Just ordered one of these to play around with
should be here Monday. Sounds like I will be content based on most of the reviews here.
Just ordered one of these to play around with Eric Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flam Member 38 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Dec 11, 2009 14:11 | #3002 Tony-S wrote in post #9167601 Why are you confused? you have the canon 17-40 F4, this is the sigma 17-70 thread yo Canon 400D | Canon 50 1.8 | Sigma 17-70 | 430 EX | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Dec 11, 2009 14:59 | #3003 Flam wrote in post #9178528 you have the canon 17-40 F4, this is the sigma 17-70 thread yo I didn't say anything about the 17-40L, only the new 17-70. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lantz Senior Member More info | Dec 11, 2009 18:16 | #3004 AUtigers350z wrote in post #9176092 Just ordered one of these to play around with should be here Monday. Sounds like I will be content based on most of the reviews here.Looking forward to seeing the pictures you take with it. Flam you have the canon 17-40 F4, this is the sigma 17-70 thread yo Funny stuff, Tony never said anything about the 17-40 Originally Posted by Geoff_Shawcross Just looked at your gear list and you have the Canon 17-40mm lens, not the Sigma 17-70mm lens. That's where the confusion lies.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Geoff_Shawcross "Nuttier than a squirrel terd" 5,127 posts Likes: 13 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada More info | Dec 11, 2009 18:37 | #3005 Wow......some of you really need to READ THE WHOLE INCIDENT!!!! If a few of you would have done that, you would have seen that I didn't realize that there was actually a new model out as it wasn't shown when I looked at the website......But that there was a link posted shortly after that and I said something like, "oops, my bad.....didn't see that they actually did have a new model."!!! Geoff | SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lantz Senior Member More info | Dec 11, 2009 20:03 | #3006 Geoff_Shawcross wrote in post #9179931 Wow......some of you really need to READ THE WHOLE INCIDENT!!!! If a few of you would have done that, you would have seen that I didn't realize that there was actually a new model out as it wasn't shown when I looked at the website......But that there was a link posted shortly after that and I said something like, "oops, my bad.....didn't see that they actually did have a new model."!!! ![]() I wont yell at you like your caps did me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Dec 11, 2009 23:06 | #3007 No worries, all. The original (f/2.8-4.5 non-OS) is a great lens. I had it at one time and it provided me with some excellent shots when I had a crop camera. I'm sure that the new version with OS and 1/3 faster aperture on the long end will be a nice improvement. Go out and shoot some photos! "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Geoff_Shawcross "Nuttier than a squirrel terd" 5,127 posts Likes: 13 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada More info | Dec 12, 2009 05:12 | #3008 My appologies Lantz, I didn't actually mean to yell it (so to speak). I was already in a pissy mood from something else and I guess it was just the way you had worded it that kinda set me off. Lets just put the matter behind us shall we. Geoff | SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lantz Senior Member More info | Dec 12, 2009 12:41 | #3009 Geoff_Shawcross wrote in post #9182141 My appologies Lantz, I didn't actually mean to yell it (so to speak). I was already in a pissy mood from something else and I guess it was just the way you had worded it that kinda set me off. Lets just put the matter behind us shall we. Please. My appologies too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Geoff_Shawcross "Nuttier than a squirrel terd" 5,127 posts Likes: 13 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada More info | Dec 12, 2009 18:22 | #3010 I've been looking at the specks for the new lens version, and it looks like it's going to be very intriguing. OS was something I had been wanting on it for a while for one. Geoff | SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flam Member 38 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | sorry guys, i misread also Canon 400D | Canon 50 1.8 | Sigma 17-70 | 430 EX | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Swann1 Member 137 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info | Here is one I recently took: And a 100% crop of the lights in the background: Michael Swann
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pauly_G Senior Member 344 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Hamburg, DE More info | Dec 21, 2009 07:55 | #3013 One from this morning... flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Geoff_Shawcross "Nuttier than a squirrel terd" 5,127 posts Likes: 13 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Canada More info | Dec 21, 2009 15:45 | #3014 Well done Pauly_G! Great tone and shadows for a wintery scene. Geoff | SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tiger280e Member 65 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | try this lens for macro...and it's great and sharp in low light,... | Canon 500D | Battery Grip BG-E5 | 18-55mm |50 mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70 f/ 2.8 | Speedlight 270 EX | HandGrip MATIN | National Geographic Medium backpack|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1397 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||