Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 28 Jul 2006 (Friday) 11:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post the most ridiculous comments you've received with a big lens on!

 
this thread is locked
Sam_M
Senior Member
Avatar
535 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: New England
     
Jan 11, 2008 19:09 |  #3241

tim wrote in post #4683966 (external link)
Why?

Roy Mathers wrote in post #4684052 (external link)
Yes, why?

Hmm, that did seem a bit rude didn't it. Let me try to explain. I thought it was funny that he was in green box mode because he kept shooting at the dark water, which was reflecting sunlight which made about all of his shots to be way under exposed. He'd take a shot, look at it on the LCD grumble under his breath (all I heard were angry mumbles) and snap a few more pictures. He did this for about 3 minutes, and finally left. I thought it was funny, because if he had tried another mode on the camera, like aperture priority or shutter priority, he might have had better luck. I think in the future, I'll have a bit more explaining to do to make myself look like less of a jerk.:) I was about 15 feet away from him the whole time, as I was on the dock next to the boat launch.


Canon 50D | Nikon D850 D200
+ other assorted glass, plastic, and metal.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 11, 2008 19:33 |  #3242

You didn't want to help him out?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sam_M
Senior Member
Avatar
535 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: New England
     
Jan 11, 2008 22:24 |  #3243

tim wrote in post #4684404 (external link)
You didn't want to help him out?

In retrospect I should have, though he really didn't seem in any mood for instruction. To be frank though, at that time, I wasn't confident enough in my abilities to provide instruction to people, let alone someone I've never met.


Canon 50D | Nikon D850 D200
+ other assorted glass, plastic, and metal.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkuenning
Goldmember
Avatar
1,507 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Claremont (near LA), California
     
Jan 12, 2008 19:44 |  #3244

I went to the local air show today (so close to home that you can see the aerobatics from our yard) and was impressed by the number of people with good setups. There was a pro there with a lens so long it had to be the 600--and he appeared to be shooting it handheld! (He was far away on the tarmac where peons couldn't go, so I couldn't be sure. But when he set the lens on the ground it came nearly to his waist.)

The funniest comment I got was "Is that an L?" referring to my very inexpensive Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6. It has a red ring, which is what confused the guy. Turns out he has a 70-200 f/2.8L that he'd left at home, so we had a nice chat.

But I think my favorite story wasn't a comment at all, but just an observation. There was a Nikon shooter next to me for a while. He had the top-end Nikon flash mounted, with the high-voltage belt battery pack attached. The flash and lens both had pieces of paper taped on with his name and phone number, I guess in case he lost them. Whatever. But here he was shooting the aerobatic show, with a plane that never got closer than 1000 feet, and that flash was going off with every shot!

Maybe I shoulda told him about the Better Beamer...


Geoff
All I want is a 10-2000 f/0.5L with no distortion that weighs 100 grams, fits in my pocket, and costs $300. Is that too much to ask?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikkoftime
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sothern California
     
Jan 12, 2008 22:14 |  #3245

haha i always get, "man, that thing is bigger than you are!"

i've also gotten, "SOMEONE's spoiled!"




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoccerRef
Goldmember
Avatar
1,925 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Jan 14, 2008 07:29 as a reply to  @ nikkoftime's post |  #3246

the_incubus wrote in post #4677473 (external link)
heres a story that is not really a comment because of big lens story at all but i felt it should go here.

I was at my swim practice this evening and we had a serious workout. Throughout most of the set i was pretty much out of breath and quite possibly had lack of oxygen to the brain :p. Anyway, i was explaining to my coach that my triceps felt especially tight today. However, he had no idea what i was talking about. The reason? I accidently kept saying tripods instead of triceps. The conversation went something like this

me: hey *coachs name* for some reason my tripods are really tight today.

coach: uh yea so, what do you want me to do about it (he knows photography is my hobby).

me: *feeling strange because of his response* uh oh, i thought uh i should just let you know uh yea. Maybe give me some insight as to why they are so tense.

coach: i dont know anything about tripods, put some WD-40 on it or something. *laughs* are you really asking me this now? get back to swimming.

me: *starts cracking up* and then i explain.

I had the same type of thing happen to me a long time ago... Word confusion that is. I had spent three months in Mexico and when I came home, I kept forgetting english words. After spending three months speaking no english at all, it was kind of weird.

The funniest though was my first day home in an encounter with my mother. I told her I was going to the "biblioteca" and she just looked at me funny and asked, "where are you going?" We went through this about five times and I finally looked at her in total disbelief that she didn't know what I was saying, and I said, "You know, the big red brick building at the end of the street with all the books!" She laughed and said, "You mean The LIBRARY!?" and I just looked at her and said, "Isn't that what I've been saying, the BIBLIOTECA!" It was then that I realized what I had been doing.

We still laugh about that to this day, some 20 years later. I had my mother with me about a year ago and we passed a library, and she said, "Look it's a Bible Tech".

Anyway, Thanks Incubus, I needed a laugh this morning and your post gave me one.


SoccerRef - PergerPhotography.com (external link) - SUPPORT POTN HERE (external link)My Canon Gear - 7D, Gripped 40D, Gripped 20D, SD780IS, EFS 17-85 f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF 28-135 IS, 420EX
My Sigma Gear - 70-200 f2.8, 28-70mm f2.8 EX DG
Next in Line
- 5D, or Mark IIn

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pjtemplin
Senior Member
311 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jan 14, 2008 10:21 |  #3247
bannedPermanent ban

A "comment" heard yesterday: "Woof!"

With my 1D3 going in for AF repairs today and being in Houston for two weeks of grunt work, I felt a brief shooting break was in order, so I went to the nearby "Bark Park" for some fun. One dog (when not distracted by the tennis ball and the pool) was disturbed by the white 70-200 - if it was in view, he'd bark at me. If hidden, he was fine. Go figure. See Bark Park (external link) for samples...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

1D MkIII, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS, nifty fifty, 3xSpeedlite 580EX II, Rebel XTi w/ kit 18-55mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-S
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jan 14, 2008 17:07 |  #3248

rockabilly808 wrote in post #4665370 (external link)
this amused me just by how ridiculous it was. happened yesterday

guy: nice camera
me: thanks
guy: must have ben expensive
me: more than I like to think about it
guy: can I hold it
me: uh, no Id rather you didn't
the guy walked away al dejected

gymell wrote in post #4665395 (external link)
Some random stranger asked to hold your camera, which he just acknowledged as being expensive? What an idiot!

well here's the solution: when he asks to hold it, YOU say: sure - as long as i can hold all your credit cards while you do it!

71sbeetle wrote in post #4665412 (external link)
"Did you know you could erase the pictures from the card after you transfer them to your computer ? It's so cool, I didn't know it at first and now I have 11 cards at home !"

roffl! :lol:

jonnythan wrote in post #4665438 (external link)
I think it's silly and elitist to make fun of people asking about zoom by replying with meaningless numbers or numbers they can't understand. They're just asking a simple question that *does* have an answer.

this is true... i think most of what is said here is only intended to be an after the fact joke, not something that is actually said to the enquirer

tim wrote in post #4674685 (external link)
I got an email from a friend once "Those are good photos, you must have a great camera!". I replied "Thanks for your lovely email, you must have a great keyboard!".

HAHAHA love that one, brilliant
tho i find that ppl i have taken odd snaps for soon recognise the difference between one of my photos and one of their p&s shots - they cant explain why they like it better, but they do - and it often leads to a paid shoot

gkuenning wrote in post #4690387 (external link)
The funniest comment I got was "Is that an L?" referring to my very inexpensive Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6. It has a red ring, which is what confused the guy.

a sigma with a red ring? i thought they all had gold ones?

pjtemplin wrote in post #4700352 (external link)
A "comment" heard yesterday: "Woof!"...

haha thats funny - cool shot of the dog too




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonnythan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,003 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Upstate NY
     
Jan 14, 2008 17:15 |  #3249

somethingsimple wrote in post #4702825 (external link)
a sigma with a red ring? i thought they all had gold ones?

Some have red, like the 70-300mm APO.


T2i | 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS | 50mm f/1.8 II | 430ex
Flickr
 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aCiD99
Senior Member
Avatar
639 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Nov 2006
Location: LaSalle, Ontario, Canada
     
Jan 14, 2008 17:17 |  #3250

somethingsimple wrote in post #4702825 (external link)
a sigma with a red ring? i thought they all had gold ones?

http://www.ephotozine.​com/images/Sig70-300apolens.jpg (external link)

EX series gets the gold ring I believe. As both my DG EX lens' are gold ringed.


1DXII, 3x 1DX, 5DSR, 1DIII, 1DsII, 6D, 7D, 50D, 30D, Rebel XT; 12-24, 14/2.8 fisheye, 20/1.4, 17-40/4L, 24-70/2.8L, 18-50/2.8, 3x 70-200/2.8 IS, 24-105L, 24-70/2.8L, 50/1.8II, 28-135IS, 85/1.2L, 135/1.8, 200/1.8L, 120-300/2.8 OS, 300/2.8L
www.bradgoldring.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThomasOwenM
Senior Member
Avatar
959 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Jan 14, 2008 18:28 |  #3251

smittymike19 wrote in post #4674327 (external link)
um, anyone else think that most of these replies are rude? if someone asks you a question give them the answer. There is no need to be rude because someone doesnt know something. be thankful that they are interested in you. remember, you do not know everything, and if you ask someone a question you would want them to be respectful and give you a proper answer. i didnt realize that there was such snobbery to go along with buying a camera and learning how to use it.:confused:

I think it depends how you say it. You could be really snotty when you say "Rembrandt must have had great brushes" or you could say it in a goofy, playful, and teasing way. You could probably make the person laugh and see your point. It's all about delivery.


===============
1D Mark III, Canon 50L f/1.2, Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 lens, Canon 85 mm f/1.8, 430 EX flash, ST-E2 Transmitter, Quantaray QSX 9500 tripod, Manfrotto monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gymell
Goldmember
Avatar
3,783 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bloomington, MN
     
Jan 14, 2008 20:52 |  #3252

Sure a lot of the replies are rude. But so are a lot of the comments, like "pervert lens", or the infamous "what are you compensating for", etc. I don't think many people here would really be rude to someone asking an honest question, but it's fair game otherwise!


-Liz
My online gallery (external link) and Live Streaming Feeder Cam (external link)
Help native birds - discourage house sparrows! (external link)
Minnesota Master Naturalist (external link) - "Explore, Teach, Conserve"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PM720
Senior Member
323 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jan 14, 2008 23:04 |  #3253

gkuenning wrote in post #4690387 (external link)
I went to the local air show today (so close to home that you can see the aerobatics from our yard) and was impressed by the number of people with good setups. There was a pro there with a lens so long it had to be the 600--and he appeared to be shooting it handheld! (He was far away on the tarmac where peons couldn't go, so I couldn't be sure. But when he set the lens on the ground it came nearly to his waist.)

The funniest comment I got was "Is that an L?" referring to my very inexpensive Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6. It has a red ring, which is what confused the guy. Turns out he has a 70-200 f/2.8L that he'd left at home, so we had a nice chat.

But I think my favorite story wasn't a comment at all, but just an observation. There was a Nikon shooter next to me for a while. He had the top-end Nikon flash mounted, with the high-voltage belt battery pack attached. The flash and lens both had pieces of paper taped on with his name and phone number, I guess in case he lost them. Whatever. But here he was shooting the aerobatic show, with a plane that never got closer than 1000 feet, and that flash was going off with every shot!

Maybe I shoulda told him about the Better Beamer...

Cable? I was out there Sunday. I rented a 100-400 for the weekend and wanted to try it out. 1 guy asked if I worked for the newspaper and a couple of others asked how long the lens was. Stretched out to 400mm it is kinda impressive. Wish I knew how to get on the OTHER side of the rope. :(

Bad news is I liked it so much I went out and bought one tonight! :lol:

Scott


1DsMkII, 1DMkIIn, XTi, Kit 18-55, 16-35L, 70-200L 2.8IS, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 100 2.8, 500/4, Sigma 10-20, Extender 1.4 & 2.0, 580EX's.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
datadump
Goldmember
Avatar
1,932 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Jan 14, 2008 23:48 |  #3254

"what are your trying to compensate for?"

this is what my bro inlaw tells me everytime i bring out my 70-200mm


datadump

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WMS
"Escargot on the Hoof"
Avatar
2,887 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jan 15, 2008 00:56 |  #3255

datadump wrote in post #4705356 (external link)
"what are your trying to compensate for?"

this is what my bro inlaw tells me everytime i bring out my 70-200mm

Considering that a 70-200 is a telephoto lens you are obviously compensating for distance.

Wayne


I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two.
Gear list: more toys than I need, Fewer than I want.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,926,026 views & 0 likes for this thread, 1885 members have posted to it and it is followed by 21 members.
Post the most ridiculous comments you've received with a big lens on!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1855 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.