![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
1/1024s | f/4.4 | iso200
C&C?
sando Goldmember 2,868 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Jun 25, 2006 20:03 | #1
1/1024s | f/4.4 | iso200 C&C? - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
glowie Senior Member 888 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jun 25, 2006 20:12 | #2 great shot! love those piercing green eyes .....::....:..:..:::.::....:::..::....:.:.:::....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 25, 2006 20:17 | #3 One cool looking dude! Canon 6D & 7D. Panasonic GX85 and a number of ever changing lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TurtleMan Hatchling 9 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Savannah, GA More info | Jun 25, 2006 21:08 | #4 A look of serious contemplation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnthonyJHowe Cream of the Crop 6,935 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Rhos-on-sea UK More info | Jun 26, 2006 04:42 | #5 Very cool cat, nice shot. Canon 5D + Canon 20D + Canon EOS 300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 29, 2006 22:22 | #6 Just to clarify something... The cats name is the Iceman, that wasnt a title for the shot or anything! - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Theres a bit of a blue tint to the pic - Your exif shows you had the White balance set for Tunsten which probablly wasnt right but I dont really know what the environment was. Anyway, I did some PP on your pic and this is what I came up with:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 30, 2006 00:32 | #8 Cheers, it was set to Tungsten... it was the first few pics i took with the camera - hence, I didnt know what settings i was using, you know how it is! - Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sando wrote: Cheers, it was set to Tungsten... it was the first few pics i took with the camera - hence, I didnt know what settings i was using, you know how it is! Cheers for clearing the blue hue, although I did do that originally but I actually preferred the blue - dont ask me why! Anyway, thanks! Also, how did you sharpen it, is it USM? Yes some USM. I may have oversharpened slightly but it was late
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop 9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Permanent bandkangel wrote: Yes some USM. I may have oversharpened slightly but it was late I think it was 150% .3 radius 0 threshold. Actually I wasnt sure if it was an accident or on purpose because the blue added the "cool" factor to the picture - until I saw the tungsten setting then I knew you prob set it wrong. And yes I do "know how it is" When I first started photography I used to mess up all the time with exposure and the big wheel on the back of the 20D. Once I messed up several hundred shots at a wildlife park and didnt realize the Exposure Compensation was set to Overexpose by several stops. I will never make that mistake again.![]()
My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | Jun 30, 2006 11:26 | #11 Cool kitty, He looks like he lives up to his name. I love his color.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2664 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||