Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 17 Jul 2006 (Monday) 06:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Composition - opinions please

 
JFK
Member
128 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Denmark, Western Australia
     
Jul 17, 2006 06:58 |  #1

I think I made a mistake by cropping the top of the tree in the camera?
What do you think? C&C is welcome.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


www.johnkrepp.net (external link) Canon 5D, 40D, 20D, EF 17-40 f4L, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, EF 24-105 f4L, EF 100 f2.8 Macro, Feisol CT-3401 Tripod, Feisol CM-1401 Monopod, Manfrotto 488RC2 head, Kenko 1.5 TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anshu
Member
232 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: New York
     
Jul 17, 2006 07:38 |  #2

Indeed, I feel that its a bit weird by losing the top of the tree. Can we see it with it?


Anshu
Canon 40D | Canon 350D | 430EX | Sigma 30 1.4 | Canon 50 1.8 | Canon 85 1.8 | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 28-105 | Canon 70-200 2.8L IS | Canon 100-400 L IS | Tamron 70-300 | Sigma 18-200
Collegin for now....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JFK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
128 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Denmark, Western Australia
     
Jul 17, 2006 07:57 as a reply to  @ anshu's post |  #3

No I cropped it off with the camera.
I think I will go back to the same location and try again.


www.johnkrepp.net (external link) Canon 5D, 40D, 20D, EF 17-40 f4L, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, EF 24-105 f4L, EF 100 f2.8 Macro, Feisol CT-3401 Tripod, Feisol CM-1401 Monopod, Manfrotto 488RC2 head, Kenko 1.5 TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Jul 17, 2006 08:48 |  #4

When you go back also try a vertical shot. The horizontal shot is great, I just thought I would suggest something different.


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JFK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
128 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Denmark, Western Australia
     
Jul 17, 2006 09:14 as a reply to  @ Mike R's post |  #5

When you go back also try a vertical shot. The horizontal shot is great, I just thought I would suggest something different

Thanks Mike, yes that is a good idea.
John


www.johnkrepp.net (external link) Canon 5D, 40D, 20D, EF 17-40 f4L, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, EF 24-105 f4L, EF 100 f2.8 Macro, Feisol CT-3401 Tripod, Feisol CM-1401 Monopod, Manfrotto 488RC2 head, Kenko 1.5 TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jul 17, 2006 09:40 as a reply to  @ JFK's post |  #6

With my eyes, the cropping is fine.

The shot is not a shot of a tree. If it were, then the problem would be the fact that the tree has no detail or texture. But, as a silhouette, it becomes a somewhat abstract composition of shape and color rather than a representation of what a tree looks like. An idea, rather than the thing.

So, taking it as a composition of shapes - not things - I have no problem that the dark shape touches the top edge. In fact, I rather like that it does. It almost looks like rivulets on a map merging together then flowing out to sea on the bottom.

Where I see weakness in the shot is that there seems to be too much uninvolved space on the left of the frame. Cropping the left would work, but a much better solution would be in a re-shoot. If you can, move the camera to the left of where you took this, placing yourself on the other side of the tree's shadow. Doing this would allow the sun to be on the left of the frame, rather than the right. The symmetry you would create would be a small, concentrated, very bright thing, balanced by a large, spindly, dark thing.

My 2ยข

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ericgtr
Senior Member
Avatar
508 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Portland, OR
     
Jul 17, 2006 10:30 |  #7

First off, this is a great shot! As for the tree, I don't think the fact that it's cropped off at the top matters because it's not the main focus of the picture from what I can see. In one of our conference rooms at work there is a picture similar to this and the top of the tree is cropped out as well and I never even noticed until I had looked at it several times.


EOS 350D
70-200L F2.8 IS
17-40L
50 f1.4
My Galleryexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JFK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
128 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Denmark, Western Australia
     
Jul 17, 2006 17:13 as a reply to  @ ericgtr's post |  #8

Thanks for your help everybody.


www.johnkrepp.net (external link) Canon 5D, 40D, 20D, EF 17-40 f4L, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, EF 24-105 f4L, EF 100 f2.8 Macro, Feisol CT-3401 Tripod, Feisol CM-1401 Monopod, Manfrotto 488RC2 head, Kenko 1.5 TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Jul 17, 2006 19:22 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

The space to the left of the tree adds nothing to the shot. If possible try and recompose with your tree at the left 1/3 of the frame.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JFK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
128 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Denmark, Western Australia
     
Jul 18, 2006 06:22 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #10

I went back today.
Here is the result. I think it looks a lot more balanced.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


www.johnkrepp.net (external link) Canon 5D, 40D, 20D, EF 17-40 f4L, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, EF 24-105 f4L, EF 100 f2.8 Macro, Feisol CT-3401 Tripod, Feisol CM-1401 Monopod, Manfrotto 488RC2 head, Kenko 1.5 TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ericgtr
Senior Member
Avatar
508 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Portland, OR
     
Jul 18, 2006 09:10 |  #11

I like them both equally to be honest, they both have their charm. Nice job.


EOS 350D
70-200L F2.8 IS
17-40L
50 f1.4
My Galleryexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anshu
Member
232 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: New York
     
Jul 18, 2006 09:13 |  #12

I like the composition of the 2nd quite a bit more, but I dont like the lighting at all in it. Somewhere I'd love to see a combo of the two that would be a stunning shot.


Anshu
Canon 40D | Canon 350D | 430EX | Sigma 30 1.4 | Canon 50 1.8 | Canon 85 1.8 | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 28-105 | Canon 70-200 2.8L IS | Canon 100-400 L IS | Tamron 70-300 | Sigma 18-200
Collegin for now....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,532 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Composition - opinions please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1698 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.