1200mm f/5.6
180mm f/3.5 Macro
70-200 f/2.8
That's my line-up. I think canon has everyone else beat in these lenses.
JNunn Senior Member 538 posts Joined May 2006 More info | Sep 01, 2006 15:12 | #16 1200mm f/5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baybud Senior Member 419 posts Joined Feb 2006 More info | i bought the 180 macro today, due mainly because i'm fed up with the working distance of the 65mpe, 'tis a wonderful lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 01, 2006 15:23 | #18 Most everything I can't afford? Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CorruptedPhotographer Goldmember 1,802 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2005 Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates More info | Sep 01, 2006 15:47 | #20 |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Sep 01, 2006 15:55 | #21 For PJ package: Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
illy Senior Member 649 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: London More info | sissi wrote: What is next, Hubble's tele? Has it got a red stripe? Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
foxbat Goldmember 2,432 posts Likes: 11 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Essex, UK. More info | Sep 01, 2006 16:11 | #23 You can pretty much choose any of Canon's telephoto primes above and including the 135mm f/2 knowing that you've got the best. Below that Canon are easily beaten by the equivalent Leica or Zeiss offering. Noteable exceptions to that rule are the superb 35mm f/1.4 and the 85mm f/1.2. Andy Brown; South-east England. Canon, Sigma, Leica, Zeiss all on Canon DSLRs. My hacking blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LaniKai "blissfully unaware" 2,136 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Connecticut More info | Sep 01, 2006 16:34 | #24 The holy trinity, I suppose. That would pretty much cover the standard range. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | 1Ds MKIII Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005 10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | 1DsMKII My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 01, 2006 17:15 | #27 200 2.0? Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
estart Member 87 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: NJ More info | Sep 01, 2006 17:42 | #28 400L 2.8 Frank canon20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Ronald S. Jr. wrote: 200 2.0? ![]() He must have a heard start on Photokina. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aero145 Senior Member 909 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Germany More info | Sep 01, 2006 19:34 | #30 EF 14mm f/2.8L USM EOS 5D Mark II | EF24-105 f/4L IS | EF100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | EF200 f/2.8L II | 580EX | Manfrotto 055xProB + 808RC4, and 679B
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2660 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||