Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 24 Jul 2006 (Monday) 07:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Resolution Problem?

 
summer16
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 24, 2006 07:16 |  #1

I shot a photo of my car to use on a web forum. I’m using my Canon G6 and Adobe photo Elements 2. I use two computers, desktop and a notebook. When I resize my image for the web it looks good on one computer (desktop) but awful on the other.
When I preview the image in Internet Explorer or post the image in the forum it looks good on my desktop computer but the same image looks very poor on my notebook. By poor I mean squiggly straight lines. At first I thought the file size was reduced too much but after experimenting I don’t think thats it. Why does this happen?
All the other images on the forum are sharp regardless of their size when viewed on either my notebook or my desktop. I wonder if other people see a good image or an awful image?

Link to Photo (external link)

Important Info
Camera settings:
Image Resolution: large 3072 x 2304
Image Compression set to superfine
Original image size: 1102 x 654 KB "after cropping"
Final image size: 816 x 459 KB
Smaller final image: 480 x 279 KB
Default desktop screen resolution: 1024 x 768
Default notebook screen resolution: 1680 x 1050


I have tried smaller and larger images but get the same result. I use a web hosting site for my pics.
Sorry for the long post.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Jul 25, 2006 10:39 |  #2

It looks to me like there is a problem with aliasing. That's where you get jagged lines instead of smooth ones. It's almost certainly an artefact of the resizing process you used. Most software applications can use a variety of methods for resizing (a.k.a. downsampling) photos. You might have used a "quick-but-crude" method (e.g. linear interpolation) instead of a "good-but-slow" method (e.g. bicubic interpolation). Check the manual or Help section for your software.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
summer16
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 25, 2006 11:41 as a reply to  @ StewartR's post |  #3

I used bicubic. I'm using Adobe Photo Elements II on a computer with an ATI Radeon graphics card with anti-aliasing enabled. Now I'm told that other prople say that my image looks great on photobucket. ????

For some strange reason my images only seem to look really bad on my computers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Jul 25, 2006 11:52 as a reply to  @ summer16's post |  #4

And mine. I've looked at that image on 3 different monitors attached to 2 different PCs, and it suffers from aliasing every time.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
summer16
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 25, 2006 20:06 as a reply to  @ StewartR's post |  #5

Please tell me what I should do to correct this situation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jul 25, 2006 20:31 |  #6

Jags are more pronounce in the horizontal lines then the vertical. It looks more like a compression issue. The problem might be from over saving in JPEG. Since the camera I assume is outputing the pics as JPEG and after you work on the pics in PSE you save it then downres the pics further for web might cause it to pixelated more. Usually when you downres a pic you are dumping pixel and when saving you are dumping more pixels and seems to be the problem w/ your pics.

Another factor is that P&S cameras use very small sensors and because the photosite are small the noise inc and when downres the pic you are loosing more pixels. So on & so on.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
summer16
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 25, 2006 21:16 |  #7

I shot this image with a Canon G6, 7.1 megapixel camera. I had the resolution set to 2048 x 1536. Did I try to reduce it too much?

What is the highest image resolution that I can use that can be reduced to 800 x 600 without any pixelation or bad effects?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jul 25, 2006 22:47 |  #8

In actuality cameras in general have only one resolution and it is the native resolution as for yours it would be 7.1MP so the lowest res you should shoot w/ is 7.1MP. Shooting at a lower res would only mean are throwing away resoluion w/ compression. If posible sshoot in RAW, I believe the G6 is capable of shooting in RAW. then during your convertion you can control the size of the pic.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

929 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Resolution Problem?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2267 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.