Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 28 Aug 2006 (Monday) 10:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Jpegs on DVD's

 
coppi123
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 28, 2006 10:15 |  #1

I'm sure you must have answered this question before but I am new to your forum and cannot find an answer.
Why do my photos look dreadful when viewed on a DVD player with Jpeg facility? My photos look great on my Mac monitor but as soon as I burn them onto a disc and view them on my TV they turn into a pixelated mess.
I have tried reducing the resolution on my Mac before burning but the results are just as bad.
I await your help with great anticipation.
p.s I am using a 7m pixel camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 28, 2006 10:22 |  #2

The 'pixelated mess' blame is caused by TV poor resolution (512 lines is current U.S. broadcast standard); PAL is different. If you go to the HDTV monitors you can get closer, but still NOT equal to computer monitors!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coppi123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 28, 2006 10:31 |  #3

I live in the UK so we have a few more lines than your goodself but your comment on HDTV monitors is interesting as I took my CD to my local Sony franchise and he loaded my photos onto a DVD player and viewed them on a £1500 HDTV ready Sony. Guess what. Results still rubbish. The sales assistant was totally bemused and had no answers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 28, 2006 10:40 |  #4

A lot of HDTV units only support 768 pixels vertically, whereas the best units support 1080 pixels vertically. Could be also that the problem is that your photo CD still has much higher pixel count, and the pixel reduction used by the TV is horrid.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coppi123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 28, 2006 11:58 |  #5

Thank you for your interest and your comments all of which I understand but I'm still stuck with the problem of how can I show my photos on the TV. My family refuse to crowd around the Mac and I cannot afford to print off all my photos.Is there another alternative. What about DVD players that have hard drives and USB connections?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 28, 2006 12:06 |  #6

My point is to change the resolution of the photos to whatever pixel count best matches TV standards! So use Photoshop, for example, to reduce the super high resolution from your camera down to something better matched to the TV.

If you use projectors to show things from a PC, when the screen resolution does not match the native resolution of the projector, images will ALWAYS be inferior to those that are at native resolution of the device, as software interpolation of other resolutions will be inferior in quality to native resolution.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Aug 28, 2006 12:10 |  #7

In order to take advantage of the HDTV you need to connect it to the computer using DVI input. Most HDTV today offer only the HDMI connection w/ afew offering DVI or both. The problem is that most DVD player are design to play movies and such for TV and not for PC quality.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ByteTheBullet
Member
Avatar
94 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: U.S.A
     
Aug 28, 2006 13:21 |  #8

Could the program you are using be reducing the quality of the pics? I made a DVD for my father-in-law and his friends. They wanted a trip DVD, three different cameras and resolutions and they all looked fine.

How does the DVD look when played on your PC?


ByteTheBullet (-:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coppi123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 28, 2006 14:30 |  #9

My Mac only has a CD burner but if photos look OK on a DVD disc then that is another good reason for me to buy the latest iMac. I think I will experiment on my freinds PC first and see what kind of results I get. Thank you.I still cannot get my head round this "resolution " business. How come my digital movie images look OK on my TV and why do some still shots that I take on my digital movie camera look OK ?That only has 1.9m pixels .I've just burnt another disc dropping the resolution to 640 x 480.Still rubbish but not as bad as my other efforts. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 28, 2006 14:39 as a reply to  @ coppi123's post |  #10

coppi123 wrote:
How come my digital movie images look OK on my TV and why do some still shots that I take on my digital movie camera look OK ?That only has 1.9m pixels .I've just burnt another disc dropping the resolution to 640 x 480.Still rubbish but not as bad as my other efforts. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh

Digital movies only have 640 x 480 resolution! A single frame from that movie is no different than the movie itself.

coppi123 wrote:
I've just burnt another disc dropping the resolution to 640 x 480.Still rubbish but not as bad as my other efforts. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh

I'm out of ideas, if you tried that already!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coppi123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 29, 2006 02:19 |  #11

Well I took some more photos using an old Fuji 2m pixel camera. Burnt it dropping the resolution to 640x480 and the resulting images looked like old Kodak 400 a.s.a film.
I think this is the best I'm going to get. Shame realy. Great camera equipment, great computer equipment,crap TV's. Thank you all for your time and help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Aug 30, 2006 13:48 |  #12

Even if played on a HD screen, DVD is not an HD format. There are HD disc formats around, but nothing really standarised yet.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Aug 31, 2006 16:44 as a reply to  @ coppi123's post |  #13

coppi123 wrote:
Well I took some more photos using an old Fuji 2m pixel camera. Burnt it dropping the resolution to 640x480 and the resulting images looked like old Kodak 400 a.s.a film.
I think this is the best I'm going to get. Shame realy. Great camera equipment, great computer equipment,crap TV's. Thank you all for your time and help.

Agreeed...once yo lower the quality to the TV;s level it will look better...sad, but true...


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,358 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 2730
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Sep 02, 2006 10:22 |  #14

coppi123,
I backup all my full size (4368x2912px with my 5D and 3072x2048px with my 10D) jpeg photos to CDr, and can just drop the CD into my or someone else's DVD player (assuming the DVD player shows jpeg files) and the jpeg photos show up great (to there eyes) :D I have confirmed this on three DVD players that the full size jpeg file shows up great on a TV (even on a large LCD TV). Of course if viewing less then 6 inches away a print will beat a TV :D
Oh yea, even my wife's Canon A300 photos show up great :)


Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,765 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Jpegs on DVD's
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1723 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.