Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 27 Aug 2006 (Sunday) 22:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

More senior pictures

 
dave_borg98
Senior Member
301 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Owasso, OK
     
Aug 27, 2006 22:29 |  #1

I took some more pictures of Britney and hopefully these are a little better. All C & C is greatly appreciated as I need to learn as much as possible. Here are a fex and the rest can be seen at the link here. (external link)

1.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


2.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


3.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

The world just does not fit conveniently into the format of a 35mm camera. ~W. Eugene Smith
--My Gear List--

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonyaL
Senior Member
609 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Texas
     
Aug 27, 2006 22:45 |  #2

Number two looks a lil bright tune it down a tad.
Number 3- I would like with a tighter crop.

On the site I love 4, 10,.
I like number 2.

Since she smiles so big it squints her eyes I have a daughter who does that or she droops one eye so now I tell her to close them then I say open when I ready to shoot the pic. Its worked out pretty good so far.

Sonya




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_borg98
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
301 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Owasso, OK
     
Aug 28, 2006 06:58 |  #3

After you mention it, I am surely going to bring the exposure down a little on #2. Thanks for the input on the others.


The world just does not fit conveniently into the format of a 35mm camera. ~W. Eugene Smith
--My Gear List--

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raymate
Goldmember
1,736 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto. CA - Bedford. UK
     
Aug 28, 2006 12:02 |  #4

some very nice images . like the last two best . very well done :)


Canon: EOS 5DmkII • 50D • 40D • 350D • 100 f2.8L IS Macro • 70-200 f4L • 24-105 f4L IS • 17-40 f4L • 50 f1.4 • 60 f2.8 Macro • 85 f1.8 • 430EX • 580EX II • ST-E2
Sigma: 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC HSM • 30 f1.4 EX DC HSM • 17-50 f2.8 EX • 24-70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO
Apple: CS3, Aperture & iPhoto. Various Manfrotto, Portaflash, Battery Grips, SanDisk & Lowepro

alamy: my stock photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ashleymcnamara
Goldmember
Avatar
1,192 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Aug 28, 2006 12:09 |  #5

#2 is great!


Cameras & Lenses
Canon 40D, Canon 30D, Canon EF 24-70 2.8L USM ,Canon 70-200 2.8L IS, Canon 50mm 1.4, Canon 15mm Fisheye Canon EF 50mm 1.8 ll, Canon EF-S 18-55
[BLOG] WWW.ASHLEYMCNAMARA.COM​/ARTICLES (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisKing
Member
Avatar
94 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
     
Aug 28, 2006 14:03 |  #6

The first one is nice, however, it's a long shot for a senior portrait. In a wallet size print she would be tiny. In a large print it may actually be ok.

The second one really is great for a Senior Portrait. Nice crop, interesting angle, she looks comfortable, and the background has nice color without being too distracting. However it is a little light overall.

The third shot is a little dark and flat, but with some contrast adjustment you may be able to make it print worthy.


Rebel XT | Kit lens | EF 50/1.8 | 380EX Speedlight | RC-1 Remote
My DeviantArt gallery (external link) | My PBase Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stevie@JC
Goldmember
Avatar
2,588 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 253
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ireland
     
Aug 28, 2006 14:04 |  #7

Nice series of shots of a beautiful girl thanks for sharing


Canon R3 l RF600mm F4 L | RF100-500mm L IS l RF14-35mm L l RF24-105mm F4 L l RF 100 2.8 L | RF 1.4 & 2.0 Ext l RF100mm 2.8 Macro L l Speedlite 580EX II l 600EX II Speedlite l Manfrotto MK055 Pro3 Tripod l Manfrotto MPMXPROA4 Monopd with XPRO monopod+fluid base l Image ProGraf 1000 Printer
"There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_borg98
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
301 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Owasso, OK
     
Aug 28, 2006 14:08 as a reply to  @ ChrisKing's post |  #8

ChrisKing wrote:
The first one is nice, however, it's a long shot for a senior portrait. In a wallet size print she would be tiny. In a large print it may actually be ok.

Should I make it more of a portrait orientation crop? I was wondering about that on a few other also. I imagine they should be but I did not think about that at first.

Thanks for all the comments on these. I know there is still a lot to learn and work on but it is nice to know that I am starting to get a good grasp.


The world just does not fit conveniently into the format of a 35mm camera. ~W. Eugene Smith
--My Gear List--

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Aug 28, 2006 18:42 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

I don't like all the night shots with a flash. Natural light can help a lot.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_borg98
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
301 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Owasso, OK
     
Aug 28, 2006 20:26 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #10

Hellashot wrote:
I don't like all the night shots with a flash. Natural light can help a lot.

I really messed those shots up and tried to recover them as much as I can. I am not that good with PS, but she wanted those ones even after she saw how bad they were. I have not had many overcast days so I tried to shoot at dusk but ran out of light. If I would have slowed the shutter down, would it have exposed more of the background?


The world just does not fit conveniently into the format of a 35mm camera. ~W. Eugene Smith
--My Gear List--

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisKing
Member
Avatar
94 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
     
Sep 13, 2006 12:04 as a reply to  @ dave_borg98's post |  #11

dave_borg98 wrote:
Should I make it more of a portrait orientation crop? I was wondering about that on a few other also. I imagine they should be but I did not think about that at first.

Thanks for all the comments on these. I know there is still a lot to learn and work on but it is nice to know that I am starting to get a good grasp.

I would show them both versions and let them know the reasoning for the crop if they are interested in the shot.

Sorry, I know this is late, but I wanted to at least answer your question.


Rebel XT | Kit lens | EF 50/1.8 | 380EX Speedlight | RC-1 Remote
My DeviantArt gallery (external link) | My PBase Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Sep 13, 2006 14:25 |  #12

There are about 30 rules in portrait photography that if broken weakens the aesthetic appeal of the image. The more rules that are broken, the less appealing the image will be. Here is a list of the rules broken in image # 1. Body is turned 90 degrees away from the camera. 45 degrees is considered the norm. Both arms are straight. Arms should be bent so they flow. Arms, elbows, hands, knees and feet are side by side. Nothing in a portrait that the subject has two of and can be made different should be the same from side to side. Sameness tends to make an image static. I like the lighting in this image.

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ajbalazic
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,228 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Kitchener, ON, Canada
     
Sep 14, 2006 14:07 |  #13

I think the second image is the best from this set.

Benji- do you have any books you would recommend on Portraiture?


Alan
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT
Senior Member
453 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
     
Sep 14, 2006 15:54 |  #14

I think you are very close...

#14 is too soft - mentioned only because it seems out of place because the rest of the images are not.

17, 20 & 21 the bouy in the background distracts the heck out of things. Because it is the brightest item in the picture - the eye is inevitably drawn to it.

#25 if it had been a profile (ie of her head turn slight away) would have been really nice. The lighting is really nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_borg98
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
301 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Owasso, OK
     
Sep 14, 2006 15:55 |  #15

Benji-

That is exactly the review I was wanting. I know I should be able to pick up on the things I did wrong but your post pointed them out plainly. Sometimes I need to be hit with a stick in order to pick up on something. I need to print a few of the write ups you did on posing and keep them with me. Thank you.


The world just does not fit conveniently into the format of a 35mm camera. ~W. Eugene Smith
--My Gear List--

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,802 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
More senior pictures
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2771 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.