webejamn wrote:
on the cover of outdoor photography is the picture of "double falls" in glacier park, well it actually isnt named that in the park there isnt a name for it, its an off trail site, however since i live near glacier, i wanted to go and see this for my self, i was inspired by that picture. so i spent 2 days hikeing up on logan pass, much to my happiness i found place where that picture was taken, now mine are no where near as good as his, but for some reason i feel like a copy cat taking that picture, granted it happens all the time, what are your guys' views on the thought, thanks.
All depends ... if you are a profesional ... then shame on you (if it is an exact copy). Same place but different technique ... who cares ... right.
If you are a not a professional, then go for it. Emulating (a better word than copy) a good photo is a great way to learn. I use to be a photo journalist, when I first started out in the biz a reporter told me that if there is a story I really admired, then sit down and keyboard the sucker out ... copy the story. While typing the story I sorta got into the writer's head and appreciated how he/she took the story and why. When I wrote subsequence stories I remember the techniques and implemented them into mine. Same-o with photography, shoot some green peppers, shoot the 'double-falls', shoot Marines hoisting the flag over a blood soaked island, it's all good.
What is important is that you shoot and that your photographic skills grow. Emulation is a great way for rapid growth. What you learn through emulation should be applied to your individualistic style and work.