This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.
jl_moped Member 67 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Jul 19, 2006 11:06 | #1 This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment. jl_moped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 19, 2006 11:15 | #2 jl_moped wrote: This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment. This is probably not the problem, but I have eliminated most flare problems with my nifty fifty by removing the UV filter. Are you using any ?... --Mario
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AirBrontosaurus Goldmember 3,814 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Indianapolis, Indiana More info | Jul 19, 2006 11:15 | #3 I may be wrong, but I think the white dots in the upper left are bokeh, not camera flare. Chris | My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DonPowell Senior Member 461 posts Joined Nov 2005 More info | I had this happen to me in, the distant past, until I realized that my protective filter sometimes protected me from getting the shot. On film, it took much longer to find out that my shot was ruined. I stopped using proctective filters, unless there was a real need.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photobitz PlatinumMeasurebaiter 6,501 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: NSW, Australia More info | Jul 21, 2006 09:23 | #5 I think it depends on the shot... It may be a little distracting in this one because it is a fairly obvious light spot. You could always darken that area in PP - a couple of shades darker and it will be as good as invisible. Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hatch1921 Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 21, 2006 09:25 | #6 may be wrong, but I think the white dots in the upper left are bokeh, not camera flare I agree with AirBrontosaurus, I think it is just the sun reflecting off the water drops in the background...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Jul 21, 2006 12:29 | #7 jl_moped wrote: This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment. I don't seem to have flare problem with my 100mm and I often shoot into the light. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 23, 2006 01:20 | #8 Thanks for everyone's comment. I borrowed the lens from my dad and it has a metal hood on it. I am not sure if it was the stock Canon hood for that lens, but it looked quite small. There was no filter on the lens. jl_moped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Littleben Member 192 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Whitley bay, newcastle. More info | Jul 23, 2006 05:27 | #9 I love this capture i think that the glare blends in as a blur so your all right . Back after about 6 Years, once again being drawn into the world of photography.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1921 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||