Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 19 Jul 2006 (Wednesday) 11:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Camera flare always ruin photo?

 
jl_moped
Member
67 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jul 19, 2006 11:06 |  #1

This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


jl_moped
http://www.jslstudio.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoJourno
High Plains Chimper
Avatar
5,681 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Lago, CA
     
Jul 19, 2006 11:15 |  #2

jl_moped wrote:
This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.

This is probably not the problem, but I have eliminated most flare problems with my nifty fifty by removing the UV filter. Are you using any ?...

Nice photo otherwise, and I had to scan for a good second before I found the said flare.

Cheers,


--Mario
"Sensa luce non si vede nessuna cosa"--Lorenzo Ghiberti

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AirBrontosaurus
Goldmember
Avatar
3,814 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
     
Jul 19, 2006 11:15 |  #3

I may be wrong, but I think the white dots in the upper left are bokeh, not camera flare.

In any case, great shot, whatever the dots may be.


Chris | My Flickr (external link) | AirBrontosaurus.com (external link) | Peleng 8mm Fisheye writeup (external link)
Body
: Canon 5D
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4 L | Canon MP-E 65mm Macro | Canon 85mm f/1.8 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Don ­ Powell
Senior Member
461 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Jul 19, 2006 15:04 as a reply to  @ AirBrontosaurus's post |  #4

I had this happen to me in, the distant past, until I realized that my protective filter sometimes protected me from getting the shot. On film, it took much longer to find out that my shot was ruined. I stopped using proctective filters, unless there was a real need.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photobitz
PlatinumMeasure​baiter
Avatar
6,501 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: NSW, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2006 09:23 |  #5

I think it depends on the shot... It may be a little distracting in this one because it is a fairly obvious light spot. You could always darken that area in PP - a couple of shades darker and it will be as good as invisible.


Dan

My gear | Me on Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Jul 21, 2006 09:25 |  #6

may be wrong, but I think the white dots in the upper left are bokeh, not camera flare

I agree with AirBrontosaurus, I think it is just the sun reflecting off the water drops in the background...

Just my .02
Hatch


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,043 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47412
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jul 21, 2006 12:29 |  #7

jl_moped wrote:
This photo was taken with a Canon 100mm macro with lens hood, but camera flare was still present in the upper left corner. Does flare always ruin a photo or in certain case adds more interest to it? Please comment.

I don't seem to have flare problem with my 100mm and I often shoot into the light.

Make sure if you have a protective filter fitted it is a good quality multi-coated one and that both sides of the glass are coated. I use Hoya HMC Pro1 and have zero problems. B&H is another well respected make.

You might be interested in a trick for the 100mm. It has a large and very effective hood that is first rate for telephoto use but can be a bit too big for close in macro work. So I also have the hood for the EF-S 60mm macro that I use on such occassions. ;)


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jl_moped
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
67 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jul 23, 2006 01:20 |  #8

Thanks for everyone's comment. I borrowed the lens from my dad and it has a metal hood on it. I am not sure if it was the stock Canon hood for that lens, but it looked quite small. There was no filter on the lens.

Shooting macro it fun, but I am running out of shooting subject around the garden.


jl_moped
http://www.jslstudio.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littleben
Member
Avatar
192 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Whitley bay, newcastle.
     
Jul 23, 2006 05:27 |  #9

I love this capture i think that the glare blends in as a blur so your all right .

congrives.


Back after about 6 Years, once again being drawn into the world of photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,181 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Camera flare always ruin photo?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1921 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.