I realize that the lens is only as good as the glass in front of it but I thought one could buy excellent UV lenses that would not degrade the lens behind it. How about a B+W filter? If this is not a good choice what is?
| POLL: "Do you use a UV filter/protector on your lenses?" |
Yes. All of them. (Please state why) | 161 46.5% |
Yes, Some of them. (Please state why) | 70 20.2% |
No. (Please state why) | 115 33.2% |
HughScot Member 178 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Aug 31, 2006 17:39 | #46 I realize that the lens is only as good as the glass in front of it but I thought one could buy excellent UV lenses that would not degrade the lens behind it. How about a B+W filter? If this is not a good choice what is? Hugh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | Nick_C wrote: No thats rubbish, or at least thats what I have found, I dont use the real cheapest UV filters like the ones from Kood, but I dont use the best ones either, on my Sigma 17-70 I have a Hoya G Series, its coated but probably only a thin layer. When I did some tests I locked the focus & had the camera on a tripod, mirror lockup too, although it was a sunny day so the shutter speed was high enough to avoid tripod & mirror lockup, but what the hell, I did it anyway, when I examined the 2 photos side by side there was no differences at all, both the same contrast, both the same sharpness. Im actually quite suprised (even alarmed) at how many people own really expensive lenses & dont have any protection on the end, a hood provides very little. On my old P&S camera which didnt take filters, I went to the beach & one time I remember seeing lots of spots on the lens, it was only sea spray but it was so greasy! sea water is also very corrosive due to the salt content, it cleaned off but being as most front elements on lenses are curved it was hard to get in the very corners, a UV on the other hand is flat & dead easy to clean. My old UV filter even has slight scratches, now I look after my gear & always replace the lens cap, I even have a cap that goes over the UV filter to protect THAT! & still its showing little faint scratches, that would have been the front element!! where as when I remove the UV for cleaning the actual lens is the same as the day I got it, not a mark or spec of dust. Nick ![]() I'm with all the folks who use a UV for protection. I use a Hoya HMC SuperUV (0). I would'nt want anything to happen to my only lens. Glad to hear "the story" about UV filters making your pics soft is rubbish
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackviolet Goldmember 1,313 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2004 Location: sydney, au (now in singapore for a few years) More info | Aug 31, 2006 18:22 | #48 lens hood here, too. why put glass in between good lens element and the subject - softy or not... --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | Aug 31, 2006 18:25 | #49 |
GTogs Goldmember 1,175 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: NW Iowa More info | Aug 31, 2006 19:54 | #50 When I got my first lenses and camera, I used UV filters on all of them. I was taking pictures of sunsets in Maui and found a lot of flare problems. Togs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RHardman Goldmember 1,514 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2005 Location: 29 Palms, Ca. More info | Aug 31, 2006 20:12 | #51 What's the point. Your adding more glass to the lens to introduce unwanted effects. It already has a lens hood which protects the lens. I do use CP's or ND's when I feel they will add to the image other then that they are off. I do have lenses that are 25+ years old, have some scratches and you cannot tell they were there on the print. If I scratch a lens that bad then it's time for a new lens by making a claim to the insurance company. "Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stratos Senior Member 259 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Madeira Island More info | Aug 31, 2006 20:23 | #52 well i use skyights filters on my lenses for protection Canon 7D | Canon 20D | Canon 70-200 2.8L | Tammy 90 2.8 Di | Canon 10-22 EF-S | Canon 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tracerbullet Senior Member 282 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: St. Paul, MN More info | Aug 31, 2006 21:45 | #53 I've gotten now to where I put the filter on if I think there's a chance something bad will happen - dog noses, kids, a branch from a tree in the woods. If there's a little less chance of that (landscape shots), I use the hood and skip the filter altogether. http:// …Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 31, 2006 22:00 | #54 I answered no. I haven't completed any controlled tests or anything, but my feeling is that somehow the UV filter I was using was causing poorer AF for my 20D. Also, I feel that the protection a filter offers is over-rated. I've had an SLR for 30 years and never damaged the front element or of any of my lenses or a filter. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpeng168 Hatchling 4 posts Joined Jul 2006 More info | Aug 31, 2006 23:31 | #55 I've got kids with dirty hands... 20D | BG-E2 | 430EX | EFS 17-85 f/4.0-5.6 IS | EF 50 f/1.8 MkI | EF 70-210 f/4.0 | Sigma 24-70 f/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrclark321 Noinker 7,537 posts Likes: 23 Joined Mar 2005 Location: .... with a long history More info | solinger wrote: I don't see the point of another piece of glass, unless it's for an effect. [EDIT] I always use a hood though. Dito Sony A7R3 & A7R4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 01, 2006 21:32 | #57 It's just another piece of glass between my subject and my recording medium... Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JamieHolladay Cream of the Crop 21,557 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Gadsden, Alabama, USA More info | Sep 01, 2006 21:42 | #58 I do for simple protection. I am clumbsy sometimes. I also get close to the ground when I shot cars and I had rather let a filter touch the ground than a lens. The Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Sep 01, 2006 22:14 | #59 In the summer I shoot softball and I live in windy Iowa. since we rarely have no sand, dirt, dust, dogs, cats, or small children etc.. blowing around, I always use a filter, but only the highest quality. In the winter I shoot indoor sports and do not use filters. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OiPaz Senior Member 704 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 More info | I use it only when necessary: near the sea, in dusty environment and so on. http://www.oipaz.net/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1822 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||