WaterLily wrote:
ok, so between the sigma 17-70 and the tamron 17-50...what are the pros/cons of each? I need to place this stinkin order and make a decision and if I read one more review Im gonna go crazy lol
(and I have to take my kids to a neighborhood party so I have to decide asap)
thanks so much!!!
here's an idea of what Id like to get:
1 x EOS Digital Rebel XT SLR Digital Camera
$674.89
1 x AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4.0 Super Wide Angle DC
$388.89
1 x Speedlite 430EX Flash
$239.89
1 x EF 50mm F1.8 II SLR Lens -52mm- USA
$69.89
Subtotal: $1,373.56 (plus shipping)
(tamron would be $60 more)
then adding the canon 70-200 once I decide if the f/4 is enough or if I need the f/2.8
I couldn't agree more with your planned purchases. Except for one thing: You should also consider the EF 70-300IS as an interesting alternative to 70-200L f4. Both are close priced, the 70-300 has more reach (to 300) and IS (which is far more important in the telephoto ranges than in the wide/standard ranges), while the 70-200 is a bit better built and f stop at f4 is a bit lower. BUT don't think the 70-200 f4 is better optically. I consider it a tie between the two lenses (and nevertheless the L designation, the 70-200 f4 is not better/sharper, its more solidly built and a bit faster, but not better optically). The 70-300 also has some UD glass which are found normally in L lenses. I suggest you read Stopjojo's comparison review and i suggest you compare them yourself. I personally chose the 70-300IS, and i'm not saying it's the better one, they are a tie to me, but for me, reach and IS was more important than L built and fixed f4. unfortunately, Canon doesn't have a 70-300L IS f4 at a lower price than the 70-200 f2.8 series. For you the choice may or may not be different.