Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 11 Jul 2006 (Tuesday) 00:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What is the accepted norm for cropping body parts in a portrait?

 
SonicYan
Senior Member
599 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 11, 2006 00:14 |  #1

I often see comments where someone giving critique on a picture will mention that the picture would have been great if not for (insert random body part here) being cropped out. I'm just curious if there are any set standards as to what a perfect picture would look like in terms of composition. For example, a portrait or headshot would include just the head, or probably from the waist or shoulders up.

Hehe, not sure if I'm getting my point across. Basically I'm just asking if its acceptable sometimes to crop out some part of the subject in the portrait, like hands, elbows etc. Or does that just mean that I'm using the wrong orientation for the picture? (ie portrait vs landscape)


SonicYan, aka Mikey
Black Canon Rebel XT, Canon BG-E3, EF-S 18-55, EF 50mm 1.8, EF 85mm 1.8, EF 70-200 f4L, SunPak 5800D, Canon RS-60E3, Canon RC-1, Canon 580EX Speedlite.
www.madlightmedia.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saravrose
"I quit smoking dope"
Avatar
9,562 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Between here and there
     
Jul 11, 2006 01:02 |  #2

I think the rule of thumb is to not crop at joints. as for the norm I think that depends on what your going for.. accidentally cropping out part of one foot can look sloppy.. it's all a matter of perspective and personal taste..

sari


Canon 30D BG_E2 Grip Rebel XT BG-E3 battery grip
Canon 50mm f1.8 Tamron 17-50 f2.8
Canon 70-200f4.0L 100-400L aka (Chuck)
a couple of bags and a lot of big ideas
"The shot is in my head before it's in front of my camera...."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustKat
Sorry, I'm in a mood
278 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Jul 11, 2006 01:18 as a reply to  @ saravrose's post |  #3

I agree, I've always heard not to crop at joints. I think cropping at mid calf usually looks kinda yucky too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Jul 11, 2006 01:26 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

generally don't cut into the head, unless its a very closeup

don't crop at joints, avoid cropping the hands only to have the fingers back in or a toe etc

watch where you crop in relation to clothing


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ clements
Goldmember
Avatar
1,644 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2004
Location: this scepter'd isle (bottom right corner)
     
Jul 11, 2006 08:39 as a reply to  @ coreypolis's post |  #5

coreypolis wrote:
generally don't cut into the head

Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Jul 11, 2006 10:11 as a reply to  @ chris clements's post |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

chris clements wrote:
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

it dpends on the type of shot and the amount of person in a shot.

some fields like fashion are more apt to breaking rules than say, traditional portraiture.

It also depends on how far away you are. If its a full length shot and you cut into the head, whats the point? if its a head and shoulder shot, than sure


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghosh
Senior Member
Avatar
874 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
     
Jul 11, 2006 21:03 |  #7

can any one suggest me some link where I can get some fashion photographs to see and learn ?


#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Jul 11, 2006 22:52 as a reply to  @ ghosh's post |  #8

ghosh wrote:
can any one suggest me some link where I can get some fashion photographs to see and learn ?

Try Glam (external link)


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaertX
Goldmember
Avatar
2,018 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Amarillo, Texas
     
Jul 11, 2006 22:54 as a reply to  @ chris clements's post |  #9

chris clements wrote:
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

but I would argue that they're purposely breaking the rules, and that's a whole 'nuther subject.


Jason - I use Canon and stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jul 12, 2006 06:09 as a reply to  @ chris clements's post |  #10

chris clements wrote:
Style gurus would disagree strongly; check out any fashion magazine. Chopping the top of a head off is currently so common as to be the norm.

It seems to be the standard for television and movies too. Most head & shoulders close-ups crop the top of the head.
Elie


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blue_max
Goldmember
Avatar
2,622 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: London UK
     
Jul 12, 2006 06:23 as a reply to  @ tzalman's post |  #11

There are some who will never draw the line until they have the complete body in the shot. That seems a little limiting.

Fortunately, pick up any magazine, newspaper or website with pictures of people and you will see thousands of examples. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong, so see what works for you.

Graham


.
Lamb dressed as mutton.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonicYan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
599 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 14, 2006 16:11 |  #12

Oops, forgot about my thread. Thanks for the replies, I didn't know about that rule of thumb regarding joints. Thanks for the tip guys.


SonicYan, aka Mikey
Black Canon Rebel XT, Canon BG-E3, EF-S 18-55, EF 50mm 1.8, EF 85mm 1.8, EF 70-200 f4L, SunPak 5800D, Canon RS-60E3, Canon RC-1, Canon 580EX Speedlite.
www.madlightmedia.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 16, 2006 00:54 as a reply to  @ JustKat's post |  #13

JustKat wrote:
I agree, I've always heard not to crop at joints. I think cropping at mid calf usually looks kinda yucky too.

I agree. This book (external link) is good for posing and little things like that.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,582 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
What is the accepted norm for cropping body parts in a portrait?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1686 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.