Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 28 Jul 2006 (Friday) 08:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Cleaning the sensor...

 
jacobsen1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,629 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Mt View, RI
     
Jul 28, 2006 08:55 |  #1

Well, I think I need to "go big or go home" and figure out how to really clean my sensor. I have a rocket air and it works quite well for all th ebig nasty gremlins, but whenever I stop WAY down (f/32) to get a long exposure I get thousands of little tiny spots all over my images. Beyond the rocket air, what's the next step to cleaning a sensor?

I've been reading about the copperhill meathod, is that the best way?
http://www.pbase.com/c​opperhill/ccd_cleaning (external link)
Looks like I need to get the sensor swipe though. I have the pec pads and eclipse solutuion, just not the swipe. Also is the sensor sweep worth getting? Looks like it works like a "magnet" and it a dry solution instead of the "wet" meathod found in the swipe with pads and eclipse?

Can anyone recomend this or something better? The rocket air just can't cut it anymore.

Thanks,
Ben


My Gear List

my sites:
benjacobsenphoto.com (external link) | newschoolofphotography​.com (external link)
GND buyers FAQ

FOR SALE: 5Dii RRS L-bracket, 430II, 12mm macro tube PM ME!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ hot ­ sheep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,576 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London
     
Jul 28, 2006 09:01 |  #2

I was worried about using the copperhill method, but after following the instructions carefully, it is really quite easy to do, and the results are very good. I reccommend it.


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jul 28, 2006 09:03 |  #3

jacobsen1 wrote:
Well, I think I need to "go big or go home" and figure out how to really clean my sensor. I have a rocket air and it works quite well for all th ebig nasty gremlins, but whenever I stop WAY down (f/32) to get a long exposure I get thousands of little tiny spots all over my images. Beyond the rocket air, what's the next step to cleaning a sensor?

I've been reading about the copperhill meathod, is that the best way?
http://www.pbase.com/c​opperhill/ccd_cleaning (external link)
Looks like I need to get the sensor swipe though. I have the pec pads and eclipse solutuion, just not the swipe. Also is the sensor sweep worth getting? Looks like it works like a "magnet" and it a dry solution instead of the "wet" meathod found in the swipe with pads and eclipse?

Can anyone recomend this or something better? The rocket air just can't cut it anymore.

Thanks,
Ben

I'm looking at getting the 'Visible Dust ' bundle
at £200 it aint cheap :evil: but it should last:cool:

Seems to be the best on the market AFAIK but am open to others opinions and experiences;)


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benandbobbi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,554 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas USA
     
Jul 28, 2006 09:30 |  #4

IMHO. there is NO better method of getting ALL the dust than the Copper Hill method. If you are mechanically inclined at all, you can clean your sensor 500 times for what the canon repair facility charges for one cleaning.


My Gear
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jul 28, 2006 10:23 |  #5

Another vote for the Copper Hill method. Good results and relatively inexpensive.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Coco-Puffs
Goldmember
Avatar
1,472 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
     
Jul 28, 2006 10:27 |  #6

Canon sells sensor cleaning kits acutally.
I dont know if htey do outside of Japan though.


--------------------

"Hi super nintendo Chalmers!" -Ralph Wiggum

--------------------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jul 28, 2006 10:31 as a reply to  @ Benandbobbi's post |  #7

Benandbobbi wrote:
IMHO. there is NO better method of getting ALL the dust than the Copper Hill method. If you are mechanically inclined at all, you can clean your sensor 500 times for what the canon repair facility charges for one cleaning.

I presume then that you have tried the Visible Dust system?

What didn't you like about it?, I was looking at which to get myself

thanks


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benandbobbi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,554 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas USA
     
Jul 28, 2006 10:38 |  #8

I have not personally tried the VDS, but I have read many reviews (pros and cons). Essentially they are the same thing, just use different swabs and fluids (assuming you go with the wet sensor method). I like the CH method due to the value and I like to use Eclipse to clean with.


My Gear
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mfunnell
Senior Member
Avatar
375 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 28, 2006 10:46 as a reply to  @ I Simonius's post |  #9

Simon King wrote:
I presume then that you have tried the Visible Dust system?

What didn't you like about it?, I was looking at which to get myself

thanks

I dropped a bundle on a bunch of Visible Dust stuff. The only thing I don't like about it is that I've never used it. The blower has worked fine so far. That's a good thing, right?

But I'm ready (I guess) if I need something more. The Visible Dust stuff looks really good. And it does a treat using their non-sensor cleaning gear to get cr*p off the mirror and focus screen. I expect their sensor cleaning stuff would do an equally good job.

...Mike


Some digital cameras, some film cameras, some lenses & other kit.
Day-to-day photos on flickr (external link), some older stuff at dA (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jul 28, 2006 11:30 as a reply to  @ Benandbobbi's post |  #10

Benandbobbi wrote:
I have not personally tried the VDS, but I have read many reviews (pros and cons). Essentially they are the same thing, just use different swabs and fluids (assuming you go with the wet sensor method). I like the CH method due to the value and I like to use Eclipse to clean with.

Can you please direct me to any reviews that are show the cons for the VDS?

Are they the same thing? The VDS claim to have patented the idea of 'charging the bristles to lift the dust - kinbds makes sense to me, but I need to do more research before dropping my wad on it

Cetainly the CH method looks cheaper and that has to be good right?;)


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jul 28, 2006 11:33 as a reply to  @ mfunnell's post |  #11

mfunnell wrote:
I dropped a bundle on a bunch of Visible Dust stuff. The only thing I don't like about it is that I've never used it. The blower has worked fine so far. That's a good thing, right?

But I'm ready (I guess) if I need something more. The Visible Dust stuff looks really good. And it does a treat using their non-sensor cleaning gear to get cr*p off the mirror and focus screen. I expect their sensor cleaning stuff would do an equally good job.

...Mike

Certianly with the 20D and 30D all I ever needed was a blower, but that sure aint enough with the 5D! I was thinking of taking it to the car wash it's so dusty, but as it's not weather proofed maybe I shouldn't risk it!:lol:

You have all you will ever need I guess for when you DO need it:D


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
Jul 28, 2006 11:39 as a reply to  @ Mark_Cohran's post |  #12

mcohran wrote:
Another vote for the Copper Hill method. Good results and relatively inexpensive.

Mark

agreed _ works great for me. Just follow the instructions.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benandbobbi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,554 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas USA
     
Jul 28, 2006 12:28 as a reply to  @ I Simonius's post |  #13

Simon King wrote:
Can you please direct me to any reviews that are show the cons for the VDS?

I'll direct you to a couple, but have you ever heard of Google? ;)

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/​visible-dust.shtml (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …ve/index.php/t-67758.html (Read the last post)


My Gear
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
I ­ Simonius
Weather Sealed Photographer
Avatar
6,508 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 49
Joined Feb 2005
Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes
     
Jul 28, 2006 14:34 as a reply to  @ Benandbobbi's post |  #14

Benandbobbi wrote:
I'll direct you to a couple, but have you ever heard of Google? ;)

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/​visible-dust.shtml (external link)
https://photography-on-the.net …ve/index.php/t-67758.html (Read the last post)

Yes my dear fellow, but the only reviews I have seen have been positive ones, I have not been able to find any unpositive ones:rolleyes:

THe ONLY mark against the VDS is the price, even on the links you have added

When you previously menbtioned that there were unfavourable reviews

I have not personally tried the VDS, but I have read many reviews (pros and cons).

I was interested to look in case they meant the product itself was not up to scratch ( opps shouldn't mention scrathes!:D )


Veni, Vidi, Snappi
Website  (external link) My Gear ---- (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benandbobbi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,554 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas USA
     
Jul 28, 2006 16:15 as a reply to  @ I Simonius's post |  #15

Simon King wrote:
Yes my dear fellow, but the only reviews I have seen have been positive ones, I have not been able to find any unpositive ones:rolleyes:

THe ONLY mark against the VDS is the price, even on the links you have added

When you previously menbtioned that there were unfavourable reviews I was interested to look in case they meant the product itself was not up to scratch ( opps shouldn't mention scrathes!:D )

OK Simon, do you work for VD? -- No pun intended. I never said there were unfavorable reviews. You read that into my statement. When I said I had read reviews (pros and cons), the "pros and cons" part was meant to define my use of the word "review". That said, I couldn't give less of a damn what sensor cleaning system you use.


My Gear
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,921 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Cleaning the sensor...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1650 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.