i just banged this image out and i am kinda thrilled about it... what do you guys think?
I have been seeing this KIND of method a lot in glam/fashion tography lately.. and i ma rather pleased with how closely i have emulated it here.
photog_87 Senior Member 767 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia More info | Jul 29, 2006 15:46 | #1 i just banged this image out and i am kinda thrilled about it... what do you guys think? commercial site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 29, 2006 15:57 | #2 ooh... and one more... commercial site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pieq314 Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | Jul 29, 2006 16:06 | #3 photog_87 wrote: i just banged this image out and i am kinda thrilled about it... what do you guys think? I have been seeing this KIND of method a lot in glam/fashion tography lately.. and i ma rather pleased with how closely i have emulated it here. It is cool! Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 29, 2006 20:10 | #4 i would like to see what you mean, but avoided that entirely as i felt that full impact eyes may have been TOO much... commercial site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
frate Member 38 posts Joined Apr 2002 More info | Jul 29, 2006 20:25 | #5 That's an interesting look. It makes me think of charcoal or pastel on board, like old-time galmor ads. Playing with the highlights (even if that's not what you're going for here) would make it even more catching. IMHO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
enilm Member 188 posts Joined Dec 2004 More info | Jul 29, 2006 20:28 | #6 That's awesome. Mind sharing how you get these results? Canon 40D w/ kit lens 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6. No Flash, No lights, No other lenses. Just starting out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Livinthalife Cream of the Crop 5,118 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Austin,TX More info | Jul 29, 2006 20:33 | #7 I would also like to know your "secret" for these results. -Andy-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2006 10:39 | #8 I would love to share: commercial site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pieq314 Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Apr 2006 More info | photog_87 wrote: i would like to see what you mean, but avoided that entirely as i felt that full impact eyes may have been TOO much... I meant brighten up the eyes so that you see the white areas of the eyes. I do not know how much impact they will have, but you can create a layer so that you can adjust their brightness to what you like. Canon 1D Mk III/5D2, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX, Canon 85/1.8, Canon 100/2.8 IS macro, Canon 135/2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Canon 500 f/4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2006 14:56 | #10 i know exactly HOW to do it, but i disagree that it would help... feel free to give it a go and prove me wrong though... commercial site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Livinthalife Cream of the Crop 5,118 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Austin,TX More info | Jul 30, 2006 19:41 | #11 Thanks for sharing a detailed idea of how to work out this idea. I'll have to give it a go sometime! TX again! -Andy-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jul 30, 2006 19:51 | #12 I like the first one, but I think you need to take a look at her right cheek (just left/below the nose for the viewer). Looks like you cloned a bit too sloppy there. It looks like a bruise now... On the second one, the focus is not where I'ld want it, and you also lost some detail cloning. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 30, 2006 21:17 | #13 yeah i saw that bruise too... but i let it slide... i was just so thrilled about the overall result that i just said "to heck with it!" commercial site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Livinthalife Cream of the Crop 5,118 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Austin,TX More info | Jul 30, 2006 21:28 | #14 I think the "lost" detail is jpeg compression..just appears a bit blocky on the right -Andy-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Jul 30, 2006 22:01 | #15 I think the second pic (looking down) is a little too dark for my taste, but the first one I like - a lot. very nice technique. I like the vignetting and the way the picture gradates out at the bottom. the sort of "graying" of colors adds deep moods to the picture. very nice. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2883 guests, 177 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||