Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Aug 2006 (Tuesday) 23:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Well I did it. 300 2.8

 
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Aug 30, 2006 09:53 as a reply to  @ post 1920727 |  #31

MDJAK wrote:
I keep trying to tell people you don't need an ultra wide for great landscape shots. The proof is in the pudding, right here.

mark

BBBUUUTTTTT!!!! Ultra-wides are so much fun and almost 3k cheaper. ;)


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AeroSmith
Goldmember
Avatar
4,600 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 536
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida
     
Aug 30, 2006 10:14 |  #32

Dante King wrote:
I think I'm turning primeses, I think I'm turning primese, I really think so!! Sold off all my slow compromise zooms and got this. Should be here next week.

How about a little 300 2.8 love from you 300 2.8 holders? Pics I mean you sick bastages!!!

Good man! Primes rule. I keep thinking about maybe getting a zoom but then my primes keep pulling me back....."forget the zoom and get a second body," they whisper to me in my sleep...."we're faster....sharper...li​ghter," they say.

I picked up a 300/2.8 last week but have yet to have a chance to really try it out. I'm very much looking forward to seeing what she can do. I guess I'll be keeping the 300/4 for now as it's one of my favorite flower shooters. But it would not surprise me if the 2.8 with a 1.4x or an ET is even better.

Anyway, congrats. I look forward to seeing your images.


Josh Smith

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Aug 30, 2006 10:39 |  #33

Dante King wrote:
Sold off all my slow compromise zooms and got this.

How are the three finest 2.8 zooms any slower than a 300 2.8? Focus speed, maybe. Not aperture.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Aug 30, 2006 10:41 as a reply to  @ Ronald S. Jr.'s post |  #34

Ronald S. Jr. wrote:
How are the three finest 2.8 zooms any slower than a 300 2.8? Focus speed, maybe. Not aperture.

Where exactly is a Canon 300mm 2.8 zoom? I don't know what he sold but if it was the 70-200 2.8 and the 24-70 2.8 Dante went nuts!!!!!!!!


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Aug 30, 2006 10:47 |  #35

All that tech stuff doesn't matter. Now the kids are running around he needed something longer to shoot them with without having to get out of the deckchair or put down his beer.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Aug 30, 2006 11:23 |  #36

Big congrats to you, I just got mine three weeks ago :)


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malla1962
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,714 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk
     
Aug 30, 2006 11:47 as a reply to  @ calicokat's post |  #37

I think you will like that lens.I used the 1.4 T-con on the Apache.

IMAGE: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q1776.jpg
IMAGE: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q0743.jpg
IMAGE: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q0448.jpg
IMAGE: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/malla1962/MO2Q0455.jpg

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Aug 30, 2006 11:51 |  #38

Everybody knows the 400mm is really where it's at... :D


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Aug 30, 2006 11:51 as a reply to  @ morehtml's post |  #39

morehtml wrote:
Where exactly is a Canon 300mm 2.8 zoom? I don't know what he sold but if it was the 70-200 2.8 and the 24-70 2.8 Dante went nuts!!!!!!!!

Didn't say there was a 300 2.8 zoom.

Like I said, though, he sold the 16-35L, 24-70L, and 70-200L IS.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Aug 30, 2006 11:54 as a reply to  @ morehtml's post |  #40

morehtml wrote:
Where exactly is a Canon 300mm 2.8 zoom? I don't know what he sold but if it was the 70-200 2.8 and the 24-70 2.8 Dante went nuts!!!!!!!!

i can state unequivocally that he sold the 24-70L.....said i, as i screwed the lens onto my camera .........:D .

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Aug 30, 2006 11:56 |  #41

Oh, you got his? You've got it, then? How ya like it? Niiiice, huh? ;-)a


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Aug 30, 2006 12:12 |  #42

Thanks guys.

Ed got the best of the best, IF you are into compromise lenses.

Yes, All primes. These 3 zooms were just collecting dust. So to be happy, they had to go to finance this new purchase. I am in contract negotiations with a sherpa to walk around with me! :):):)


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,010 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1331
Joined May 2004
Location: Powell, WY
     
Aug 30, 2006 12:19 |  #43

Use it in good health, Dante.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Aug 30, 2006 12:19 |  #44

From the man who said he'd just realized how wonderful the 24-70L is and what great colors, contrast, and sharpness he got from it. "Using it more and more". Oh well. Anything to validate a purchase. ;-)a However, I almost take offense to seeing the 70-200L IS 24-70L and 16-35L called "compromise" lenses. They're no compromise. They're the best of the best.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Aug 30, 2006 12:24 |  #45

One day yall...one day...


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,667 views & 0 likes for this thread, 65 members have posted to it.
Well I did it. 300 2.8
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2765 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.