too weak and my 420EX is overkill.
Question - what's the difference between TTL and E-TTL?
I've looked at several 3rd party flashed that are Canon EOS dedicated, but most are TTL. Specifically, will the flash exposure compensation on the 10D work with these units.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Oct 09, 2003 15:24 |  #2

Shane, you have to watch out for tricky wording. Lots of manufacturers will claim that their flash will work with Canon EOS cameras, and that much may be true. However, Canon EOS film cameras tend to use TTL flash mode, and Canon EOS digital cameras tend to use E-TTL flash mode. Many flash units do not support E-TTL.

In the film days, TTL mode worked by capturing a bit of light intensity bouncing off the film surface and onto some small sensors in front of the film. That could tell the camera's automatic system what to do to the shutter or aperture to cut off excess light, and so the exposure would be correct.

Well, in a digital camera, there is no film! The surface of the main image sensor does not reflect light the same way, so they really could not use TTL mode. Instead, with E-TTL, there is a pre-flash of limited intensity. Some small sensors will read that intensity and then make adjustments quickly in the camera so that the main flash (a tiny fraction of a second later) will result in a proper exposure.

So, if you end up with a TTL-only flash unit, you will have to resort to shooting flash manually. That is not impossible, but it is a skill that the film oldtimers learned. One of the reasons that you purchased a new camera was to get the newer automatic features, such as E-TTL.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShaneR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Oct 09, 2003 15:30 |  #3

Thanks Bob. I'm amazed that Canon doesn't make a mid powered type flash (Guide 80 ft or so). I seriously doubt I'm the only one that dreads adding another couple pounds to the already massive 10D when I just need a bit more power.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slin100
Senior Member
976 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Cupertino, CA
     
Oct 09, 2003 18:15 |  #4

ShaneR wrote:
I'm amazed that Canon doesn't make a mid powered type flash (Guide 80 ft or so).

There's the 220EX.


Steven
7D, 10D, 17-40/4L, 50/1.8 Mk I, 85/1.8, Tamron 28-75/2.8, 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS, 80-200/2.8L, 550EX, Pocket Wizard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Oct 09, 2003 18:25 |  #5

ShaneR wrote:
Thanks Bob. I'm amazed that Canon doesn't make a mid powered type flash (Guide 80 ft or so). I seriously doubt I'm the only one that dreads adding another couple pounds to the already massive 10D when I just need a bit more power.

Massive? That's not massive.

When I go out for wildlife photography, I have my D60 camera, my 550EX flash, my 420EX flash, my ST-E2 transmitter, one to three tripods, and my Sigma 170-500mm zoom lens. Normally, I can find trees to hang the flash units on, but sometimes I have to use tripods for them.

The trailer for the lens is in the shop now, so I have to lug all of this into the woods.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaveG
Goldmember
2,040 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
     
Oct 09, 2003 22:21 |  #6

ShaneR wrote:
Thanks Bob. I'm amazed that Canon doesn't make a mid powered type flash (Guide 80 ft or so). I seriously doubt I'm the only one that dreads adding another couple pounds to the already massive 10D when I just need a bit more power.

Try a Nikon F3 with a motor and the 10D will be a lightweight. I got the BG-ED3 vertical grip to ADD WEIGHT since I think that the camera is too light otherwise.

As for flashes I routinely carry a 550EX and two 420EX's in my camera bag. I like to use the wireless TTL function that Canon offers and I never know when I'll need 'em, so they're with me all of the time. The weight penalty is minimal with these three flashes - they weigh less than my Metz 45-CL4 and a Quantum 2 battery - and the results are worth a little pain anyway. What makes my camera bag truly heavy are the L series lenses!


"There's never time to do it right. But there's always time to do it over."
Canon 5D, 50D; 16-35 f2.8L, 24-105 f4L IS, 50 f1.4, 100 f2.8 Macro, 70-200 f2.8L, 300mm f2.8L IS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShaneR
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Oct 10, 2003 07:48 |  #7

If you don't think the 10D + Speedlite is massive, pick up that film SLR that's been condemned to the closet ever since you got the 10D and see what you think. :)

Seriously though, I shoot mostly event stuff for radio stations and trying to manuver through a club filled with 1,000 people with this hanging on my neck really sucks. I'm not complaining, and I'm really happy with the 10D, I'm just trying to make my life a bit easier. I shall now investigate the 220EX.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
Oct 10, 2003 10:01 |  #8

Everything you want to know about flash with the Canon EOS system: http://photonotes.org/​articles/eos-flash/ (external link)


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slin100
Senior Member
976 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Cupertino, CA
     
Oct 10, 2003 12:17 |  #9

ShaneR wrote:
I shall now investigate the 220EX.

Beware that the 220EX does not have a tiltable head, so bounce flash is not possible.


Steven
7D, 10D, 17-40/4L, 50/1.8 Mk I, 85/1.8, Tamron 28-75/2.8, 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS, 80-200/2.8L, 550EX, Pocket Wizard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,783 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Flash - TTL & E-TTL
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1742 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.