pfogle wrote:
looking on the positive, I've at last stopped taking pictures with the lens cap on
looking on the positive, I've at last stopped taking pictures with the lens cap on
Erm... you're supposed to take it off?:o
TeeJay Goldmember  3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | pfogle wrote: looking on the positive, I've at last stopped taking pictures with the lens cap on Erm... you're supposed to take it off?:o 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Littlefield Goldmember  More info | Jul 28, 2006 05:57 | #17 The one I hate is not having the IS on the 17-85 and then seeing pics realizing they could have been lot sharper!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bewaretheblur Member  195 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Lake Placid, NY More info | Jul 28, 2006 07:10 | #18 latest noob mistake: Bodies: 1d mkIII, 30D, 20D,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back....  38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Jul 28, 2006 07:10 | #19 Yeah.. I got caught out with the AI servo thing last night too. I wonder why I wasn't getting a nice "peep" sound on focussing. Set it back onto single shot and got the focus sounds back again..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
keithvr Member  152 posts Joined May 2006 Location: South Africa More info | Jul 28, 2006 07:25 | #20 Shooting with the lens cap on causes severe underexposure, and plays havoc with your shutter speed. Canon 1DsmIII,1DmIIn,1DsmII, 1DmIIIx2, 30D, 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kickstart Senior Member 384 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Stafford, UK More info | Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Plan9 Member 233 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 More info | basroil wrote: shoot w/o card is fun though. i've taken out the card and blasted away several hundred pics to fool people who get pissed off at my "monstrosity" of a camera (only xt+grip+70-200, i don't want to imagine what people think of a 1d+400mm f2.8). best part, none of the shots count towards your tally (go ahead and try, if you shoot 100 pics w/o card from img_0001, when you take a pic with card, it'll be img_0002 i use only a 1gb card, but i've taken several hundred raw images on it in a single day without access to a computer. for the price of what a 4gb extreme costs, i got myself 40gb and a 3.8in screen to boot. the p-series is the best purchase i've made besides my camera and the 70-200IS. haha yeah too bad the XTs are only rated at like 50,000 cycles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JamieHolladay Cream of the Crop  21,557 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Gadsden, Alabama, USA More info | I do the memory card thing a lot. Especially when I am shooting cars at work. I will grab the camera and the card is still in the reader. I feel like such and idot. The Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StewartR "your nose is too big"  4,269 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Maidenhead, UK More info | Jul 29, 2006 11:19 | #24 How long is it before you stop making noob mistakes? I've been into photography for >20 years, but still... www.LensesForHire.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Falkon Senior Member  442 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: North Carolina More info | Jul 29, 2006 18:29 | #25 My mom took a bunch with her point and shoot looking through the view finder back words. she got loads of blurry shots of her nose. There are 10 types of people in the world:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cathpah Goldmember  4,259 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Maine. More info | Jul 30, 2006 02:49 | #26 I once spent the day at the new england aquarium taking what could've been some pretty great shots with my old 300D....until I realized I had taken all of them at ISO 3200! Architecture
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StewartR "your nose is too big" 4,269 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Maidenhead, UK More info | Falkon wrote: My mom took a bunch with her point and shoot looking through the view finder back words. she got loads of blurry shots of her nose. That's the best yet. Priceless. www.LensesForHire.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stjhie Senior Member  267 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jul 30, 2006 03:49 | #28 Haha. your 300D can do iso3200? my 350d can only do max 1600 iso. any idea how to unleash the extra sensitivity? Stanley Tjhie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevbailey Goldmember  More info | stjhie wrote: Haha. your 300D can do iso3200? my 350d can only do max 1600 iso. any idea how to unleash the extra sensitivity? With the "undetouchables" firmware upgrade, you have the option of 3200, as well as some cusom functions. I used it with my 300 before I got my 20D. http://www.CherishMyPhotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pinto Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.  More info | keithvr wrote: Shooting with the lens cap on causes severe underexposure, and plays havoc with your shutter speed.  Not if you really crank up that ISO!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1400 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
