Thanks steved110, keep the peer pressure going. I have sworn off the L stuff. I know, I know, I know, the L's are so nice, but they are real expensive also. I'll have to wait until, I mean, no more. Ah, an extra wide 17-40L, good choice. I'll have to keep that in mind. I mean quit trying to talk me into things. You guys are terrible, trying to lead me astray.
The Quantary is an inexpensive lens, but it seems to work very well. I have used it for about 6 months and I must admit it is ok for a relatively inexpensive lens. I mainly wanted to get a little more reach, and the IS of the 100-400 is a super bonus. I want to see how it works for me in the real world. I'll probably keep the 70-300 for a walk around lens for a while. Until I feel the need to get that 17-40L, now stop that, I don't need another of the Ls.
Thanks for the comment joe445. They are very nice, at least so far. I went for a walk along the river and took a few shots that I'm going through now. The dog just got in the way. I still have to learn what this lens can do and how to handle it.
This is my first real pic I put on the forum. Does it look fuzzy to you when you view it. After I uploaded it and looked at it it doesn't look anything like the one I uploaded. It seems to me to have a lot of fuzzy artifact looking things all over it. The original was so much clearer. I am wondering if I did something wrong on the upload. I resized it to less than the 800X800 and checked the size. Is there something else I should be doing?
Thanks
Jack