Reaperman wrote in post #3469896
vkalia.
What I was trying to get across (and yeah I know I did it badly is this), out there in photo land there are some very good pics and some very bad ones. Pick up any Photo Magazine and try and find some shots with a 50mm f1.8. We know the members of this forum can take great pics with it as they have proved. But there doesn't appear to be any in the mags. Why?
I imagine it would be due to one or more of the following reasons:
1/ Most professionals use zooms for their added versatility. The quality difference is negligible when it comes to saleability of an image, and the zoom lets you get a particular framing/perspective without too much futzing around. I used to carry my 50/1.8 around but rarely bother anymore. At $60, I couldnt be ar$ed trying to sell it, but it doesn't get any use either.
2/ The 50mm is a bit of a "boring" viewpoint (and on a crop body, it is also not very useful except as a portrait lens). A lot of street photography is done with WAs (28mm or 35mm), and again, from a selling point of view, an extreme perspective or focal length makes an image more saleable.
You don't see too many images made with primes these days anyway.
Vandit