Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Jul 2006 (Friday) 13:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

OK, now what exactly does this mean?

 
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jul 14, 2006 13:55 |  #1

There is a term that I have been seeing quite a bit lately, and that is "pop". For example, take a look at these thread titles:

How to make eyes pop?

Any techniques for making images POP!??

Is there such a thing as too much pop?

How can I make these images "pop"

Make Clouds "Pop" in B/W

can you help me make it "pop"?

Which lens will make the picture POP?

Now, I checked all of the photo lexicons that I could find, Steves Digicam (external link), PhotoNotes (external link),Kodak Professional Glossary (external link), Kodak Consumer Glossary (external link), ProFotos (external link), Digital Exposure (external link), and even DPReview (external link) and NONE of them had an entry for "pop". The closest match was from PhotoNotes which has "Popping (external link)" listed as "Slides bulging out when in a slide projector, because of the intense heat."

That makes no sense within the context of the links above.

As far as I can tell, "pop" means "too much contrast".

Anyone have an authoritative definition?

Rad

[/minorrant]


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheSteveMadden
Goldmember
Avatar
1,229 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Florida
     
Jul 14, 2006 14:30 |  #2

With 1,900 posts, me thinks you're trolling (if that's the right word)... ;)

... but I'll bite.

"Pop", to me, is when the subject of a photograph seems to jump off the screen but you can't put your finger on exactly why. It's made up of equal parts appropriate DOF, focus, motion blur (or lack thereof), subject separation and composition, exposure, saturation and contrast. None of them can make up for deficiencies in any other.

Pop doesn't mean too much contrast, that's fake pop. It also doesn't mean a razor thin DOF. It doesn't mean too much saturation (My Kodak could do that) and it doesn't mean oversharpening (Yuk!). All thinks in moderation and concert contribute to pop.

I'm struggling here, so I'll just say it's like pornography in that you know it when you see it :)


Steve
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 30D, XT, EF 24-70 f/2.8L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, other EF lenses, 430EX, several 580EX II's, Pocket Wizard Plus II's, lighting supports and modifiers, etc etc etc
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blue_max
Goldmember
Avatar
2,622 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: London UK
     
Jul 14, 2006 14:42 as a reply to  @ TheSteveMadden's post |  #3

Opposite of flat.

Graham


.
Lamb dressed as mutton.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jul 14, 2006 15:41 as a reply to  @ blue_max's post |  #4

Search for threads in the people section by schmoelzel for examples of 'Pop'.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rumjungle
Goldmember
Avatar
3,120 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 14, 2006 20:00 |  #5

I guess it would the be photography's "it" factor.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigBlueDodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Lonestar State
     
Jul 15, 2006 14:20 |  #6

"POP" simply referrs to a photograph having a 3D effect to it.....the image just seems to pop out of the page. Most pictures are very flat. As was mentioned, the best example would be to look at Schmoelzel posts for pictures of Julia. Then you'll know what we mean.


David (aka BigBlueDodge)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon, ­ The ­ Elder
teaching fish to ride a bicycle
Avatar
2,490 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Warren, Michigan
     
Jul 15, 2006 14:51 as a reply to  @ BigBlueDodge's post |  #7

Try this - it works VERY well for most photos.

http://forums.popphoto​.com/ibb/topics.aspx?f​orumID=9 (external link)

Mr. Jalapeno is very, very good in this area. I have followed many of his suggestions and they work.


A 40D, a 30D, some nice glass and a great Shooting Partner.
"...As in music, so in life."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Jul 15, 2006 18:43 |  #8

I think it may be synonimous with high contrast.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrt05zx6r
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 15, 2006 20:52 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #9

POP! Okay, so I edited it a little....

[IMAGE TOO SMALL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Jul 16, 2006 06:52 |  #10

It normally means too much contrast, saturation and oversharpening, whatever happened to the subtle shades and tones of film? :-)


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,036 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
OK, now what exactly does this mean?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1667 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.