Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 11 Jul 2006 (Tuesday) 13:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

EF 24-105 f4 L IS as a walk-around lens

 
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,646 posts
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 909
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jul 11, 2006 13:22 |  #1

There's not really a question here, but I wanted share a few observations about this lens. I just purchased it last week and I have used it thus far for a glamour shoot with a new model and for photographing a large festival. I have the option of returning it within 30 days, but after these two shoots I'm definitely keeping the lens.

Here's what I like about it:

1. It's much lighter than my 28-70 f2.8L and although I haven't done any critical testing, it seems to be as sharp as, if not sharper than that lens as well.

2. The 28-70 always left me feeling short of reach at fairs/festivals, but using the 70-200 f2.8L was just too large and heavy of a lens to carry for hours on end, plus I couldn't go wide at all. The 24-105 focal length was perfect for the crowds, the festive groups of people, and for reaching out a isolating an individual. I've always liked that focal range, but I never cared for the quality of my 28-105 USM lens when compared to my L lenses.

3. The lens quite sharp, even wide open. The IS is almost silent, and there's very little vibration. It's sometimes tough to tell that it has kicked in. But, I can tell that it makes a significant difference.

4. The color quality of the lens is consistent with my other L's, and the bokeh at f4 is better than I expected.

What I didn't like:

Actually, I can't think of anything right now.

If this lens hadn't performed to meet my needs/expectations I was fully prepared to return it for a refund. I had read quite a lot of good reviews about the lens on this forum and others, and I'm pleased to say that the lens lives up to its well deserved reputation.

If anyone is interested, I'll post a few shots from the fair later.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Site (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
steved110
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,776 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Sussex UK
     
Jul 11, 2006 13:31 |  #2

It's a great lens, just doesn't go quite wide enough for my tastes as a main walk about lens. But I'd love to own one.


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stratrix
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Jul 11, 2006 13:33 |  #3

Thanks for the mini review! I am planning to get the 24-105 as a walkaround lens. I would love to see some shots. I have a question tho, do you know how it behaves as a walkaround lens on a crop camera? i have a 350D, and was wondering if an L lens on my camera is worth it.

Thanks.


http://photos.alexleek​t.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
Avatar
3,275 posts
Likes: 81
Joined May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
     
Jul 11, 2006 14:19 |  #4

Portrait examples can be seen where?


5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
Avatar
3,275 posts
Likes: 81
Joined May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
     
Jul 11, 2006 14:25 |  #5

Also, how does this all differ on the different cameras you have? EOS3, 20D, 1DMII


5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cobra351
Goldmember
Avatar
2,996 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Jul 11, 2006 14:51 as a reply to  @ davidfig's post |  #6

Well said about this lens, I couldn't be happier with mine!


Canon 5D Mark II
Canon 40D - Infrared Modified (www.lifepixel.com (external link))
Canon Lenses: 17-40, 24-105 f/4 IS, 100 2.8 IS Macro, TS-E 90, 70-200 f/4 IS, 100-400 IS
Canon EF25 II , EF 1.4x II

Smith & Wesson M&P 340CT .357 Magnum

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kster
Senior Member
Avatar
551 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: California, USA
     
Jul 11, 2006 14:51 |  #7

I also use the 24-105 as my walk around lens, it's a great focal length for FF cameras.


1DmkIII and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GNMink
Senior Member
Avatar
381 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
     
Jul 11, 2006 14:53 |  #8

It is perfect for FF, in fact it was released with the 5D in mind ;)


Canon G7 & SD800 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Jul 11, 2006 14:59 |  #9

it may be born for the 5D, but i also find it has done a terrific job on my 20D. still pull out my 17-40 when i am doing landscapes. but for daily use, and when i dont want to haul all my gear around, it hasnt really let me down yet.


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,646 posts
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 909
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jul 11, 2006 15:29 as a reply to  @ davidfig's post |  #10

davidfig wrote:
Portrait examples can be seen where?

I'm on a business trip right now so I don't have access to all the photos I've taken with the lens, but I can post a few of the fair photos tonight (I'm on the West Coast).

davidfig wrote:
Also, how does this all differ on the different camreas you have? E0S3, 20D and 1DMII?

So far, I've only used it on the 1DMII, so I can't say just yet. I'm planning to shoot more this weekend, so if this thread stays alive I'll have more info later.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Site (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,646 posts
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 909
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jul 11, 2006 15:34 as a reply to  @ Stratrix's post |  #11

Stratrix wrote:
I have a question tho, do you know how it behaves as a walkaround lens on a crop camera? i have a 350D, and was wondering if an L lens on my camera is worth it.

I haven't used it on my 20D yet. I'm planning to shoot again this weekend, so I'll probably throw it on just for the comparison.

An L lens is an L lens no matter what camera it's attached to, so if it's good on a 1DMKII, it will be just as good on a 350D, but with a different FOV.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Site (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,646 posts
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 909
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jul 11, 2006 18:50 |  #12

Sample photos from the fair:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Site (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Jul 11, 2006 19:14 |  #13

Does a great job on a 20D
Candid indoor Bridal Portrait

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Forth Road Bridge, Scotland
IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Darling Harbour, Sydney
IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RAitch
Goldmember
Avatar
2,917 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sarnia Ontario, Canada
     
Jul 11, 2006 19:42 |  #14

I've got a 30D and love it.
Sometimes I wish it had more "speed" than F4... but it hasn't let me down. Indoors I match it with a speedlight and get some very nice results (IMO).

It works well... and "YES" to the earlier question about whether L glass is worth it on an XT. Most people will tell you to buy glass first. Personally, I'd recommend a speedlight first (even if you don't do much indoor shots--fill flash), then glass, then body (as you grow out of it). Plus, glass holds value well.


See Through The Lens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,094 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 254
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Jul 11, 2006 20:49 |  #15

I'm going to buy this lens this week because I need the minimal focusing distance that it offers for product work.
I've done a lot of research on this lens, and it appears that there are only two major opinions about its performance.
A. It's the best lens in the bag. Period! Excellent sharpness, color and contrast. As good as any L!
B. It doesn't even compare to the 18-55mm kit lens. It has horrible vignetting at 24mm and horrible CA and purple fringing. It is soft on the edges and corners. It is very soft at 105mm.
I sure hope I end up with a lens that falls into group A!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,694 views & 0 likes for this thread
EF 24-105 f4 L IS as a walk-around lens
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is john_martin
506 guests, 345 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.