18-55 is not a big lens...your breaking the thread rules...lol
Michael_B Senior Member  817 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Dec 09, 2010 15:01 | #8896 18-55 is not a big lens...your breaking the thread rules...lol My Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
richardfox Goldmember  1,883 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Bellbrook, Ohio, USA More info | Dec 09, 2010 17:31 | #8897 Michael_B wrote in post #11424158  18-55 is not a big lens...your breaking the thread rules...lol I've also had people say "wow, that's a big lens" when I had my 18-55. Anything bigger than a point-and-shoot to most people is big. We Canonites (and Canonettes) KNOW better! Canon 50D gripped, EF 50/1.8, EF-S 10-22, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8L, 100/2.8 macro, 100-400L, 300 2.8L, Canon 500 f8 mirror with chipped EF mount, 580EX, 1.4x and 2x Canon teleconverters, Canon EF Life-Size converter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WMS "Escargot on the Hoof"  2,887 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2006 More info | Dec 09, 2010 22:09 | #8898 the observation that a 18-55 is a rather smallish lens is what makes the comment funny...... I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReubenH Senior Member  416 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Queenstown, New Zealand More info | Dec 10, 2010 04:25 | #8899 Yeah, Wayne got it "Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Dec 11, 2010 11:39 | #8900  Permanent banYou see, this post points out sarcastically that Wayne's a noob. That's why it's funny. The ":p" at the end just adds to the fun.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ErnieT Senior Member  717 posts Likes: 48 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Vancouver BC More info | Dec 12, 2010 16:34 | #8901 I'm sure we've all got this, but i was just shooting some pelican's and this guy says, "Wow, that's a big camera!" I said, "Actually its just a small camera with a big lens!" Canon 5D MKIII, Canon 7D MKII, Canon 16-35 F4L IS, Canon 70-200mm F2.8, Canon 100-400 MKII, Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mtnbkr1 Senior Member 257 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Los Angeles More info | Dec 12, 2010 16:39 | #8902 ^rofl your sig 5Dc | 85L | 1200 f5.6L | Lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ErnieT Senior Member 717 posts Likes: 48 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Vancouver BC More info | Dec 12, 2010 16:56 | #8903 mtnbkr1 wrote in post #11440094 ^rofl your sig LOL.. thanks someone noticed! Canon 5D MKIII, Canon 7D MKII, Canon 16-35 F4L IS, Canon 70-200mm F2.8, Canon 100-400 MKII, Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MPCman Senior Member 863 posts Likes: 30 Joined May 2008 Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands More info | Dec 12, 2010 23:55 | #8904 The 500 2.8 is missing 7D, EOS-M, 100-400 L, 15-85, Tokina 11-16 2.8, EF-M 11-22, 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KaMLuNg Member 41 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: NNJ/NYC More info | Dec 14, 2010 13:03 | #8905 richardfox wrote in post #11424905 I've also had people say "wow, that's a big lens" when I had my 18-55. Anything bigger than a point-and-shoot to most people is big. We Canonites (and Canonettes) KNOW better! WMS wrote in post #11426203 the observation that a 18-55 is a rather smallish lens is what makes the comment funny...... i was at my wife's best friend's wedding a few weeks ago in Oz... i didn't know anyone there, and after the ceremony, i went to the bar to get a drink before the reception opened... i had my xti with the 28-135mm lens on it... no biggie...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReubenH Senior Member 416 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Queenstown, New Zealand More info | Dec 14, 2010 15:57 | #8906 Rofl. Don't drink and shoot KaMLuNg! "Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Splatmaster527 Member  171 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Willoughby, OH More info | Dec 14, 2010 17:56 | #8907
_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imahawki Goldmember  1,455 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Omaha, NE More info | Dec 14, 2010 18:01 | #8908 Bwahahahah Olympus OMD E-M10 | Olympus 25 f/1.8 | Olympus 45 f/1.8 | Olympus 75 f/1.8 | Olympus 9-18 f/4-5.6 | Olympus 14-42 f/3.5-5.6 | Olympus 40-150 f/4-5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewHicksPhotography Goldmember  2,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | Dec 14, 2010 18:28 | #8909 Splatmaster527 wrote in post #11453083 maybe thats cuz the 500mm 2.8 doesnt exist... THATSTHEJOKE.JPG Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthyNinja Cream of the Crop 14,387 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Mythical Tasmania (the one with lots of tall buildings in the semi-tropics, A.K.A. Hong Kong) More info | Dec 14, 2010 20:00 | #8910 Permanent banSplatmaster527 wrote in post #11453083 maybe thats cuz the 500mm 2.8 doesnt exist...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1033 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
