Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 05 Dec 2003 (Friday) 14:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portrait w/ PS Work

 
Mashuri
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Dec 05, 2003 14:35 |  #1

I posted this in dpreview and thought I'd throw it in here as well...

I was just goofing off in my apartment with my 300D / 50 1.8 II when I took this shot (no flash.) It was past midnight and Monica had had a long day, far from "looking her best" as she put it. Anyway I decided to see if I could "Max Factor" this photo and practice my PS techniques a little. I removed the blemishes (all this was supervised by Monica, of course. I'm not stupid, you know,) ;) whitened the tired eyes, "glamorized" the skin and sharpened everything else.

Here's before:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



And here's after:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MidKnight
Member
47 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Dec 05, 2003 16:38 |  #2

wow! thanks great. maybe you could post the details in steps of how you did it in PS




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mashuri
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Dec 05, 2003 16:46 |  #3

MidKnight wrote:
wow! thanks great. maybe you could post the details in steps of how you did it in PS

I pretty much followed Scott Kelby's instructructions to the letter. His book, "The Photoshop Book for Digital Photographers," is a must read. It's not for Photoshop newbies though. So long as you have some experience with PS it will serve you well. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbarr
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Dec 2003
     
Dec 05, 2003 20:12 |  #4

That's really impressive. She must have been happy with the results.

A rough outline of your steps would be nice, can't afford the book right now just having bought a new 70-200L :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mashuri
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Dec 08, 2003 16:17 |  #5

abbarr wrote:
That's really impressive. She must have been happy with the results.

A rough outline of your steps would be nice, can't afford the book right now just having bought a new 70-200L :)

Thanks!

Here's a rough outline of what I did:

I first used the healing brush to remove some of the blemishes. I also did a curves screen layer trick to whiten the eyes but I don't remember the exact procedure for that. Then I duplicated the layer and applied a gaussian blur to it (around 5% but you should vary it and check your results.) I set the opacity to 50% but, again, play with it to see what looks good. This will obviously blur the entire image so I hid the background image and, using a soft-edge eraser, I erased everything in the blurred image except the skin. Afterward you have a nice, sharp picture and a separate layer to mess with skin "glamorizing." That pretty much sums it up.

Here's an example where I lowered the blurred layer opacity from 50% to 30%. This gives it a more "natural-but-still-made-up" look:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Dec 09, 2003 12:52 |  #6

How about a slightly softer look?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mashuri
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Dec 09, 2003 13:01 |  #7

karusel wrote:
How about a slightly softer look?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

I certainly gives it a more surreal look. :) I personally like to keep the eyes, hair, etc., sharp but it does depend on what kind of mood one is trying to set. What adjustments did you make?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Dec 09, 2003 16:06 |  #8

Mashuri wrote:

I certainly gives it a more surreal look. :) I personally like to keep the eyes, hair, etc., sharp but it does depend on what kind of mood one is trying to set. What adjustments did you make?

What I did? Hmm... lemme try to remember... I don't use a strict recipe...

Duplicated layer, set blend mode to 'screen', applied about 4,0 gauss blur that's pretty much it. If you want more, darken the background layer and perhaps brighten the copy, reduce opacity until you see what you like. Oh and now I remembered one more thing, if you like sharp eyes and stuff just use about 20% opacity eraser and brush those parts of that second layer which you want sharp.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henkbos
Senior Member
923 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Dec 10, 2003 03:50 |  #9

Nice PS-work, but there is still some stuff to do:
- lady seems to tilt backwards, might have to rotrate the pic
- there are 2 mickey mouse ears behing her; some cloning?
- get rid of other disturbing elements in the background.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msvadi
Goldmember
1,974 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Dec 14, 2003 18:52 |  #10

Mashuri wrote:

I hid the background image and, using a soft-edge eraser, I erased everything in the blurred image except the skin.

I usually erase first and then apply gaussian blur. Some claim it gives better results. But, may be, it's not a big difference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mashuri
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
Dec 14, 2003 21:29 |  #11

msvadi wrote:
Mashuri wrote:

I hid the background image and, using a soft-edge eraser, I erased everything in the blurred image except the skin.

I usually erase first and then apply gaussian blur. Some claim it gives better results. But, may be, it's not a big difference.

Erasing first then blurring would create more of a "halo" or "glow" effect on the skin. Both can look good. It all depends on what floats your boat and I do it both ways.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,183 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Portrait w/ PS Work
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1754 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.