Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 03 Sep 2006 (Sunday) 11:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A suitable head monopod head for the Manfrotto 680B?

 
fi20100
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Sep 03, 2006 11:09 |  #1

I just picked up the Manfrotto 680B monopod. Now I’m looking for a sensibly priced monopod head.

One possibility that I’ve seen is the Manfrotto 3232 Swivel Tilt Monopod head. I understand that the weight capacity of it isn’t great, but at the moment I have no heavy lens, and the heaviest I will ever get would probably be a 24-70mm f/2.8 L.

Any suggestions?

-Fi20100


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 03, 2006 12:24 |  #2

I prefer to use a Bogen/Manfrotto 486RC2 ball head on my 680B monopod. It seems that quite a few folks on the forums have followed my recommendation (or have thought of it themselves) and like the combination. It allows you a lot of versatility that the one-way tilt head won't give you.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Sep 03, 2006 12:47 |  #3

Ok. I did consider a ballhead at first, but that I thought that it would be harder to handle on a monopod. I guessed that a ballhead would work better for a tripod.

Since I don’t have any experience of a ballhead, my perception might be very wrong ;)

Thanks for the recommendation though. I will defenitly think of it as an option.

-Fi20100


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Sep 03, 2006 15:24 |  #4

I also prefer the 486RC2 on my monopods. Tried the 3232 and it just didn't cut it. I prefer the multiple degrees of freedom I have with the ball head.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dewmuw
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,024 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Wirral, UK
     
Sep 03, 2006 15:25 |  #5

Doesn't that depend on what you are going to be using it for? I have the 488RC2 and it's great.


Damian Waters
www.drumimages.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,912 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10102
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Sep 03, 2006 16:32 |  #6

I do prefer the 3232, and note that the rated weight capacity is much lower than reality. It works pretty well with the EF 500mm. I have an Arca QR on it. But yes, it depends on how you use it as to whether the tilt only will be adequate. Many use monopods with no head for the big guns.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Sep 04, 2006 01:39 |  #7

Thanks for all advices. Perhaps the best thing would be to get both the 486RC2 and the 3232. When I sometimes get a better tripod (have some cheap Velbon now that I got for my handycam a long time ago), I guess it will be good to have both heads.


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lungdoc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario Canada
     
Sep 04, 2006 06:58 |  #8

I would recommend a 488RC2 for tripod use because it has a separate panning control compared with 486. On a monopod that's not really necessary since you can spin the whole "stick". I do like the 486RC2 on my 480B (thanks to the forum's recommendations); it's a good size/weight and the ballhead allows use of monopod in various angles so you can use your feet as the rest of the "tripod". I just got an extra RC2 plate adapter that screwed into my circa 1982 old tripod's 3 way head allowing me to use the quick release plates and it works well.


Mark
My Smugmug (external link) Eos 7D, Canon G1X II, Canon 15-85 IS, Canon 17-85 IS, Sigma 100-300 EX IF HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 50-150 2.8, Sigma 1.4 EX DG , Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22, Canon 430EX,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Sep 04, 2006 07:14 |  #9

I just think the 486RC2 is more sensibly priced. I rather save a bit on the tripod / monopod equipment, and put a bit more in the lenses. In a perfect world, price would not be an issue ;)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lungdoc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario Canada
     
Sep 04, 2006 07:33 |  #10

In that case I'd suggest either just getting a 486 and using for now for both tripod and monopod or just getting a 3232 for monopod and get 488 later for tripod.


Mark
My Smugmug (external link) Eos 7D, Canon G1X II, Canon 15-85 IS, Canon 17-85 IS, Sigma 100-300 EX IF HSM, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 Macro, Sigma 50-150 2.8, Sigma 1.4 EX DG , Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22, Canon 430EX,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Sep 04, 2006 08:12 as a reply to  @ lungdoc's post |  #11

lungdoc wrote:
In that case I'd suggest either just getting a 486 and using for now for both tripod and monopod or just getting a 3232 for monopod and get 488 later for tripod.

Yep, either or seems to be a good idea.

I understand that photography is a very long-term hobby. Investing in good equipment should be done over a long period of time, as one’s skills improves and needs grow larger. However, in the beginning, there are so many things (lenses, flashes, etc) that seem appealing (and visiting this forum does not help). I guess it will be either the 486 or the 3232 for a starter. Thanks everybody for the advices!

-Fi20100


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Sep 04, 2006 18:09 |  #12

One more vote for the 486RC2. I use my monopod lots for macro and you can't beat it for all the twisted positions you need to get into while using the monopod. Can't beat the price either.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SolPics
Senior Member
Avatar
709 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Solana Beach, CA
     
Sep 05, 2006 00:02 |  #13

I converted the 3232 to Arca Swiss type of head and it works great. Here is a link on converting http://reallyrightstuf​f.com/tutorials/monopo​ds/index.html (external link)


SolPics
Cannon 5D 30D, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135 f/2.0 L, 200 f/2.8 L, 500 f/4.0 L IS
17-40 f/4.0 L, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L, 580 EX,
Gitzo Tripod, all sorts of bags.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mat ­ Fitzsimmons
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wagga, Australia
     
Sep 05, 2006 03:18 |  #14

Heh, I've just mounted a RRS screw-type clamp directly onto the top of my monopod (a Gitzo 1588 ) - with no head at all. Haven't found it to be a problem at all yet, except if I want to shoot up at a significant angle (which I pretty much never do).


Mat Fitzsimmons
Canon 5D, other Canon stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Sep 05, 2006 03:57 |  #15

Well, usually it’s good to be able to angle the camera separately from the angel of the monopod. To keep the monopod really still, you want to use yourself and the monopod to form a tripod so to speak. This usually means that you are not trying to keep the monopod exactly vertical, but slightly angled towards yourself. In this case you really need to have some kind of a head that will let you angle the camera differently from the monopod.

-Fi20100


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,410 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
A suitable head monopod head for the Manfrotto 680B?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1400 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.