Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 04 Aug 2006 (Friday) 00:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

800 iso or 1600 iso

 
Ralph ­ Merlino
Goldmember
1,645 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 03, 2008 23:15 as a reply to  @ post 5654793 |  #16

I use f2.8 at iso800 all the time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 04, 2008 00:07 |  #17

Ralph Merlino wrote in post #5655211 (external link)
I use f2.8 at iso800 all the time.

Outside when it's sunny?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 04, 2008 11:12 |  #18

people far away,

I doubt you'd see much difference in DOF in that case. BUT your lens will be sharper at f/4.

It's a crapshoot, & I'd probably go for ISO 1600 for any print under 12X18".

Outside when it's sunny?

Gavin shoots everything at high ISO & provides fun captions as well. The first image is ISO Speed Ratings = 1600
The week's sporting events in images...


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 04, 2008 11:22 |  #19

Shoot both ans use whichever is best. Also, if you expose to the right a bit you can bring the exposure back to normal in post processing and the noise almost goes away.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Jun 04, 2008 11:26 |  #20

I'd go as high as possible. I like to expose heavily for ambient. Shooting wide open and a high aperture gives me that. Head over to the nightclub photography topics and you will see there are so many different ways of doing it.

Higher the ISO, the more ambient you can capture as rely less on keeping that shutter speed up or having a super fast lens.

ISO 1600 with 24-105 @ f/4

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Some of the nightclub photographers work by using a fast lens, low ISO and slow shutter speeds. It just depends on what you are going for.

Have you got a sample photo possibly?

Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
E-K
Senior Member
983 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Canada
     
Jun 04, 2008 11:38 |  #21

PhotosGuy wrote in post #5658032 (external link)
Gavin shoots everything at high ISO & provides fun captions as well. The first image is ISO Speed Ratings = 1600
The week's sporting events in images...

To be fair though, that image is about EV 10 1/3 - so open shade. If I shot in bright sunlight at f/2.8 and ISO800, I would require a shutter speed of 1/30000 of a second - unfortunately my camera doesn't go that high :(. I suppose I could put an ND filter on, but adjusting the ISO on a digital camera seems a little more convenient ;).

e-k




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,551 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
800 iso or 1600 iso
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2679 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.