Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 28 Jul 2006 (Friday) 11:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Post the most ridiculous comments you've received with a big lens on!

 
this thread is locked
FrostMonolith
Senior Member
Avatar
411 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Likes: 320
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Medan, Indonesia
     
Aug 28, 2012 10:00 |  #9751

Model shooting, changing from my 50 to my 70-300L...

"Give me that bottle! I know it's a big bottle!!!"

o.o


Still, the best comment comes from the closest.... My own girlfriend...

"How do you zoom with this?"
on my 35..

*wishes she doesn't read this*


Maybe the world can still look beautiful tomorrow...
T3i/600D | EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM | EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM | Full Weaponry | Old Blog (external link) | Gallery (Facebook) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonParadis
Member
Avatar
59 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Québec
     
Aug 28, 2012 18:24 |  #9752

5D3 with 70-200 2.8 L USM in my hands.
I see someone with a Bridge camera. I see him surprised by my "big lens", I tell him I'm sure his 16x camera has far more reach than mine, We quickly do a live view test at max reach, Me at 200mm and him at ..850mm.

He was surprised haha.. However his shot was blurry and most likely had digital zoom applied at such high zoom.


5D3 | 35 ƒ1.4 | 85 ƒ1.4 | 24-70 ƒ2.8L | 70-200 ƒ2.8L USM | Tokina 11-16 ƒ2.8
Official photographer of Paintball Mirabel, Qc.http://paintballmirabe​l.com/photos (external link)
Add me on Facebook:::http://www.facebook.co​m/simon.paradis (external link) .. www.simonparadis.ca (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Aug 29, 2012 11:04 |  #9753

MOkoFOko wrote in post #14883421 (external link)
Oh, that was you I met? 5d2 is worthless now. Deal with it :lol:

I'll give you $200 for it.

LOL. Errr, OK.

I like that reply/retort, I was not expecting that.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ron ­ Bailey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,127 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Aug 2007
Location: NW Oklahoma
     
Sep 02, 2012 19:33 |  #9754

drvnbysound wrote in post #13852743 (external link)
I just saw this video and it made me think of this thread... not exactly related to "big lens" but I think it fits

http://www.youtube.com …er_embedded&v=n​iyTIbiV19A (external link)!

Yep, I think I've heard most of these.

"No wonder your pictures look so good, look at that camera!"

"If I had a camera like that my pictures would look just like yours."

"Well yeah, if I had that many megapixels I would be making money too."

"Damn, and I thought my camera was big."

"Did you have to get that online?"


http://www.ronbaileyph​otography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Sep 04, 2012 21:15 |  #9755

Two Saturdays ago in Rocky Mountain National Park. Can't wait for the fall colors - that'll be Provia 100F time.

Ilford Delta 100 processed in Pyrocat HD.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8303/7926711872_2d2f653143_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/digi-film/7926711872/  (external link)
Old Fall River Road creek, Rocky Mountain National Park (external link)

"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NewEnglandPhotographer
Goldmember
2,343 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2011
     
Sep 04, 2012 21:20 |  #9756

uhhh, wrong thread?


Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 04, 2012 22:39 |  #9757

Tony-S wrote in post #14948798 (external link)
Two Saturdays ago in Rocky Mountain National Park. Can't wait for the fall colors - that'll be Provia 100F time.

Ilford Delta 100 processed in Pyrocat HD.

Someone actually said that to you? That is absolutely ridiculous!


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IShootThings
I thought I was special.......
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 26
Joined May 2009
Location: North Cali
     
Sep 04, 2012 22:54 |  #9758

This wasn't really because of the lens I had on but...

7d + 24-70L

It was 11:30pm and Disneyland had been closed since 11. They leave Main Street open for an hour after closing so people can shop. I had waited half an hour for most of the people to clear out before setting up my tripod to shoot the castle. I'm set up and adjusting my exposure when a couple probably in their 50's walks right toward me and passes in front of the camera. They get past me and the lady stops, turns around and goes "Oh, he looks like he knows what he's doing. That's a great picture!" and then proceeds to literally stick her P&S right over my shoulder to take a picture. I moved away a little bit and just looked at her with a "Are you serious?" look on my face...


Canon 5D3, Canon XTI (IR converted), 24-70 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L, 50 1.4, 70-200 f2.8L, 100 2.8 macro, 430 ex & 580 exII speedlights.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew ­ Tingle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Perth, WA
     
Sep 04, 2012 23:04 as a reply to  @ MOkoFOko's post |  #9759

I get comments all the time, indeed, using the 500 F4 seems to act as a people magnet which, by far in the main, I don't mind at all, though, has to be said, I've missed countless shots due to people coming to talk to me right when the bird I have been stalking for four hours plus actually decides he will play ball and do a fly past.

In the main, the most comments I get are about just how far I can see with the 500, as people think is has far, far more reach than it actually does.

On one side of a massive lake I get people pointing out tiny speaks of birds right over the other side, like absolutely tiny, whilst telling me that they reckon I could get a good eye shot of that one. Or, again, at a lake, they bet I can read the time on someone's wrist watch on the other side of the lake that's like 3km away.

I've had a few saying they bet I can see the moon with that remarks, which always make me smile.

Shooting airliners a while back from an airport observation area I got a family give me a seat number of their son and ask it I could get them a photo of him in he window as they think he would wave at them.

At the beach with a yacht moored way, way out to sea I got a couple ask if I was paparazzi and who was one the boat "is it Tom Cruise?".

In the end, if they are really proving interested, I tend to pass them the camera with the 500 bolted on so they can look through the viewfinder and they always look through and seem pretty damn disappointed with just how much reach it actually has (even when hooked up to a 1.4TC and on a 7D). They then change the subject away from its reach to how heavy the lens is.


MY WEBSITE: Andrew Tingle Photography (external link) / ATP Facebook Page (external link) / My 500px  (external link) / Connect with me on FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ P
Goldmember
Avatar
1,911 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 247
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 05, 2012 07:55 |  #9760

Andrew Tingle wrote in post #14949182 (external link)
Shooting airliners a while back from an airport observation area I got a family give me a seat number of their son and ask it I could get them a photo of him in he window as they think he would wave at them.

That's the funniest comment I've seen on this thread! Hilarious!


1Dx - 5DIII - 40D - Canon 24-70LII, 100L macro, 135L, 16-35L, 70-200 f4 and 100-400L lenses

- "Very good" is the enemy of "great." Sometimes we confuse the two.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
advaitin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,624 posts
Gallery: 434 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 877
Joined Jun 2003
Location: The Fun Coast of Florida
     
Sep 05, 2012 08:39 |  #9761

Tony-S wrote in post #14948798 (external link)
Two Saturdays ago in Rocky Mountain National Park. Can't wait for the fall colors - that'll be Provia 100F time.

Ilford Delta 100 processed in Pyrocat HD.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/digi-film/7926711872/  (external link)
Old Fall River Road creek, Rocky Mountain National Park (external link)

I'm an idiot. I just tried to find the EXIF data. Very nicely done photo, shows that film is far from dead and still outperforms digital in many ways. Still wrong thread.


Canons to the left, Canons to the right,
We hold our L glass toward the light,
Digitizing in a snap reflective glory
That will forever tell our imaged story.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisa
Goldmember
1,183 posts
Gallery: 188 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2276
Joined May 2005
Location: Effingham, IL
     
Sep 05, 2012 08:48 |  #9762

With my Canon 300 f/4 on my 50D
" what X zoom is that"




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Sep 06, 2012 07:40 |  #9763

Andrew Tingle wrote in post #14949182 (external link)
I get comments all the time, indeed, using the 500 F4 seems to act as a people magnet which, by far in the main, I don't mind at all, though, has to be said, I've missed countless shots due to people coming to talk to me right when the bird I have been stalking for four hours plus actually decides he will play ball and do a fly past.

In the main, the most comments I get are about just how far I can see with the 500, as people think is has far, far more reach than it actually does.

On one side of a massive lake I get people pointing out tiny speaks of birds right over the other side, like absolutely tiny, whilst telling me that they reckon I could get a good eye shot of that one. Or, again, at a lake, they bet I can read the time on someone's wrist watch on the other side of the lake that's like 3km away.

I've had a few saying they bet I can see the moon with that remarks, which always make me smile.

Shooting airliners a while back from an airport observation area I got a family give me a seat number of their son and ask it I could get them a photo of him in he window as they think he would wave at them.

At the beach with a yacht moored way, way out to sea I got a couple ask if I was paparazzi and who was one the boat "is it Tom Cruise?".

In the end, if they are really proving interested, I tend to pass them the camera with the 500 bolted on so they can look through the viewfinder and they always look through and seem pretty damn disappointed with just how much reach it actually has (even when hooked up to a 1.4TC and on a 7D). They then change the subject away from its reach to how heavy the lens is.

I normally reply that "I can see it pretty well without it as well"


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sarahwhite
Member
63 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Sep 07, 2012 01:43 |  #9764

Me with a 5dm2 and a 24-70mm.....

Stranger : '' I think you are a great photographer ! ''
Me : '' .... but you haven't seen the pictures ''
Stranger : '' Oh I can tell those things , your equipment is great ! ''

that made me more angry than anything hahahhaa


Photographer at Flanelle Magazine www.flanellemag.com (external link)
www.sarahwhitephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew ­ Tingle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,299 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Perth, WA
     
Sep 07, 2012 01:54 |  #9765

neilwood32 wrote in post #14954568 (external link)
I normally reply that "I can see it pretty well without it as well"

Ah, concerning the all too frequent "I bet you can see the moon with that" remarks I've had a thought. I'm going to get an image of the new Mars lander on Mars (NASA simulated shot) crop it, save it to the CF so next time i can call it up for those that say this and show them just how much reach I have at my disposal.

I suspect, once they realize what I've done, it'll raise a smile. And if it raises a smile, great, who could ask for more.


MY WEBSITE: Andrew Tingle Photography (external link) / ATP Facebook Page (external link) / My 500px  (external link) / Connect with me on FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,924,559 views & 0 likes for this thread, 1885 members have posted to it and it is followed by 21 members.
Post the most ridiculous comments you've received with a big lens on!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1835 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.