Frank_Hollahan Goldmember  2,718 posts Likes: 97 Joined Feb 2005 More info | Aug 28, 2006 16:50 | #1 I guess I can say these images weren't intended to show a scenic view but rather a little foreground with clouds as the background. Something a little different I thought I'd try. What do you think.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop  9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Aug 28, 2006 17:19 | #2  Permanent banI like the contrast and colours of the 1st one Frank but i don`t like the lack of midground,it seems very compact which is something that the 2nd one has and it looks pretty good too. My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AnthonyJHowe Cream of the Crop  6,935 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Rhos-on-sea UK More info | Aug 28, 2006 17:24 | #3 Goodness me it is cloudy frank, looks like it's going to pour down with rain soon. Canon 5D + Canon 20D + Canon EOS 300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
racketman Cream of the Crop  More info | Aug 28, 2006 17:32 | #4 I like both of them. Looks like great hiking territory (until it rains). Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JT Goldmember  2,224 posts Likes: 17 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI More info | Aug 28, 2006 17:53 | #5 I agree with Dimitri about the lack of a "midground" and compact feeling in the first one. Therefore, #2 does it for me. Very nice contrast. - 5D & 60D (x2), EFS 10-22, EF 17-40L, EF 50 f1.4, EF 24-105L, EF 100-400 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Buggbairn Goldmember  2,374 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Falkirk Scotland More info | Aug 28, 2006 17:56 | #6 Love the colours in them Frank
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HrcRacing Goldmember  2,019 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: NE Florida, USA More info | Very nice shots Frank. I like them both but the second one is really nice. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Suedezu Goldmember  1,512 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Romania More info | Aug 29, 2006 03:27 | #8 Interesting shots! General gallery: http://andreimorar.zenfolio.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndreaV Member 84 posts Joined Aug 2006 More info | Aug 29, 2006 03:59 | #9 I like the second one, the first one IMHO is too light in the foreground and dark in the background... Andrea Verni
LOG IN TO REPLY |
catsith Mighty Award Winner  6,265 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: brisbane australia More info | Aug 29, 2006 04:04 | #10 i like them both, even though i see what the others are saying about no1. Tina
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StewartR "your nose is too big"  4,269 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Maidenhead, UK More info | I think I would have tried it without anything in the foreground. It's just a distraction that gets in the way of the main subject, which is the clouds. With #2 you've got a lovely horizon line of the mountains, so I'd try cropping it so that 20% of the photo is mountain, 20% is sky below the clouds, and 60% is clouds. Your profile doesn't say 'Image editing OK' so I haven't tried a quick workup, but I'd be happy to if it's OK with you... www.LensesForHire.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StewartR wrote: I think I would have tried it without anything in the foreground. It's just a distraction that gets in the way of the main subject, which is the clouds. With #2 you've got a lovely horizon line of the mountains, so I'd try cropping it so that 20% of the photo is mountain, 20% is sky below the clouds, and 60% is clouds. Your profile doesn't say 'Image editing OK' so I haven't tried a quick workup, but I'd be happy to if it's OK with you... Yes Stewart feel free to edit my images if you wish. I like to see what others can do with it.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KAS Goldmember 1,102 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Niagara Region, Canada More info | Aug 29, 2006 19:21 | #13 ....I see a bird pooped on the rock in the 2nd one. 1Ds MkIII, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 16-35 f/2.8L II, EF 100mm F/2.8, EF 35 f/1.4L, EF 50 f/1.2L, EF 85 f/1.2L II)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Raindancer Goldmember  1,055 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: East Anglia More info | Nice shots Frank and looks very foreboding!!!!! No 2 is the one for me..... Roger
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StewartR "your nose is too big" 4,269 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Maidenhead, UK More info | OK Frank, here's a couple of quick crops of #2. Neither is quite what I'd have been after: I think I'd have wanted the style of the first crop (i.e. nothing in the foreground) but the shape of the second crop (more panoramic). I can't be bothered (and more to the point I don't think I have the skills!) to try to clone out the rock and replace it with more hills, but if I did then that would achieve the sort of effect I'd be looking for in the secne. Hope you find it interesting!  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. www.LensesForHire.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1524 guests, 189 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
