MickEmmett Goldmember  More info | Jun 25, 2006 17:24 | #1  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. It seems to work although it took me quite a while to focus it in correctly with my defective eyes, I'm sure someone has done some guidelines on stereo's on here but it slips my feeble mind just who it was.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cgratti Lord_Malone, your still a newb...  3,315 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES More info | Jun 25, 2006 18:15 | #2 i have no idea what this even is or suppose to do, can you explain?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LordV Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006  More info | Jun 26, 2006 00:45 | #3 Good attempt http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator  More info | Jun 26, 2006 08:03 | #4 Nice shot, the head snaps into focus for me but not the body. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 26, 2006 11:21 | #5 If I stare long enough it all comes in to focus but not much depth to it, I'll try to down load that program Brian and see where I'm going wrong. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KraigC Goldmember  2,227 posts Joined Sep 2005 More info | Jun 26, 2006 12:13 | #6 try swapping the left image for the right image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chemicalbro Cream of the Crop  5,245 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: anywhere but here More info | Jun 26, 2006 12:16 | #7 nice try......... it does have quite a bit of depth to it...but as Brian says it looks to be slightly miss aligned.... Alan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 26, 2006 13:07 | #8 OK, down loaded the prog Brian mentioned and tried it on the same 2 pics, feels like a bit of a cheat though. Does it look any better than trying to do it manually, certainly not as time consuming.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chemicalbro Cream of the Crop 5,245 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: anywhere but here More info | Jun 26, 2006 14:01 | #9 it seems to align better in this version..... Alan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sando Goldmember  2,868 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Jun 26, 2006 22:27 | #10 No, the RHS one is way too low. - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Balliolman Goldmember  4,150 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cornwall/Kernow More info | Jun 29, 2006 01:12 | #11
Balliolman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2046 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Nice to read all this technical banter! Good first try; you will learn a lot in the process of tweaking this stereo, Mick!