Fantastic pic's Fretnomore. I especially like two. I can't believe the clarity/sharpness of this lens...wow.
Thanks! It sure can do even better with a better photographer than I am though. It's a superb lens.
AndersÖstberg Goldmember 3,395 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Sweden More info | Peregrin wrote: Fantastic pic's Fretnomore. I especially like two. I can't believe the clarity/sharpness of this lens...wow. Thanks! It sure can do even better with a better photographer than I am though. It's a superb lens. Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrclark321 Noinker 7,537 posts Likes: 23 Joined Mar 2005 Location: .... with a long history More info | Dante these threads are dangerous...Wonder how mamy members are reading this thread and looking at there line-up and bank account and saying Sony A7R3 & A7R4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
busterboy Goldmember 1,436 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Yorkshire Born n Bred. More info | mrclark321 wrote: Dante these threads are dangerous...Wonder how mamy members are reading this thread and looking at there line-up and bank account and saying "damn I want a 300 f/2.8.....can I do it"............not me...LOL ![]() Dan Not me Dan, I got one.. [COLOR=blue][COLOR=black][COLOR=blue]| Canon 1DMkIII | 16-35mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm F/2.8L IS | Canon 1.4X Extender | Canon 2X Extender |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing THREAD STARTER "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | mrclark321 wrote: Dante these threads are dangerous...Wonder how mamy members are reading this thread and looking at there line-up and bank account and saying "damn I want a 300 f/2.8..... Dan, I only wanted to be like Busterboy!! Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 05, 2006 18:22 | #110 I am thinking, damn I want Canon to release the 200 F/1.8L with IS "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing THREAD STARTER "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | calicokat wrote: I am thinking, damn I want Canon to release the 200 F/1.8L with IS ![]() I'll second that!!! Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Sep 05, 2006 18:51 | #112 hey dante dont forget your wide end, surely you must add the 14 prime to your collection to round it out. You know i felt sure petkal would have showed up to yell at you for buying a supertele finally... think he would have installed some sort of "dante got a new L" radar by now to catch such things. anyone heard from him? Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hey, DANTE did you get it yet? For goodness sake, I can't take it any longer. Post a picture of it and pictures taken with it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 05, 2006 19:26 | #114 $550, $900, and $750-800, respectively. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Sep 05, 2006 19:48 | #115 i think our resident market anlyst has done a dandy job on your pricecheck Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ronald S. Jr. wrote: $550, $900, and $750-800, respectively. Really? You don't say. Hmm, that's definitely food for thought.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Sep 05, 2006 20:14 | #117 you would definitly want to sell the seperatly methinks. not too many people would buy all of them at once. are you really going to let go of the 135 though. *gasp* Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 05, 2006 20:16 | #118 Yes, you gave them away. If I were to sell those things, and they were presumably in the best condition possible, as all my gear is, I would set that package at roughly that price. A year ago, you could have gotten at least a couple hundred more just on the 20D. With the extra ink, I'd say at least $1,800. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Billginthekeys wrote: are you really going to let go of the 135 though. *gasp* I recall him saying once that he was sorely let down by the low light performance of the AF on the 135. True, it may have been an isolated incident, as many shooters rely on this lens for spectacular results on a regular basis, but if you're not happy, you're not happy. Suffice to say, he will be supremely satisfied with a 300 2.8L IS. As would I. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ronald S. Jr. wrote: I recall him saying once that he was sorely let down by the low light performance of the AF on the 135. Ronald, you have not only an amazing memory, but a very accurate one too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2790 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||