Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 28 Jul 2006 (Friday) 11:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post the most ridiculous comments you've received with a big lens on!

 
this thread is locked
PiRho
Long live the TF!
Avatar
4,538 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: 1Hr from DuckTown
     
Jan 15, 2008 05:16 |  #3256

ThomasOwenM wrote in post #4703322 (external link)
I think it depends how you say it. You could be really snotty when you say "Rembrandt must have had great brushes" or you could say it in a goofy, playful, and teasing way. You could probably make the person laugh and see your point. It's all about delivery.

I Definitely Agree! body language is like 90% or something of the message, and in the case of the deaf, it is 100%. so I have to say that even if someone on here is offended at what was said, they are assuming that the comment was stated in the most derogatory way, and this is not a very good assumption.

Whenever anyone has made any comment and had any true interest in the camera, I am willing to just about talk their ears off... however if someone just wants to try and make themselves feel superior by berating someone else for their choices on hobbies or Quality(of said hobby) then I would rather not give them the time of day.

anyway. thats my thoughts on it.
Keep the comments coming, there are lots of comments on here that I have not gotten! and I have had many great laughs. (Note: my laughing at these comments is not entirely about their level of knowledge, it is remembering back when I was clueless about some of these things... zoom, expense... etc.)

Cheers,
~Z


~Z
| KH-20 | ...| XKCD (external link) | OOTS (external link) | CAD (external link) | WTD (external link) |
"Photography is no more about cameras, then mathematics is about calculators" ~ Z

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoccerRef
Goldmember
Avatar
1,925 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Jan 15, 2008 08:01 |  #3257

NOTE: All of the following occurred in less than a minute...

I was at a choir concert this past weekend when a gentleman walked up behind and whispered, "Nice Camera, are you a photographer?" Of course he said this while I was shooting, and while the choir was performing. He had startled the heck out of me, as he approached from the right and behind, so I had NO clue he was coming. To his credit, I was at the back of the church, and he was VERY quiet so he only disrupted one person other than me.

I turned to him, admittedly a little annoyed, and before I could say a word, he said sheepishly and somewhat embarrassed, "My camera battery just died. What are your settings?" At that I must have had a rather odd look on my face because he held up his camera (an old Canon AE-1 Film camera) and said, "My battery tells me what my settings should be, and I set it. I just need to know what the settings should be."

Finally realizing what he was asking, I quietly asked, "What is the speed of the film you are shooting?" "400" was his reply. I glanced at him rather shocked because I was shooting at 800 using a 2.8 aperture, a full stop of Compensation and I was only getting shutter speeds around 1/150. (Frankly right on the edge of acceptable hand holding speed for me).

I set to 400, asked him what his aperture was, and he looked at me like a deer caught in headlights. "I'm not sure", was his reply as he held up the camera for me to inspect. I looked at the front of the lens, where I saw 4.0 - 5.6(?). I told him, "You are going to have to set your lens as wide as you can, NOT zoom in and you are still going to be lucky to get anything other than a blurry mess, but I'll set it if you want me to."

He wanted me to and handed me his camera. At 400, set wide with a 4.0 aperture, shutter speed was down to like 1/20. (I don't remember the speed that I set him at exactly, but it was ridiculously slow.) I told him, "I'm not being rude, but you are not going to get clear photos with those settings, your shots are going to be VERY blurry."

"That's OK... I just NEED to take some pictures. Thanks bud." and he walked away. He seemed a little annoyed as well, not with me, just annoyed and embarrassed.

So, I watched him for few minutes. The very first thing he did was zoom in (changing his aperture to 5.6 if he zoomed in all the way which I am sure he did). I listened as he shot. CLACK...............cl​ick. I almost wish I could see those pictures, but I understood why he didn't really care, when I saw his wife (I assume that's who she was) nagging him about the shots... "Did you get her? Did you get her?" "Yeah, Yeah, I got her".

After the concert a guy who was sitting near them came up to me and told me she had nagged at him for 10 minutes to take pictures. He tried to explain that they wouldn't come out. He apparently told her, "this film is for outdoors" and her reply was "Film is Film, now take pictures". He apparently resisted until she insisted, "OK if you don't know how to do it, Go ask the REAL photographer over there".

I am so glad that gentleman who was sitting nearby shared (as Paul Harvey says) "The REST of the story". I almost feel sorry for the guy!


SoccerRef - PergerPhotography.com (external link) - SUPPORT POTN HERE (external link)My Canon Gear - 7D, Gripped 40D, Gripped 20D, SD780IS, EFS 17-85 f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF 28-135 IS, 420EX
My Sigma Gear - 70-200 f2.8, 28-70mm f2.8 EX DG
Next in Line
- 5D, or Mark IIn

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kennymc
Goldmember
Avatar
1,501 posts
Joined May 2003
Location: N.E coast of UK
     
Jan 15, 2008 08:17 as a reply to  @ SoccerRef's post |  #3258

Saturday just got me two bog standard comments...
That's a big one, and I bet you can see Mars through that thing...
1D MkIII with 300 f/2.8...


www.kennymc.com (external link)
Equipment http://kennymc.com/Inf​ormation/equipment.htm​l (external link)
http://www.kennymc.com​/equipment.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkoutdoor
Goldmember
Avatar
1,874 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Feeding my camera somewhere in Western Washington
     
Jan 15, 2008 08:19 |  #3259

SoccerRef wrote in post #4706886 (external link)
NOTE: All of the following occurred in less than a minute...

I was at a choir concert this past weekend when a gentleman walked up behind and whispered, "Nice Camera, are you a photographer?" Of course he said this while I was shooting, and while the choir was performing. He had startled the heck out of me, as he approached from the right and behind, so I had NO clue he was coming. To his credit, I was at the back of the church, and he was VERY quiet so he only disrupted one person other than me.

I turned to him, admittedly a little annoyed, and before I could say a word, he said sheepishly and somewhat embarrassed, "My camera battery just died. What are your settings?" At that I must have had a rather odd look on my face because he held up his camera (an old Canon AE-1 Film camera) and said, "My battery tells me what my settings should be, and I set it. I just need to know what the settings should be."

Finally realizing what he was asking, I quietly asked, "What is the speed of the film you are shooting?" "400" was his reply. I glanced at him rather shocked because I was shooting at 800 using a 2.8 aperture, a full stop of Compensation and I was only getting shutter speeds around 1/150. (Frankly right on the edge of acceptable hand holding speed for me).

I set to 400, asked him what his aperture was, and he looked at me like a deer caught in headlights. "I'm not sure", was his reply as he held up the camera for me to inspect. I looked at the front of the lens, where I saw 4.0 - 5.6(?). I told him, "You are going to have to set your lens as wide as you can, NOT zoom in and you are still going to be lucky to get anything other than a blurry mess, but I'll set it if you want me to."

He wanted me to and handed me his camera. At 400, set wide with a 4.0 aperture, shutter speed was down to like 1/20. (I don't remember the speed that I set him at exactly, but it was ridiculously slow.) I told him, "I'm not being rude, but you are not going to get clear photos with those settings, your shots are going to be VERY blurry."

"That's OK... I just NEED to take some pictures. Thanks bud." and he walked away. He seemed a little annoyed as well, not with me, just annoyed and embarrassed.

So, I watched him for few minutes. The very first thing he did was zoom in (changing his aperture to 5.6 if he zoomed in all the way which I am sure he did). I listened as he shot. CLACK...............cl​ick. I almost wish I could see those pictures, but I understood why he didn't really care, when I saw his wife (I assume that's who she was) nagging him about the shots... "Did you get her? Did you get her?" "Yeah, Yeah, I got her".

After the concert a guy who was sitting near them came up to me and told me she had nagged at him for 10 minutes to take pictures. He tried to explain that they wouldn't come out. He apparently told her, "this film is for outdoors" and her reply was "Film is Film, now take pictures". He apparently resisted until she insisted, "OK if you don't know how to do it, Go ask the REAL photographer over there".

I am so glad that gentleman who was sitting nearby shared (as Paul Harvey says) "The REST of the story". I almost feel sorry for the guy!

Fantastic... great "rest of the story". The guy made a good faith effort and of course he was right. Hubby "one", wife "zero". But it must be said... why not flash. Did you mention it to him?


Canon ~ 7D, 1D MkIIn, 5D, 20D, 10D, 100-400L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 17-40 f4L, 135mm f2L, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 50mm 2.5 macro, Ext. tubes, TC's 1.4 & 2.0, Feisol 3441-S CF Tpod, Gitzo Traveler Mpod, Acratech ballhead, 550EX, 200EG bag, Epson Pro 3800 printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
Avatar
3,365 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2005
Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
     
Jan 15, 2008 08:51 |  #3260

tkoutdoor wrote in post #4706962 (external link)
Fantastic... great "rest of the story". The guy made a good faith effort and of course he was right. Hubby "one", wife "zero". But it must be said... why not flash. Did you mention it to him?

He mentions a choir and being at the back of the church.

Chances are it was during a ceremony and flash was prohibited.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pakomo
Senior Member
Avatar
374 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
     
Jan 15, 2008 09:01 |  #3261

SoccerRef wrote in post #4706886 (external link)
NOTE: All of the following occurred in less than a minute...

I was at a choir concert this past weekend when a gentleman walked up behind and whispered, "Nice Camera, are you a photographer?" Of course he said this while I was shooting, and while the choir was performing. He had startled the heck out of me, as he approached from the right and behind, so I had NO clue he was coming. To his credit, I was at the back of the church, and he was VERY quiet so he only disrupted one person other than me.

I turned to him, admittedly a little annoyed, and before I could say a word, he said sheepishly and somewhat embarrassed, "My camera battery just died. What are your settings?" At that I must have had a rather odd look on my face because he held up his camera (an old Canon AE-1 Film camera) and said, "My battery tells me what my settings should be, and I set it. I just need to know what the settings should be."

Finally realizing what he was asking, I quietly asked, "What is the speed of the film you are shooting?" "400" was his reply. I glanced at him rather shocked because I was shooting at 800 using a 2.8 aperture, a full stop of Compensation and I was only getting shutter speeds around 1/150. (Frankly right on the edge of acceptable hand holding speed for me).

I set to 400, asked him what his aperture was, and he looked at me like a deer caught in headlights. "I'm not sure", was his reply as he held up the camera for me to inspect. I looked at the front of the lens, where I saw 4.0 - 5.6(?). I told him, "You are going to have to set your lens as wide as you can, NOT zoom in and you are still going to be lucky to get anything other than a blurry mess, but I'll set it if you want me to."

He wanted me to and handed me his camera. At 400, set wide with a 4.0 aperture, shutter speed was down to like 1/20. (I don't remember the speed that I set him at exactly, but it was ridiculously slow.) I told him, "I'm not being rude, but you are not going to get clear photos with those settings, your shots are going to be VERY blurry."

"That's OK... I just NEED to take some pictures. Thanks bud." and he walked away. He seemed a little annoyed as well, not with me, just annoyed and embarrassed.

So, I watched him for few minutes. The very first thing he did was zoom in (changing his aperture to 5.6 if he zoomed in all the way which I am sure he did). I listened as he shot. CLACK...............cl​ick. I almost wish I could see those pictures, but I understood why he didn't really care, when I saw his wife (I assume that's who she was) nagging him about the shots... "Did you get her? Did you get her?" "Yeah, Yeah, I got her".

After the concert a guy who was sitting near them came up to me and told me she had nagged at him for 10 minutes to take pictures. He tried to explain that they wouldn't come out. He apparently told her, "this film is for outdoors" and her reply was "Film is Film, now take pictures". He apparently resisted until she insisted, "OK if you don't know how to do it, Go ask the REAL photographer over there".

I am so glad that gentleman who was sitting nearby shared (as Paul Harvey says) "The REST of the story". I almost feel sorry for the guy!

That's almost gotta be the most sad story involving a camera. Good read, but poor mad.


Patrick Kofod Mogensen
Canon EOS 400D + BG-E3
16-35mm f/2.8L I,
85mm f/1.8, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | 430EX + Omni-Bounce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rockabilly808
Goldmember
Avatar
1,700 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Castine, Maine by way of Kanoehe, Hawaii
     
Jan 15, 2008 09:42 |  #3262

this was actually kinda cute. I was at the beach shooting and when i detached my 30D body from my 200-500 which i left on the tripod to throw on the 70-200 a kid probably 3 or 4 years old who had been watching me says to his mom "uh oh mommy, the man broke his camera" i thought it was cute.


Nathan
Nikon D80 Nikor 18-200VR yes I shoot with a nikon, get over it
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/playgroundearth​/ (external link)[/SIZE]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoccerRef
Goldmember
Avatar
1,925 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Jan 15, 2008 10:12 |  #3263

tkoutdoor wrote in post #4706962 (external link)
Fantastic... great "rest of the story". The guy made a good faith effort and of course he was right. Hubby "one", wife "zero". But it must be said... why not flash. Did you mention it to him?

mbellot wrote in post #4707090 (external link)
He mentions a choir and being at the back of the church.

Chances are it was during a ceremony and flash was prohibited.

Yep, Mbellot is right... It was a concert, but flash is prohibited at most concerts, and definitely was at this one.

I have to shoot another event at that same church next week, but next week's event is in the morning and the sun will be coming in the large windows. I am curious to see how much of a difference it makes!


SoccerRef - PergerPhotography.com (external link) - SUPPORT POTN HERE (external link)My Canon Gear - 7D, Gripped 40D, Gripped 20D, SD780IS, EFS 17-85 f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF 28-135 IS, 420EX
My Sigma Gear - 70-200 f2.8, 28-70mm f2.8 EX DG
Next in Line
- 5D, or Mark IIn

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ebann
Once an ugly duckling
Avatar
3,396 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Chimping around Brazil since 1973! (Sometimes NYC)
     
Jan 15, 2008 11:11 |  #3264

pakomo wrote in post #4707155 (external link)
That's almost gotta be the most sad story involving a camera. Good read, but poor mad.

But it has potential to become the happiest ending ever! The hubby now has a genuine reason to get approved some serious lenses! The likes of 16-35/2.8L, 70-200/2.8L IS, 24-70/2.8L, 135/2L, 35/1.4L, 85/1.2L... wives love to have pictures of their kids taken... just show one beautiful image and she'll approve in an instant! That's how I got my L-lenses approved!


Ellery Bann
Fuji X100
6D | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 50 1.4
1D Mk IV | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 135 2L | 400 5.6L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkoutdoor
Goldmember
Avatar
1,874 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Feeding my camera somewhere in Western Washington
     
Jan 15, 2008 11:32 |  #3265

ebann wrote in post #4707899 (external link)
But it has potential to become the happiest ending ever! The hubby now has a genuine reason to get approved some serious lenses! The likes of 16-35/2.8L, 70-200/2.8L IS, 24-70/2.8L, 135/2L, 35/1.4L, 85/1.2L... wives love to have pictures of their kids taken... just show one beautiful image and she'll approve in an instant! That's how I got my L-lenses approved!

In every cloud there's a silver lining. Hmmmm is the cloud the camera or the wife? :-)


Canon ~ 7D, 1D MkIIn, 5D, 20D, 10D, 100-400L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS, 24-105 f4L IS, 17-40 f4L, 135mm f2L, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 50mm 2.5 macro, Ext. tubes, TC's 1.4 & 2.0, Feisol 3441-S CF Tpod, Gitzo Traveler Mpod, Acratech ballhead, 550EX, 200EG bag, Epson Pro 3800 printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PiRho
Long live the TF!
Avatar
4,538 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: 1Hr from DuckTown
     
Jan 15, 2008 12:14 |  #3266

SoccerRef wrote in post #4706886 (external link)
NOTE: All of the following occurred in less than a minute...

...

I am so glad that gentleman who was sitting nearby shared (as Paul Harvey says) "The REST of the story". I almost feel sorry for the guy!

LOL this is definitely a ridiculous comment, I really feel for the guy! I hope that he can get some new equipment out of that experience.

~Z


~Z
| KH-20 | ...| XKCD (external link) | OOTS (external link) | CAD (external link) | WTD (external link) |
"Photography is no more about cameras, then mathematics is about calculators" ~ Z

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pjtemplin
Senior Member
311 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jan 15, 2008 14:25 |  #3267
bannedPermanent ban

But it has potential to become the happiest ending ever! The hubby now has a genuine reason to get approved some serious lenses! The likes of 16-35/2.8L, 70-200/2.8L IS, 24-70/2.8L, 135/2L, 35/1.4L, 85/1.2L... wives love to have pictures of their kids taken... just show one beautiful image and she'll approve in an instant! That's how I got my L-lenses approved!

Uh, no, he merely got approved to buy some 1600 speed film.


1D MkIII, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS, nifty fifty, 3xSpeedlite 580EX II, Rebel XTi w/ kit 18-55mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoccerRef
Goldmember
Avatar
1,925 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Jan 15, 2008 14:36 |  #3268

pjtemplin wrote in post #4709253 (external link)
Uh, no, he merely got approved to buy some 1600 speed film.

Oh, now WHAT are you doing??? Interjecting logic and reality into a fantasy!?

Come on, man, let us dream a little... We all KNOW it won't work quite that easily, but we can dream that it would!


SoccerRef - PergerPhotography.com (external link) - SUPPORT POTN HERE (external link)My Canon Gear - 7D, Gripped 40D, Gripped 20D, SD780IS, EFS 17-85 f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF 28-135 IS, 420EX
My Sigma Gear - 70-200 f2.8, 28-70mm f2.8 EX DG
Next in Line
- 5D, or Mark IIn

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aLFaDaRK
Senior Member
Avatar
751 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Jan 15, 2008 15:58 |  #3269

pjtemplin wrote in post #4709253 (external link)
Uh, no, he merely got approved to buy some 1600 speed film.

But that means tons of noise! (much more than digital 1600) So perhaps there's hope for new gear afterall?


Canon EOS 5D Mark III, Canon Speedlite 580EX II
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM, Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L USM, Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM
Apple 15" Retina Macbook Pro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zilly
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,086 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: uk
     
Jan 15, 2008 16:22 |  #3270

aLFaDaRK wrote in post #4709926 (external link)
But that means tons of noise! (much more than digital 1600) So perhaps there's hope for new gear afterall?

yeh but its good noise :p


Dom
Follow my adventures on twitter (external link)
Car Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,926,037 views & 0 likes for this thread, 1885 members have posted to it and it is followed by 21 members.
Post the most ridiculous comments you've received with a big lens on!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2585 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.