Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Aug 2006 (Monday) 12:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why use a head unit on a monopod?

 
KAS
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
     
Aug 14, 2006 12:57 |  #1

I have read on several occasions in this forum that people use a ball head on their monopod. My question is why? It's a stick. It can easily rotate on the ground. and I also don't see why, unless you had the monopod at an odd angle to the ground, why you'd even need a fully adjustable head. If it's being held at such an odd angle, just hand hold.

I have a monopod, and I have never found a use for a complex head unit yet.

Just my observation, and curiosity.

-Kirk


1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)

| Niagara Weddings & Portraits - Afterglow Images (external link)
| Niagara Weddings & Portraits - Afterglow Images Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil_Mart
Member
Avatar
91 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Tyne & Wear UK
     
Aug 14, 2006 13:15 |  #2

I have a Manfrotto mono pod and a head for it. Reasons being a, the head has a quick detachable mounting plate that I can leave on the camera, simply click on and off and b, have you ever tried going to portrait (vertical) mode with a mono pod ;)


Philip Martin
__________

350 D + Battery Grip
Kit EFS 18-55mm Lens, EF 50mm II, EFS 17 - 85mm IS USM, EF 75- 300 USM. 100 - 400mm IS USM L
Manfrotto 676B monopod & 234RC head. Lowepro Back-pack,
Wacom Graphire Classic XL (this is great!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KAS
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,102 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Niagara Region, Canada
     
Aug 14, 2006 13:33 |  #3

ah...portrait...never thought of that. duh. that was short-lived confusion.

I don't shoot a lot of portrait...which is perhaps why I didn't think of it.


Thanks
-Kirk


1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)

| Niagara Weddings & Portraits - Afterglow Images (external link)
| Niagara Weddings & Portraits - Afterglow Images Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cecilc
Senior Member
Avatar
613 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, Ga
     
Aug 14, 2006 14:02 as a reply to  @ KAS's post |  #4

I screw the monopod directly into the foot of the lens' tripod collar....

And, usually, any lens that's heavy enough to USE a monopod with (a few that come to mind: 70-200 2.8; 100-400 5.6; 300 2.8; 400 2.8; etc.) have their own tripod collar that rotates ... so it's easy to go from horizontal to portrait even attached directly to a monopod. And I go from landscape mode to portrait mode at the turn of lock ....

I've tried to use a ball-head on a monopod, but was totally unsuccesfull with it - no amount of tightening the ball head could prevent my 400 2.8 from dipping and wobbling all over the place ... I just never could keep it steady and level ...

So, for me, monopod only - no ball head .....


Cecil
Maxpreps Galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AccidentalArt
Senior Member
616 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Houston areas
     
Aug 14, 2006 14:13 as a reply to  @ cecilc's post |  #5

the quick release it worth it alone, but another benefit is the ability to sqaure the picture in the event the camera cannot be directly above the foot of the tripod. I would not have guessed it until I got mine, it made things way simpler.

AA


7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
Avatar
4,175 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Aug 14, 2006 14:25 as a reply to  @ cecilc's post |  #6

I have ball heads on both of my monopods. I wouldn't have it any other way.

When I am using it for motorsports I like that I can pan or adjust as the cars come at me without having to alter my stance. With a large lens, the tripod ring is essential to keep the whole rig in balance. Vertical (portrait) orientation is another reason.

The other interesting use of a monopod for me was shooting high school plays. I sat in a seat in the orchestra pit and ran the monopod from my chest down to the floor at an angle and secured the bottom with my feet. The ball head allowed me to have the camera at that odd angle. It worked quite well.

My 2 cents.

Have Fun,


Rick

My Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Aug 14, 2006 16:09 |  #7

I have considered getting a monopod... Maybe this Christmas!


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ clements
Goldmember
Avatar
1,644 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2004
Location: this scepter'd isle (bottom right corner)
     
Aug 15, 2006 13:47 |  #8

The monopod's foot should form the stationary third side of a tripod along with your 2 size 12 Nike's. So to avoid a shaky soft-shoe-shuffle you still need one plane of movement (up &down) on the monopod for anything that's not on the straight & level, such as aircraft or birds.
I use a Manfrotto head that just tilts up and down, rather than a full ball.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Aug 15, 2006 17:02 |  #9

I use my monopod in many ways, including while I am sitting and waiting for some sort of animal or bird to do whatever I am waiting for it to do. The monopod could be at a very strange angle, and a ball head (Bogen/Manfrotto 486RC2) on top makes this sort of thing not only possible but quite practical.

Since I may be using the monopod with the camera in any position, the ball head is much more versatile than the one-way tilt heads.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KennyG
Goldmember
Avatar
2,252 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
     
Aug 15, 2006 17:22 |  #10

It all depends on what you are doing with the setup. You never see pros using ballheads with monopods at sporting events when they have lenses with collars. You very quickly learn how to tilt as well as pan. With short lenses, even a 70-200 2.8IS, there isn't any need for a monopod unless you are in virtual darkness with a very slow shutter speed. Your own lens collection does not justify one, unless you do a lot of low-light work.


Ken
Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil_Mart
Member
Avatar
91 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Tyne & Wear UK
     
Aug 16, 2006 05:25 as a reply to  @ KennyG's post |  #11

Disagree with KennyG here. You, as a pro photographer may well be able to hold a 75 - 300 (zoomed out to 300mm) perfectly stable, but I'll bet there are a shed load of people here that cant :(


Philip Martin
__________

350 D + Battery Grip
Kit EFS 18-55mm Lens, EF 50mm II, EFS 17 - 85mm IS USM, EF 75- 300 USM. 100 - 400mm IS USM L
Manfrotto 676B monopod & 234RC head. Lowepro Back-pack,
Wacom Graphire Classic XL (this is great!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tandem
Goldmember
Avatar
1,244 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Colorado Springs
     
Aug 16, 2006 07:10 as a reply to  @ Phil_Mart's post |  #12

I find the ball head works great for lenses like the 70-200 f/2.8 IS that you can hand hold for a period of time but don't want to hold for long. After 4-5 hours it can make a BIG difference on how my back feels.


Bill - A model needs careful lighting, professional makeup and expensive clothes to look as beautiful as any ordinary woman does to a man who has fallen in love with her.
G10, 5D, 1D2n, 1D3, 1Ds3, 1.4x, 2x / 17-40 f4, 24-105 f4 IS, 70-200 f4, 300 f4 IS / 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS, 200 f2.8, 300 f2.8 IS, 400 f2.8 IS / 35 f1.4, 50 f1.2, 85 f1.2, 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8M 135 f2
http://ColoradoSprings​.SmugMug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thornfield
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
     
Aug 16, 2006 08:24 |  #13

Monopod with the lens mounted directly to it. For vertical shot's I leave the collar slightly loose. Shooting with a 70-200 2.8L non IS only so this might not apply if you don't have a lens collar.


Relationships are like photography, it has to click. :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IainB
Goldmember
Avatar
1,427 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand,
     
Aug 16, 2006 17:09 as a reply to  @ CoolToolGuy's post |  #14

CoolToolGuy wrote:
I have ball heads on both of my monopods. I wouldn't have it any other way.

Why not go for one more and you'll have a tripod.....;)


_______________
IainB
"Chi non ha moglie non ha padrone."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Aug 16, 2006 17:09 |  #15

I have a ball head on my most used monopod for practically all the reasons stated above. I do have a monopod without the head which is a bit lighter, but I really seldom use it.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,511 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Why use a head unit on a monopod?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2541 guests, 91 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.