StewartR "your nose is too big"  4,269 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Maidenhead, UK More info | DocFrankenstein wrote: 1) My photography isn't serious... so it doesn't matter 2) Non-photographers don't look at sharpness 3) I'll usually screw up by misfocusing anyways. Couldn't agree more. www.LensesForHire.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elTwitcho frustrating as ....  1,478 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Toronto More info | Hellashot wrote: RAW files from a 22MB image will not be 75MB. RAW from m 5D are 12 to 18MB so 22MP would yeild 20 to 34 MB files or so. Are you by chance working in 8 bit? I work in 16bit and my 10D RAW files are either 20 or 40 MB (can't honestly remember since the first thing I do is copy the background layer) and because I work with multiple layers, most images end up being 200-250 MB which is quite large coming from a 6.3 megapixel camera. I plan on upgrading to a 5D and it's quite likely I'll need a computer upgrade along with it. 22MB images will become extremely large when opened in photoshop I would imagine, and 75MB seems reasonable, but that's only if you work on one layer which many people do not. When you factor in layers you double the image size, and so now you're looking at images of 150, 225 or even 300MB for a conservative estimate. Rich
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1686 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
