Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Aug 2006 (Monday) 21:29
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Do you use a UV filter/protector on your lenses?"
Yes. All of them. (Please state why)
161
46.5%
Yes, Some of them. (Please state why)
70
20.2%
No. (Please state why)
115
33.2%

346 voters, 346 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Poll: Do you use UV filters/protectors on your lenses?

 
HughScot
Member
Avatar
178 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
     
Aug 31, 2006 17:39 |  #46

I realize that the lens is only as good as the glass in front of it but I thought one could buy excellent UV lenses that would not degrade the lens behind it. How about a B+W filter? If this is not a good choice what is?


Hugh
Canon 40D, EF 24-105mm f4L IS, EF 35-135, EF 70-200 f2.8L IS, EF-S 10-22, EF 100mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 18-200 OS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beachgirl
Goldmember
Avatar
1,099 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay)
     
Aug 31, 2006 17:46 as a reply to  @ post 1926563 |  #47

Nick_C wrote:
No thats rubbish, or at least thats what I have found, I dont use the real cheapest UV filters like the ones from Kood, but I dont use the best ones either, on my Sigma 17-70 I have a Hoya G Series, its coated but probably only a thin layer.

When I did some tests I locked the focus & had the camera on a tripod, mirror lockup too, although it was a sunny day so the shutter speed was high enough to avoid tripod & mirror lockup, but what the hell, I did it anyway, when I examined the 2 photos side by side there was no differences at all, both the same contrast, both the same sharpness.

Im actually quite suprised (even alarmed) at how many people own really expensive lenses & dont have any protection on the end, a hood provides very little.

On my old P&S camera which didnt take filters, I went to the beach & one time I remember seeing lots of spots on the lens, it was only sea spray but it was so greasy! sea water is also very corrosive due to the salt content, it cleaned off but being as most front elements on lenses are curved it was hard to get in the very corners, a UV on the other hand is flat & dead easy to clean.

My old UV filter even has slight scratches, now I look after my gear & always replace the lens cap, I even have a cap that goes over the UV filter to protect THAT! & still its showing little faint scratches, that would have been the front element!! where as when I remove the UV for cleaning the actual lens is the same as the day I got it, not a mark or spec of dust.

Nick :-)

I'm with all the folks who use a UV for protection. I use a Hoya HMC SuperUV (0). I would'nt want anything to happen to my only lens. Glad to hear "the story" about UV filters making your pics soft is rubbish:D
THANKS Nick.




http://pinksandcastle.​smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackviolet
Goldmember
Avatar
1,313 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2004
Location: sydney, au (now in singapore for a few years)
     
Aug 31, 2006 18:22 |  #48

lens hood here, too. why put glass in between good lens element and the subject - softy or not...


--
oblio
1dmkiii - 5dmkii -Leica M8/M6 - Mamiya 645AFDiii/zd
ModelMayhem (external link) | my (external link)flick (external link)r gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beachgirl
Goldmember
Avatar
1,099 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay)
     
Aug 31, 2006 18:25 |  #49

I always forget about the hood, Doh!!




http://pinksandcastle.​smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GTogs
Goldmember
1,175 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: NW Iowa
     
Aug 31, 2006 19:54 |  #50

When I got my first lenses and camera, I used UV filters on all of them. I was taking pictures of sunsets in Maui and found a lot of flare problems.

After reading all the posts about this 2 years ago, I dropped the filters and added hoods full time.


Togs
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
Avatar
1,514 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: 29 Palms, Ca.
     
Aug 31, 2006 20:12 |  #51

What's the point. Your adding more glass to the lens to introduce unwanted effects. It already has a lens hood which protects the lens. I do use CP's or ND's when I feel they will add to the image other then that they are off. I do have lenses that are 25+ years old, have some scratches and you cannot tell they were there on the print. If I scratch a lens that bad then it's time for a new lens by making a claim to the insurance company.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desert (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stratos
Senior Member
Avatar
259 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Madeira Island
     
Aug 31, 2006 20:23 |  #52

well i use skyights filters on my lenses for protection

well at least when im shoting rally i dont want a lil rock from the road hit my lens and scratch it


Canon 7D | Canon 20D | Canon 70-200 2.8L | Tammy 90 2.8 Di | Canon 10-22 EF-S | Canon 430EX
"Best Off" Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracer ­ bullet
Senior Member
Avatar
282 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
     
Aug 31, 2006 21:45 |  #53

I've gotten now to where I put the filter on if I think there's a chance something bad will happen - dog noses, kids, a branch from a tree in the woods. If there's a little less chance of that (landscape shots), I use the hood and skip the filter altogether.


http:// …Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Aug 31, 2006 22:00 |  #54

I answered no. I haven't completed any controlled tests or anything, but my feeling is that somehow the UV filter I was using was causing poorer AF for my 20D. Also, I feel that the protection a filter offers is over-rated. I've had an SLR for 30 years and never damaged the front element or of any of my lenses or a filter.

I use a hood instead, unless I'm using my circ pol and constantly switching from landscape to portrait and back.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpeng168
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Aug 31, 2006 23:31 |  #55

I've got kids with dirty hands...:)


20D | BG-E2 | 430EX | EFS 17-85 f/4.0-5.6 IS | EF 50 f/1.8 MkI | EF 70-210 f/4.0 | Sigma 24-70 f/2.8
Canon SD500 | BlackBerry Curve | Samsung a900
FS Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 EX DG

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrclark321
Noinker
Avatar
7,537 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Mar 2005
Location: .... with a long history
     
Aug 31, 2006 23:40 as a reply to  @ post 1915295 |  #56

solinger wrote:
I don't see the point of another piece of glass, unless it's for an effect.

[EDIT] I always use a hood though.

Dito


Sony A7R3 & A7R4
Sony 16-35 GM
Sony 55mm 1.8
Batis 85mm
Sony 200-600

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Sep 01, 2006 21:32 |  #57

It's just another piece of glass between my subject and my recording medium...

If one is good, would two be better? Three? Real protection with four?:lol:


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jamie ­ Holladay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,557 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Gadsden, Alabama, USA
     
Sep 01, 2006 21:42 |  #58

I do for simple protection. I am clumbsy sometimes. I also get close to the ground when I shot cars and I had rather let a filter touch the ground than a lens.


The Site  (external link)The Gallery  (external link)The Gear (external link)

"If you really want something done, ask a busy person." Toms wife

Nothing is more Exhilarating than combining my two passions, the speed of a shutter, the speed of a car; What a Rush! ~ me

What stands between you and greatness sits between your ears, not in your camera bag. ~ John Thawley

You know I can't spell just sound it out. ~ me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Sep 01, 2006 22:14 |  #59

In the summer I shoot softball and I live in windy Iowa. since we rarely have no sand, dirt, dust, dogs, cats, or small children etc.. blowing around, I always use a filter, but only the highest quality. In the winter I shoot indoor sports and do not use filters.


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OiPaz
Senior Member
Avatar
704 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
     
Sep 02, 2006 00:16 as a reply to  @ post 1915370 |  #60

I use it only when necessary: near the sea, in dusty environment and so on.
But the hood is *always* on, in *every* lens! ;)


http://www.oipaz.net/ (external link)Who needs a gear list, when you can have a Gear Graph (external link)!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,041 views & 0 likes for this thread, 74 members have posted to it.
Poll: Do you use UV filters/protectors on your lenses?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1822 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.