Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 26 Jul 2006 (Wednesday) 13:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tamron 55-200mm Mini Review with samples

 
red ­ hot ­ sheep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,576 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London
     
Jul 26, 2006 13:56 |  #1

I bought this after reading this review...

http://www.ephotozine.​com …estdetail.cfm?t​est_id=411 (external link)

... as I needed a cheap telezoom for my forthcoming holiday. In the review it stated 'Amazing optical quality for a budget lens' so it sounded great. Would mine be the same?

I ordered it from Warehouseexpress for just £99, and I placed the order at 1:56pm Tuesday, and the lens arrived 10:00 the next morning. Good service!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



Simple enough: box, lens and hood. The lens diameter is only 52mm! The lens feels quite nice for a budget model, obviously quite plastic, but it feels tactile and solid enough. The zoom ring is fairly free, and although the focus ring is small, it is also quite smooth (quite a bit better than the 18-55 focus ring). Also, the focus ring is not directly connected to the end as in the 18-55mm. The lens extends quite a lot when zoomed to 200mm, but at the 55mm position, it's nice and compact.

It does make a bit of noise while focussing, but it's fairly quick (not USM quick but not too slow), but it seems pretty accurate.

So I went off and took some pictures. This picture was taken wide open (ie f/5.6) at 200mm indoors:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



No PP has been done, this is straight out of the camera. Here's a 100% crop for those interested:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Now I think that's pretty impressive. That's handheld, indoors, at 200mm, wide open (f/5.6). Plus, the variable aperture doesn't seem to change from f/4 until quite late on.

Here's another picture taken, this time at around 65mm outdoors (again wide open - f/4 this time):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Overall, I'm VERY happy with this lens, especially for the price. And both the pictures above were wide open, and sharpness obviously increases as you stop down a bit. I had never thought a telezoom of this price would be useable wide open, so I'm plesantly surprised.

My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevNJ
Senior Member
366 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: NJ-USA
     
Jul 26, 2006 14:11 |  #2

Theres always a diamond in the rough. ;)

Seems as though cheaper ( money wise ) lenses gets over looked, and everyone is quick to recommend L glass, Passing up on lower priced lenses because "it must not be good cause why else is it so cheap".


Kevin
Thinking of getting a new gear, not sure if it's the right choice ?
www.RentCameraGear.com (external link)http://www.photography​-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?p=1713215

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ hot ­ sheep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,576 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London
     
Jul 26, 2006 15:27 as a reply to  @ KevNJ's post |  #3

Exactly. The 70-200 f/4L costs 4 times as much, and while I don't doubt its better, the end result probably isn't all that much different. And a good picture taken with a cheap lens is certainly better than a bad picture (badly exposed bad composition etc) with a good lens.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr ­ O
Member
136 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Manchester, England
     
Jul 26, 2006 15:37 as a reply to  @ red hot sheep's post |  #4

I bought this lens not long after I got my 350D. For the price, I think it's a cracking buy.

As I was taking a lot more shots of my son's football team and wanted to get into portrait shots...I bought the 70-200 F4L

My intention was to then sell my Tamron...but d'ya know what...I just don't want to let it go. :)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ hot ­ sheep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,576 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London
     
Jul 26, 2006 15:47 as a reply to  @ Mr O's post |  #5

I could see why - it's very portable and great for travel. :)


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Avatar
4,042 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
     
Sep 10, 2006 15:01 |  #6

Thats exactly why im planning on getting one, probably around Christmas time (another present to open! lol), I like the fact that its not a large clumsy item to carry around, im trying to keep my whole DSLR kit thingy small & compact.

Thanks for the pics!!

Nick :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
papucla10
Senior Member
Avatar
392 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Sep 13, 2006 10:49 |  #7

I am thinking in getting this lens too but after I buy the sigma 17-70mm


Canon 50D & 20D - Kodak M1033, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Canon 28-105 f/3.5-5.6, 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandro9mm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,718 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Italy, Milan
     
Sep 13, 2006 11:16 |  #8

impressive!


Photography Tips (external link) - Learn photography now!
Famous photographers (external link) - Video Interviews, photos, biography
My gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BoldBelvoir
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Sep 13, 2006 12:21 as a reply to  @ sandro9mm's post |  #9

I bought this lens about a month ago for £74 from:
http://www.waltersphot​ovideo.co.uk/ (external link)

It's now gone up to £90, but still good value. Not the fastest AF, but very good VFM

Phil.


Phil
---------------
Canon EOS 350D; Canon EFS 18-55;
Tamron LD DiII 55-200; Sigma EX DC HSM 10-20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandro9mm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,718 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Italy, Milan
     
Sep 13, 2006 14:54 |  #10

red hot sheep :)

what about its performance wide open? at 55? I maybe getting rid of 17-85 :S I don;t need it that wide anyways, and I'm not happy with sharpness :(


Photography Tips (external link) - Learn photography now!
Famous photographers (external link) - Video Interviews, photos, biography
My gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick_C
Goldmember
Avatar
4,042 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK)
     
Sep 13, 2006 15:03 |  #11

http://www.bristolcame​ras.co.uk/page192.htm (external link)

They do them pretty cheap, £79 I think I saw.

Nick :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bufferbure1
Senior Member
Avatar
458 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Canada
     
Sep 13, 2006 15:16 as a reply to  @ sandro9mm's post |  #12

sandro9mm wrote:
red hot sheep :)

what about its performance wide open? at 55? I maybe getting rid of 17-85 :S I don;t need it that wide anyways, and I'm not happy with sharpness :(

A little off topic, but I find the opposite. 17-85 is pretty sharp long and wide open, here is a 100% crop hand-held sample with 30D Standard Picture Style:
http://static.flickr.c​om/92/228898394_7756ee​7add_o.jpg (external link)


"I collect pictures, not gears..."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lenscode:1635.1785.50f​18.100Macro.70200F4IS.​580EX.30D.5D2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandro9mm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,718 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Italy, Milan
     
Sep 13, 2006 15:40 |  #13

bufferbure1
mm, I have to agree... well I'll see how it works on 30D, its still on its way :D on XT it didn't impress me at all!


Photography Tips (external link) - Learn photography now!
Famous photographers (external link) - Video Interviews, photos, biography
My gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ hot ­ sheep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,576 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London
     
Sep 20, 2006 12:51 as a reply to  @ sandro9mm's post |  #14

Sorry Sandro, I didn't realise anyone had replied to this!

Wide open at 55mm? Well, for its price, its very impressive. I haven't got a 1785 IS so I can't compare. You shouldn't expect miracles, but again, very good for its price. Bare in mind the picture of the person above and crop was wide open! :)

PM me your email address, and I'll send you a file size test shot. I was very surprised with its sharpness.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,006 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Tamron 55-200mm Mini Review with samples
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2861 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.