Actually that was the 1st thing I thought I'd do, i.e. wait for the 40D. I actually think this is probably the best option, however I've been selling like mad on ebay recently and have the funds just sitting here...
| POLL: "To upgrade, or not to upgrade?" |
Stay with 350D, and upgrade later (when needed) | 266 82.9% |
Upgrade to the 400D :) ASAP | 55 17.1% |
burchy Member 241 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Manchester, UK More info | Actually that was the 1st thing I thought I'd do, i.e. wait for the 40D. I actually think this is probably the best option, however I've been selling like mad on ebay recently and have the funds just sitting here... Simon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
narlus Cream of the Crop 7,671 posts Likes: 85 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Andover, MA More info | basroil wrote: if only 400d had 5fps shooting, then i would consider the jump. at this rate, i'm stuck waiting 6 months-8 months for the replacement of the 20d (30d is not a replacement) just curious why you don't think the 30D wasn't the 20D's replacement...more of an update, no new ground breaking stuff? www.tinnitus-photography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hodad66 Member 141 posts Likes: 520 Joined Oct 2003 Location: Indialantic, Florida More info | grego wrote: Wow, for a 10D user, you will appreciate a 30D, from my experiences in photo journalism and sports. 10D's gone ... traded for the XT. FPS is nice but I rely upon Sony A7RIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thetolleyman Senior Member 611 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Williamsburg, VA More info | Aug 27, 2006 19:06 | #154 I say in the current market (which is quickly changing), $800 for a brand new 10mp Canon SLR, do it! I just want the extra pixels and the self cleaning feature. Bigger LCD will be nice too. 50D 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnnyV Goldmember 2,290 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Jersey Shore More info | Aug 27, 2006 19:27 | #155 Here's a mini review of the XTi/400: Fear the Gear! Canon 5D3/6D/50D/T2i/EOS-M; 17-40L f4; 70-200 f4; 50 f1.4; 18-55 f3.5 IS; Sigma 85 f1.4; Tamron 85 f1.8; Canon 35 f2-IS; 580EX; Comet Strobes; Smugmug 20% Discount
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SJK Member 51 posts Joined Sep 2005 More info | burchy wrote: The thing I can't work out is should I upgrade my 300D to the 400D or 30D? Messing with my head this one. Do you truly use all the functionality on the 300? If the answer is yes then go for the 30. If the answer is no then go for the 400 as it is just a better 300 and you still need to learn this level of camera. There is a lot to learn just to get all the functionality out of the 300-350-400.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scotttnz "tick, tick, tick, tick......" More info | Aug 28, 2006 03:18 | #157 Hmmmm....interesting one this....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
burchy Member 241 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Manchester, UK More info | SJK wrote: Do you truly use all the functionality on the 300? If the answer is yes then go for the 30. If the answer is no then go for the 400 as it is just a better 300 and you still need to learn this level of camera. There is a lot to learn just to get all the functionality out of the 300-350-400. I really think it is not that hard. You will know if you need more because you are being held back by the constraints on your equipment. Actually, yes and some more. I've even put the Waisa firmware hack onto it to release more functionality. I think there are two things that are selling the 30D to me currently: Quality and flexibility, (i.e. metering/focus & FPS). Simon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | hodad66 wrote: 10D's gone ... traded for the XT. FPS is nice but I rely upon my surfing knowledge to dictate when I push the shutter. 30D should have had the 10.1 MP's... that was a slap in the face. Unless I give my XT to my girlfriend the trade up to the XTi will cost another $300 - $400. ![]() Why 10? There's no difference between 8 and 10. If you stuffed in two more megapixels, you'd probably have more noise. If you want megapixels, then go for the 5D or 1D. There you have more megapixels but on a bigger sensor. The 30D outperforms the 400D for instance at ISO 800 and 1600. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OpticNein Senior Member 404 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Aug 28, 2006 07:54 | #160 i've sold my rebel xt. 8) Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hodad66 Member 141 posts Likes: 520 Joined Oct 2003 Location: Indialantic, Florida More info | grego wrote: Why 10? There's no difference between 8 and 10. If you stuffed in two more megapixels, you'd probably have more noise. If you want megapixels, then go for the 5D or 1D. There you have more megapixels but on a bigger sensor. The 30D outperforms the 400D for instance at ISO 800 and 1600. BTW, it was more than just FPS that separates the two. 2mp's is what my old Oly 2100 had, I can crop better now with my XT Sony A7RIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MitsuJDM Senior Member 567 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Harrisburg, PA More info | Aug 28, 2006 10:35 | #162 Though the 400D is a little more advanced, It's not going to be enough to make me want one. The new features aren't worth the upgrade IMO. 350D+grip+lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_C Goldmember 4,042 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Tin Mine Country (Cornwall UK) More info | Aug 28, 2006 10:39 | #163 The only thing that would have made me want to upgrade from my 350D would have been if there was some form of 3 stop IS built into the camera, now that would have been a fantastic thing to have included, no more buying expensive lenses just to get IS, hell my Sigma 17-70 would have become an IS lens!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
steved110 Cream of the Crop 5,776 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: East Sussex UK More info | Aug 28, 2006 11:10 | #164 The new 400d is a fantastic looking camera - more MP , bigger LCD but best of all, sensor cleaning! and it is priced pretty reasonably. If I was in the market for a new camera, I'd struggle to choose between this and the 30D Canon 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OpticNein Senior Member 404 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Aug 28, 2006 11:53 | #165 Nick: i don't think canon will put IS in the body. they like it in the lens better. there's an article in Photo Pro magazine explaining how they did it in the lens. 8) Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1739 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||