Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 29 Aug 2006 (Tuesday) 10:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Evaluative & Multi-Spot Metering

 
Shasta
Goldmember
Avatar
1,244 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Windsor, ON Canada
     
Aug 29, 2006 10:24 |  #1

I tried my hand the other day while sitting at the marina at spot metering and wanted to know a few things regarding metering differences.

Is there a technique to multi-spot metering? I tried it and this was the difference.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


I found the Eval was more accurate or at least exposed better. Does it matter in the sequence of capturing the 3 metering points?

:)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mnealtx
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo
     
Aug 29, 2006 10:59 |  #2

Evaluative takes the whole scene into consideration and recommends an exposure for the entire frame to make a medium gray valued exposure. Spot metering does the same, but only for the spot you metered on. The camera doesn't "store" the spots and average them or anything like that.

I'm guessing you used the exposure recommended for #3 when you took the shot, correct?


Mike
Suggestions / critiques always welcomed - help me learn!https://photography-on-the.net …alphotography.s​mugmug.comMy Smugmug site (external link)
Gear Listing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shasta
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,244 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Windsor, ON Canada
     
Aug 29, 2006 11:05 |  #3

Oh is that how spot works. I thought it averaged the 3 spots and set the exposure. I don't think I even touched it after the third spot, just fired the shutter. How dumb am I.

Thanks for that information Mike, I will go back to my manual and re read.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mnealtx
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo
     
Aug 29, 2006 11:09 |  #4

Absolutely not to worry, Shasta... I thought it was something similar to that, too, until I was reading up on some stuff on the internet the other day. I haven't had a chance to apply what I've read yet, but hopefully in the next couple days...

Best of luck with the pics!


Mike
Suggestions / critiques always welcomed - help me learn!https://photography-on-the.net …alphotography.s​mugmug.comMy Smugmug site (external link)
Gear Listing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 29, 2006 11:10 |  #5

As with all things, what the cam thinks is the "correct" exposure isn't (usually) the right exposure? Too many factors come into it to let some programming geek at Canon try to figure it out for me. So I usually shoot on "M", meter for the important highlights & let RAW take care of the shadows.
Gray Card…White Paper. What’s best?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 29, 2006 11:15 |  #6

Cameras which are DESIGNED to support multispot average, can do what you want. Olympus OM-4 was the first camera to offer multispot, and you could even tell the meter that a specific spot represented a highlight or a shadow area and it would compensate! Today, I believe that the top end Canons (1DsII) support multispot.

In your example, the spot metered result is underexposed compared to the evaluative mode. That suprises me, if #3 was the last spot sampled...as that is a relatively low reflectance portion of the scene, I would have expected it to result in overexpose slightly, not slight underexposure! It seems like the sky (labelled #2) was actually the last point metered, as it is close to 18% grey.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shasta
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,244 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Windsor, ON Canada
     
Aug 29, 2006 12:24 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #7

Wilt wrote:
Cameras which are DESIGNED to support multispot average, can do what you want. Olympus OM-4 was the first camera to offer multispot, and you could even tell the meter that a specific spot represented a highlight or a shadow area and it would compensate! Today, I believe that the top end Canons (1DsII) support multispot.

In your example, the spot metered result is underexposed compared to the evaluative mode. That suprises me, if #3 was the last spot sampled...as that is a relatively low reflectance portion of the scene, I would have expected it to result in overexpose slightly, not slight underexposure! It seems like the sky (labelled #2) was actually the last point metered, as it is close to 18% grey.

I may very well could have mixed up the order of the selection. I do find when in manual mode and Eval metering compensating at +1/3 gives my pictures a better dynamic range. Canon 1D.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 29, 2006 12:40 |  #8

Your 1D does indeed have multispot capability! I suggest you refer to the Owner's Manual to make sure you know how that feature is accessed.

Averaging two bright (sky, reflection on water) and one darkish (the dock float) could still result in underexposure of the scene, even if you did use multispot correctly in terms of the mechanical access to the feature.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mnealtx
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo
     
Aug 30, 2006 07:08 |  #9

I apologize, Shasta... I gave you bad info!!


Mike
Suggestions / critiques always welcomed - help me learn!https://photography-on-the.net …alphotography.s​mugmug.comMy Smugmug site (external link)
Gear Listing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,621 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Evaluative & Multi-Spot Metering
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2495 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.