RenéDamkot THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop  39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | DrPablo wrote: I'd use high radius-low amount sharpening (like unsharp mask with amount 20 and radius 20-50) to sharpen big enlargements without getting too much artifact. Wouldn't that be just 'local contrast enhancement'? "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DrPablo Goldmember  1,568 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Aug 09, 2006 11:02 | #17 Yes and no. I mean all sharpening is local contrast enhancement when you think about it. Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeandroBento Member 143 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Bronx, NY More info | Aug 09, 2006 11:33 | #18 I didnt know DPP had a noise reduction feature. Where is it located? I have DPP like any Canon user, but never used any NR on my images because I didnt know it existed. How do I apply NR with DPP?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Aug 09, 2006 12:28 | #19 It's in the new DPP (2.1), under preferences. Which is rather silly... "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Aug 12, 2006 08:27 | #20 Update: Gave it a try and ran Noise Ninja over the full file. (upscaled) "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asylumxl Goldmember 2,306 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Stuck in an invisible box More info | René Damkot wrote: Update: Gave it a try and ran Noise Ninja over the full file. (upscaled) Results were quite good, but still some 'coarser' noise remained. The best results I got when running Noise Ninja over the original file, before upscaling. So, for maximum quality, I'ld have to photoshop the entire image again... I don't think I'll do that, since differences were not all that shocking (yet plainly visible). The file 'as is' is good enough for the intended purpose. Next time however, I think I'll purchase either Neat Image or Noise Ninja, and run that before doing anything else... buy noise ninja, you will not regret it ...............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
segal3 Member  126 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Calabasas, CA More info | Apr 06, 2007 15:46 | #22 René Damkot wrote in post #1812233  Here I met the first full stop: For some reason DPP won't go to 3 meters wide @ 100dpi. Maximum image size seems to be limited to 9999 x 6666 pixels. Strange thing is, that if I apply a crop, the image can be enlarged more. So it seems the maximum output is 9999 pixels wide. René - you say the picture had to be enlarged to 11,000px wide. Why can't you do two crops, converted in DPP at 5500px wide, of each half of the image, and then align them in Photoshop? Matt Segal - carbonos scuba
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Apr 07, 2007 04:57 | #23 Never thought about that, but I suppose that would have been an option "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 1594 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
!
