That beam of light is really interesting and indeed almost look fake. I love these shots!
SHANGHAi Senior Member 257 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | Jul 12, 2006 18:19 | #16 That beam of light is really interesting and indeed almost look fake. I love these shots!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 12, 2006 20:46 | #17 Thanks for all your comments. The place is normally very crowded and you will have around 70% of your photos with someone moving into the shot during the 30sec exposure. The guides are very helpful though in controlling the crowds. But the problem is, you only get a few spots where the guides will prevent crowds from coming on. So shots become pretty repetitive. To illustrate here is a shot nearly at the entrance of the canyon. Nothing interesting (not for critic) but will give you the perspective and crowd Suvendra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Jul 12, 2006 23:55 | #18 Thanks for the reply above, that does help put things more into perspective. I guess my hopes of exploring that area for various angles and at diff times of day in solitude is just a dream. he he he. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tee Why wrote: Thanks for the reply above, that does help put things more into perspective. I guess my hopes of exploring that area for various angles and at diff times of day in solitude is just a dream. he he he. I guess the gang here is split (pun intended) on the beam of light coming through. What do you think. I'm supposing you like it b/c you uploaded it here. If you shot this in RAW, I think you can bring the contast of the light down and make it more diffuse. I'd like to to a version of that or a pretty contrasty b/w version of it too with the beam looking almost like a spot light for a dramatic effect/mood. Well to avoid the crowd, you can always go to Lower Antelope Canyons. Not as easy as going into Upper, but if you do not have to tag on your family, that is a better option. Though the probability of getting the light beams is less, but it does open up more colors and rock curves to shoot. I plan to go there next time I am around. Suvendra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zembu Member 55 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: San Diego, CA More info | chakras wrote: Thanks for your comments zembu. Let me figure out how to do that. Maybe burning a bit will help? No problem. Yeah, I would play with burning a bit, but that is just me. Canon 20D | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 10-22mm | Canon 580EX | Nikon N80 | Nikkor 22-80mm | Mac Pro Tower 5.32 GHz | Adobe CS2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TravisF Goldmember 1,180 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Michigan More info | chakras wrote: Thanks for your comments zembu. Let me figure out how to do that. Maybe burning a bit will help? I am no expert by any means, but maybe you can try this: _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 13, 2006 13:28 | #22 Thanks Travis. I will try that when I go home. Suvendra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TravisF Goldmember 1,180 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Michigan More info |
MazerRakhm Colonel Mustard 2,277 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2004 Location: Near Chicago, IL More info | Jul 13, 2006 13:39 | #24 Great pictures! Thanks for looking!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MazerRakhm wrote: Great pictures! That is one of the coolest canyons ever, I really want to go there one day. There are two of them. The Upper and the Lower. Best season to go is summer. Best time depends on what you want to shoot. Upper canyon is more crowded than the Lower. Mornings are a bit less crowded. If you want to shoot the light streaks, go at noon. If you want to capture the nice violet colors on the rocks, go in the morning. Suvendra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pieq314 Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Jul 14, 2006 12:55 | #26 Wow! Perfect pictures! Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobscape Member 203 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Jul 14, 2006 18:50 | #27 WOW, great shots, I wouldn't change a thing. Reminds us of what's out there in the "real world". Thanks for sharing. Bob.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Jul 14, 2006 22:30 | #28 Permanent banI see seriously blown highlights in those first 2 shots which kills the shot for me. The exposure should have been lowered to avoid such overexposure and try to lighten the shadows afterwards. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 15, 2006 07:24 | #29 Agree with that. I have the photos in RAW. Is there any workflow to supress the amount of blown up highlights? Thanks. Suvendra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Jul 15, 2006 08:38 | #30 Permanent banSee what your RAW converter tries when you open the file as it picks its auto settings. I use PSE3 and it tried to adjust settings to eliminate blown highlights if it can. If it can't, options are to pull back the exposure/highlights - basically underexpose most of the image during RAW conversion and then see what happens with lightening shadows and adding back in contrast afterwards. Those shots could be a lot darker than they are. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1166 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||